[PC-NCSG] [NCSG-Discuss] Public comment period on RDAP closing 18/03

[avri doria]

On 18-Mar-16 11:18, Amr Elsadr wrote:
>> > Also, is this in scope for either the WG or even the GNSO?  And how
>> > would anyone force the Registrars to do it?
> I believe so. Why wouldn?t it be within the scope of the WG and GNSO? Am I missing something?
>
> And registrars can be forced to do it via changes in the RAA, right? I?m certain they will be all over any work that may lead to changes in their contractual obligations, so will hopefully be part of the discussion and final decision. I don?t imagine they are ever happy about spending money to implement ICANN policies, but suspect they?ve seen this coming for a while now. I may, of course, be delusional. :)

while Policy that may seem to be best satisfied by RDAP is within the
GNSO scope, is the protocol they use to do it within that scope? 

I do not have a position on that, it is still a question for me. 

On thr RrSG postion, i get the idea that they want to push it off as
long as possible.  Many see no reason to implement something now for
policy that may or may not be made.  Capital investment delayed is
better than capital investment now.  Are reason other than policy in
scope for the GNSO.  They might be in scope for a SSAC recommendation is
they can be pinned on stability or security.

I remind you, I support the IAB position and recommend endorsing it.  I
just do not know whether it is in GNSO scope to decide anything about it.

avri

avri


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus