[PC-NCSG] [NCSG-Discuss] Public comment period on RDAP closing 18/03

[Amr Elsadr]

Hi,

OK. I get your point, which makes sense. I don?t have an answer to whether it is within the scope of the GNSO to recommend that a certain protocol be used by contracted parties. Like you said, the policy requirements/recommendations are what the GNSO provides the ICANN board. At the risk of being wrong, I will assume that this will eventually become a discussion topic on the next gen. RDS PDP.

Thanks.

Amr

> On Mar 19, 2016, at 2:10 PM, avri doria <avri at apc.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On 18-Mar-16 11:18, Amr Elsadr wrote:
>>>> Also, is this in scope for either the WG or even the GNSO?  And how
>>>> would anyone force the Registrars to do it?
>> I believe so. Why wouldn?t it be within the scope of the WG and GNSO? Am I missing something?
>> 
>> And registrars can be forced to do it via changes in the RAA, right? I?m certain they will be all over any work that may lead to changes in their contractual obligations, so will hopefully be part of the discussion and final decision. I don?t imagine they are ever happy about spending money to implement ICANN policies, but suspect they?ve seen this coming for a while now. I may, of course, be delusional. :)
> 
> while Policy that may seem to be best satisfied by RDAP is within the
> GNSO scope, is the protocol they use to do it within that scope? 
> 
> I do not have a position on that, it is still a question for me. 
> 
> On thr RrSG postion, i get the idea that they want to push it off as
> long as possible.  Many see no reason to implement something now for
> policy that may or may not be made.  Capital investment delayed is
> better than capital investment now.  Are reason other than policy in
> scope for the GNSO.  They might be in scope for a SSAC recommendation is
> they can be pinned on stability or security.
> 
> I remind you, I support the IAB position and recommend endorsing it.  I
> just do not know whether it is in GNSO scope to decide anything about it.
> 
> avri
> 
> avri
> 
> 
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg