[PC-NCSG] Fwd: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Principles for CCWGs -- Public Comment

[Rafik Dammak]

Hi Stephanie,

some history here it is process initiated by GNSO itself in 2012 following
the undue heat about the joint working group on new gTLD applicant support
between GNSO and ALAC (there were other joint WGs like the ones with SSAC
and ccNSO about Internationalized Registration  data and one about IDN ,
and they were are quite restricted).

I think for some (non-PDP) topics it makes to have other SO/AC involved.
for GNSO PDP, GNSO is setting its own working group with open membership

Best,

Rafik

2016-02-26 1:29 GMT+09:00 Stephanie Perrin <
stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>:

>
> How do we feel about this, folks?  I am concerned about the ongoing
> relevance of the GNSO.....just wondering.
> cheers steph
>
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Principles for CCWGs -- Public Comment
> Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 11:44:46 +0000
> From: Gomes, Chuck <cgomes at verisign.com> <cgomes at verisign.com>
> To: Grace Abuhamad <grace.abuhamad at icann.org> <grace.abuhamad at icann.org>,
> cwg-stewardship at icann.org <cwg-stewardship at icann.org>
> <cwg-stewardship at icann.org>, Accountability Cross Community
> <accountability-cross-community at icann.org>
> <accountability-cross-community at icann.org>
> CC: Mary Wong <mary.wong at icann.org> <mary.wong at icann.org>
>
>
> Thanks for flagging this Grace.  I note that there is a session in
> Marrakech on this:  ?Non-PDP CCWG Principles Cross Community Working Group
> 10:45 am - 12 pm UTC?.   I fully agree with Grace that those of us in the
>  CWG Stewardship (as well as those in the CCWG Accountability) should be
> very well qualified to provided relevant input into the proposed framework
> for cross community working groups.  I am not a member of the cross
> community WG that prepared the framework, but I have tracked their work
> over the last couple years and plan to attend the session in Marrakech.
>
>
>
> Chuck
>
>
>
> *From:* cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org [
> mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org
> <cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org>] *On Behalf Of *Grace Abuhamad
> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 24, 2016 6:15 PM
> *To:* cwg-stewardship at icann.org; Accountability Cross Community
> *Cc:* Mary Wong
> *Subject:* [CWG-Stewardship] Principles for CCWGs -- Public Comment
>
>
>
> Dear CWG-Stewardship and CCWG-Accountability members, participants, and
> observers,
>
>
>
> I?m writing to request your expert feedback for the public comment on the
> draft framework principles for cross community working groups:
> https://www.icann.org/public-comments/ccwg-framework-principles-draft-2016-02-22-en.
> I?ve attached the draft to the email for your convenience.
>
>
>
> *Why you?*
>
> You are the experts. You are the past, the present, and the future of
> cross community working groups at ICANN. You have survived one (or both) of
> the big IANA Stewardship Transition working groups over the past two years,
> and you probably (I hope!) have a lot to reflect upon and share.
>
>
>
> *What?s the point?*
>
> There are no agreed community-wide guidelines on the use of CCWGs, but
> they are such an *awesome* form of multistakeholder policymaking that the
> ICANN community is increasingly reliant on CCWGs for their policy
> efforts. The CCWG-Principles has taken on the task of developing a uniform
> framework of principles intended to guide the formation, initiation,
> operations and closure of future CCWGs.
>
>
>
> *How much time do I have?*
>
> The public comment period opened on Monday this week. You have 39 days
> left, until *23 April at 23:59 UTC*. You could jot down some thoughts
> during your long plane rides to/from Marrakech, or even as you observe the
> action during the sessions!
>
>
>
> The email to which your comments may be sent is: <
> <comments-ccwg-framework-principles-22feb16 at icann.org>
> comments-ccwg-framework-principles-22feb16 at icann.org>. If you have any
> questions, please contact Mary Wong (cc?ed here).
>
>
>
> I am passionate about this work because we?ve innovated and learned so
> much from the IANA Stewardship Transition working groups, and I have had
> the privilege and opportunity to work with both groups from their
> formation. I am keen to see where the outcome of this public comment period
> takes us next, and I very much hope that you will take pride in designing
> that path forward.
>
>
>
> ?Grace
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20160226/5dfdc128/attachment.html>