[NCSG-PC] Fw: Re: Sessions in Johannesburg?
Matthew Shears
matthew at intpolicy.com
Tue Apr 25 22:11:42 EEST 2017
I support this approach - thanks!
On 25/04/2017 21:04, farzaneh badii wrote:
> Hi Kathy, all,
>
> Actually it might make more sense to have NCSG meetings and not have
> separate NCUC meetings. Because from the schedule I see, we cannot
> possibly have meetings that do not conflict.
>
> I think Tapani wanted the slots for Outreach policy practice in the
> morning. which starts at 8.00 AM. If we can have 1 hour of those every
> day and prepare people for the rest of the day that would be good. We
> might have to just do 30 minutes lunch breaks (as instructed by the
> planning team) to either strategize for the afternoon or meet with
> other groups.
>
> I talked to EC members and they don't mind merging with NCSG. I might
> reserve a 30 minutes lunch break for an informal meeting with some of
> the board memebers but other than that I think we will be ok if NCSG
> can submit :
>
> One hour morning sessions (outreach and policy strategy)
>
> 30 minutes during lunch breaks
>
> If Tapani and the rest agree with that I will not ask for separate
> time slots for NCUC.
>
> Farzaneh
>
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Kathy Kleiman <kathy at kathykleiman.com
> <mailto:kathy at kathykleiman.com>> wrote:
>
> Observer too to Farzi's important suggestion -- with follow-up.
>
> Quick thought that we might want to have a longer NCUC/NCSG prep
> meeting (for all NCSG attendees) early on in the meeting. It would
> be good to have an arc of all the issues in Jo'burg we should be
> thinking about -- and give people some time to think, research and
> read for a day before jumping into a WG discussion.
>
> - So 30 minute AM meetings for the daily briefing
>
> - Occasional lunch sessions, including one with Board members
>
> - An initial hour meeting at the very start (Monday AM?) to
> provide an arc of the issues we need to work on together in this
> meeting.
>
> Best, Kathy
>
>
> On 4/25/2017 2:19 PM, farzaneh badii wrote:
>> Hello PC
>>
>> Observer here: for NCUC, not to make a very busy schedule
>> unnecessarily busier, I will send requests for 30 minutes morning
>> sessions and 45 minutes lunch break sessions. Since I will not be
>> there I would like some of the NCUC members on NCSG PC members to
>> lead the discussions and prepare our members for each day. We
>> might also arrange a 45 minutes board meeting for NCUC during a
>> lunch break.Please keep this in mind before submitting your
>> requests, we don't want to have schedule conflicts with NCSG. If
>> you want to also have similar half an hour morning sessions on
>> policy strategy and outreach, let me know perhaps just joining
>> NCSG meeting in the morning is wiser.
>>
>> Farzaneh
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 11:14 AM, Tapani Tarvainen
>> <ncsg at tapani.tarvainen.info <mailto:ncsg at tapani.tarvainen.info>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> I'm fine with an extra PC session - at least we can ask.
>>
>> Could somebody come up with a title and description for it?
>>
>> Deadline is tomorrow, and I'll be traveling most of the day,
>> like today (now in train) - I'll finalize this tomorrow evening.
>>
>> Tapani
>>
>> On Apr 25 17:59, Rafik Dammak (rafik.dammak at gmail.com
>> <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>) wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Ayden,
>> >
>> > yes, we can do that. It is at the end a policy forum so
>> discussing the
>> > scheduled topics and sessions, and planning response to
>> public comments and
>> > positions makes sense.
>> > I assume that should be on the last day so can we have it
>> as kind of
>> > wrap-up session.
>> > Best,
>> >
>> > Rafik
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > 2017-04-25 17:21 GMT+09:00 Ayden Férdeline
>> <icann at ferdeline.com <mailto:icann at ferdeline.com>>:
>> >
>> > > Resending this, as the PC list dropped off inadvertently.
>> > >
>> > > - Ayden
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > -------- Original Message --------
>> > > Subject: Re: [NCSG-PC] Sessions in Johannesburg?
>> > > Local Time: 25 April 2017 9:20 AM
>> > > UTC Time: 25 April 2017 08:20
>> > > From: icann at ferdeline.com <mailto:icann at ferdeline.com>
>> > > To: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com
>> <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>>
>> > >
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > > While I am open to meeting with other groups if time
>> permits, I am
>> > > wondering if it might be more useful having two PC
>> meetings --- one of
>> > > which could be solely for discussing upcoming public
>> comments, allocating
>> > > them, and formulating our positions?
>> > >
>> > > Best wishes,
>> > >
>> > > Ayden
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is <mailto:NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is>
>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>> <https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is <mailto:NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is>
>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>> <https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc>
>
> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
> Virus-free. www.avg.com
> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
>
>
> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
--
Matthew Shears
matthew at intpolicy.com
+447712472987
Skype:mshears
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20170425/ae6caf7f/attachment.htm>
More information about the NCSG-PC
mailing list