[NCSG-PC] Agreed Action Item from SSC Representative Selection Call

[Stephanie Perrin]

I thought, since there are all kinds of allegations swirling around that 
there are "secret lists" and Tapani has recused himself from the 
process, that when I brought up this matter during our meeting last 
week, there was agreement there would be a report back to the entire 
discuss list explaining how this process was being run, and dismissing 
the allegations of secret lists (copy my email to Tapani if you wish, he 
has not replied to me yet).

We are making a mountain out of a molehill here with this debate over 
which of the two remaining candidates we select, in my view.  As Stefi 
said, this is not the election for POTUS.  However, I think it is 
important that subcommittees of the GNSO are not popularity contests, 
they are staffed according to merit.  I look forward to seeing a clear 
process outlined.  If there is not going to be one, we might as well 
just vote on list and get it over with.  Last time the call was almost 
two hours, not 1.5.  Most of us are very busy.

Stephanie Perrin


On 2017-04-02 18:14, matthew shears wrote:
>
> Hi all
>
> As I noted in my e-mail last week announcing the selection of Renata 
> and Poncelet, the process to select the third member for the SSC 
> continues this week.
>
> To respond to Ayden's concerns below I must reemphasize the following:
>
> We are meeting as a subgroup of the NCSG PC this week to continue our 
> deliberations.   It is our goal to announce our decision on the third 
> slot of the SSC by CoB Friday.
>
> There is no secret list or whatever - the group comprises, as 
> indicated before, the following PC members: Ayden, Juan Manuel, 
> Marilia, Martin, Stefania, Stephanie and myself.
>
> We will be following the same process as we did for Renata and 
> Poncelet: a discussion of the merits of the candidates according to 
> the information we have and the criteria that have been developed.
>
> We are doing our very best to make sure that this selection process 
> delivers the best possible members for the community.  I hope that you 
> trust that we will do so.
>
> Thanks again for your support in this process.
>
> Matthew
>
> (Note - I am transitioning to a new e-mail address: matthew at intpolicy.com)
>
>
>
>
> On 02/04/2017 17:04, Ayden Férdeline wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On the call last Wednesday to select our representatives for the 
>> SSC, I thought an agreed action item was that a message would be sent 
>> to the main NCSG mailing list clarifying how we have been making our 
>> appointments to the SSC, and squashing the unfair rumour that has 
>> been percolating that there had been been a 'secret list' of some 
>> kind. I have not seen this email just yet, but I hope it will be 
>> circulated soon, and will also outline the process we will follow 
>> this Friday to select our final representative for the SSC.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Ayden
>>
>> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> 
>> 	Virus-free. www.avg.com 
>> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> 
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>
> ------------
> Matthew Shears
> Global Internet Policy and Human Rights
> Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT)
> + 44 771 2472987
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20170403/b3aa6e67/attachment.htm>