[NCSG-PC] Fw: Re: Sessions in Johannesburg?

[Kathy Kleiman]

Observer too to Farzi's important suggestion -- with follow-up.

Quick thought that we might want to have a longer NCUC/NCSG prep meeting 
(for all NCSG attendees) early on in the meeting. It would be good to 
have an arc of all the issues in Jo'burg we should be thinking about -- 
and give people some time to think, research and read for a day before 
jumping into a WG discussion.

- So 30 minute AM meetings for the daily briefing

- Occasional lunch sessions, including one with Board members

- An initial hour meeting at the very start (Monday AM?) to provide an 
arc of the issues we need to work on together in this meeting.

Best, Kathy


On 4/25/2017 2:19 PM, farzaneh badii wrote:
> Hello PC
>
> Observer here: for NCUC, not to make a very busy schedule 
> unnecessarily busier, I will send requests for 30 minutes morning 
> sessions and 45 minutes lunch break sessions. Since I will not be 
> there I would like some of the NCUC members on NCSG PC members to lead 
> the discussions and prepare our members for each day. We might also 
> arrange a 45 minutes board meeting for NCUC during a lunch 
> break.Please keep this in mind before submitting your requests, we 
> don't want to have schedule conflicts with NCSG. If you want to also 
> have similar half an hour morning sessions on policy strategy and 
> outreach, let me know perhaps just joining NCSG meeting in the morning 
> is wiser.
>
> Farzaneh
>
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 11:14 AM, Tapani Tarvainen 
> <ncsg at tapani.tarvainen.info <mailto:ncsg at tapani.tarvainen.info>> wrote:
>
>     I'm fine with an extra PC session - at least we can ask.
>
>     Could somebody come up with a title and description for it?
>
>     Deadline is tomorrow, and I'll be traveling most of the day,
>     like today (now in train) - I'll finalize this tomorrow evening.
>
>     Tapani
>
>     On Apr 25 17:59, Rafik Dammak (rafik.dammak at gmail.com
>     <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>) wrote:
>
>     > Hi Ayden,
>     >
>     > yes, we can do that. It is at the end a policy forum so
>     discussing the
>     > scheduled topics and sessions, and planning response to public
>     comments and
>     > positions makes sense.
>     > I assume that should be on the last day so can we have it as kind of
>     > wrap-up session.
>     > Best,
>     >
>     > Rafik
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > 2017-04-25 17:21 GMT+09:00 Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com
>     <mailto:icann at ferdeline.com>>:
>     >
>     > > Resending this, as the PC list dropped off inadvertently.
>     > >
>     > > - Ayden
>     > >
>     > >
>     > > -------- Original Message --------
>     > > Subject: Re: [NCSG-PC] Sessions in Johannesburg?
>     > > Local Time: 25 April 2017 9:20 AM
>     > > UTC Time: 25 April 2017 08:20
>     > > From: icann at ferdeline.com <mailto:icann at ferdeline.com>
>     > > To: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com
>     <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>>
>     > >
>     > > Hi,
>     > >
>     > > While I am open to meeting with other groups if time permits, I am
>     > > wondering if it might be more useful having two PC meetings
>     --- one of
>     > > which could be solely for discussing upcoming public comments,
>     allocating
>     > > them, and formulating our positions?
>     > >
>     > > Best wishes,
>     > >
>     > > Ayden
>     _______________________________________________
>     NCSG-PC mailing list
>     NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is <mailto:NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is>
>     https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>     <https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20170425/199f5a22/attachment.htm>