[PC-NCSG] GNSO Vice Chair selection

[David Cake]

> On 21 Oct 2016, at 5:07 PM, Tapani Tarvainen <ncsg at tapani.tarvainen.info> wrote:
> 
> From your second message:
> 
>> 	That its probably going to be disliked is actually a point in
>> its failure. We have incentive to seek consensus.
> 
> Did you mean in its favour?

	Yes. Damn you typps and autocorrect. 

> The idea was specifically to provide an incentive to seek consensus,
> by providing an at least somewhat annoying default outcome.

	Yes, Good plan. 

> 
> So should we suggest it to the CSG to see what they think (which
> presumably would lead to further discussion, I doubt they'd
> instantly accept it anyway), or would you have some alternative
> you'd like to suggest?

	No I?m happy for us to take that to the CSG. 

	David