[PC-NCSG] Vice Chair elections

[Milan, Stefania]

I trust Avri's expertise here so happy to change my mind (!), but what impact would this have on the actual management of the Council work e.g. in relation to meetings?


________________________________________
Da: PC-NCSG <pc-ncsg-bounces at ipjustice.org> per conto di avri doria <avri at apc.org>
Inviato: domenica 6 novembre 2016 10.00.48
A: pc-ncsg at ipjustice.org
Oggetto: Re: [PC-NCSG] Vice Chair elections

Hi,

If you go with option 1, you can assume that there will be no v-chair in
after Heather completes her term.  Whereas if you go with option 2 you
can assume that there will be alternating short term v-chairs, which
means they would get every other temp slot - thus to their advantage.

I recommend option 1.

avri



On 06-Nov-16 14:19, matthew shears wrote:
> so... I don't like inconsistencies from meeting to meeting and would
> rather have pressure of no NCPH VC
>
>
> On 06/11/2016 08:45, Tapani Tarvainen wrote:
>> FYI: CSG accepts whichever of the two alternatives for step 12 we
>> want. If we can agree on it that is. :-)
>>
>> To recap, the choices were like this:
>>
>> "
>> 12. If no agreement is reached in time for a council meeting,
>>
>> [there will be no NCPH Vice Chair in that meeting]
>>
>> [the non-incumbent SG nominates VC candidate for that meeting only,
>> the other SG may only reject the candidate in favour of the NCA;
>> should the situation reoccur, the nomination would alternate
>> between SGs from meeting to meeting]
>> "
>>
>> Opinions?
>>
>> Tapani
>>
>>
>> ----- Forwarded message from tonyarholmes
>> <tonyarholmes at btinternet.com> -----
>>
>> Dear Tapani
>>
>> First, thanks for the constructive discussion during this morning's NCPH
>> meeting. Within the CSG we have since discussed how best to progress the
>> remaining unresolved issue on point 12 and reach conclusion.
>>
>>
>> The CSG would therefore like to propose that  the NCSG selects its
>> preferred
>> approach on Point 12 and we would be willing to concur with that choice.
>>
>>
>> Could you please let us know your decision.
>>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Tony
>>
>> ----- End forwarded message -----
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus


_______________________________________________
PC-NCSG mailing list
PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, forwarding, or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited without the express permission of the sender. If you received this communication in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.