[PC-NCSG] Vice Chair elections

[avri doria]

Hi,

If you go with option 1, you can assume that there will be no v-chair in
after Heather completes her term.  Whereas if you go with option 2 you
can assume that there will be alternating short term v-chairs, which
means they would get every other temp slot - thus to their advantage.

I recommend option 1.

avri



On 06-Nov-16 14:19, matthew shears wrote:
> so... I don't like inconsistencies from meeting to meeting and would
> rather have pressure of no NCPH VC
>
>
> On 06/11/2016 08:45, Tapani Tarvainen wrote:
>> FYI: CSG accepts whichever of the two alternatives for step 12 we
>> want. If we can agree on it that is. :-)
>>
>> To recap, the choices were like this:
>>
>> "
>> 12. If no agreement is reached in time for a council meeting,
>>
>> [there will be no NCPH Vice Chair in that meeting]
>>
>> [the non-incumbent SG nominates VC candidate for that meeting only,
>> the other SG may only reject the candidate in favour of the NCA;
>> should the situation reoccur, the nomination would alternate
>> between SGs from meeting to meeting]
>> "
>>
>> Opinions?
>>
>> Tapani
>>
>>
>> ----- Forwarded message from tonyarholmes
>> <tonyarholmes at btinternet.com> -----
>>
>> Dear Tapani
>>
>> First, thanks for the constructive discussion during this morning's NCPH
>> meeting. Within the CSG we have since discussed how best to progress the
>> remaining unresolved issue on point 12 and reach conclusion.
>>
>>
>> The CSG would therefore like to propose that  the NCSG selects its
>> preferred
>> approach on Point 12 and we would be willing to concur with that choice.
>>
>>
>> Could you please let us know your decision.
>>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Tony
>>
>> ----- End forwarded message -----
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus