[PC-NCSG] Fwd: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Principles for CCWGs -- Public Comment

[Stephanie Perrin]

How do we feel about this, folks?  I am concerned about the ongoing 
relevance of the GNSO.....just wondering.
cheers steph

-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: 	Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Principles for CCWGs -- Public Comment
Date: 	Thu, 25 Feb 2016 11:44:46 +0000
From: 	Gomes, Chuck <cgomes at verisign.com>
To: 	Grace Abuhamad <grace.abuhamad at icann.org>, 
cwg-stewardship at icann.org <cwg-stewardship at icann.org>, Accountability 
Cross Community <accountability-cross-community at icann.org>
CC: 	Mary Wong <mary.wong at icann.org>



Thanks for flagging this Grace.  I note that there is a session in 
Marrakech on this:  ?Non-PDP CCWG Principles Cross Community Working 
Group  10:45 am - 12 pm UTC?.   I fully agree with Grace that those of 
us in the  CWG Stewardship (as well as those in the CCWG Accountability) 
should be very well qualified to provided relevant input into the 
proposed framework for cross community working groups.  I am not a 
member of the cross community WG that prepared the framework, but I have 
tracked their work over the last couple years and plan to attend the 
session in Marrakech.

Chuck

*From:*cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org 
[mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Grace Abuhamad
*Sent:* Wednesday, February 24, 2016 6:15 PM
*To:* cwg-stewardship at icann.org; Accountability Cross Community
*Cc:* Mary Wong
*Subject:* [CWG-Stewardship] Principles for CCWGs -- Public Comment

Dear CWG-Stewardship and CCWG-Accountability members, participants, and 
observers,

I?m writing to request your expert feedback for the public comment on 
the draft framework principles for cross community working groups: 
https://www.icann.org/public-comments/ccwg-framework-principles-draft-2016-02-22-en. 
I?ve attached the draft to the email for your convenience.

*/Why you?/*

You are the experts. You are the past, the present, and the future of 
cross community working groups at ICANN. You have survived one (or both) 
of the big IANA Stewardship Transition working groups over the past two 
years, and you probably (I hope!) have a lot to reflect upon and share.

*/What?s the point?/*

There are no agreed community-wide guidelines on the use of CCWGs, but 
they are such an _awesome_ form of multistakeholder policymaking that 
the ICANN community is increasingly reliant on CCWGs for their policy 
efforts. The CCWG-Principles has taken on the task of developing a 
uniform framework of principles intended to guide the formation, 
initiation, operations and closure of future CCWGs.



*/How much time do I have?/*

The public comment period opened on Monday this week. You have 39 days 
left, until *23 April at 23:59 UTC*. You could jot down some thoughts 
during your long plane rides to/from Marrakech, or even as you observe 
the action during the sessions!

The email to which your comments may be sent is: 
<comments-ccwg-framework-principles-22feb16 at icann.org 
<mailto:comments-ccwg-framework-principles-22feb16 at icann.org>>. If you 
have any questions, please contact Mary Wong (cc?ed here).

I am passionate about this work because we?ve innovated and learned so 
much from the IANA Stewardship Transition working groups, and I have had 
the privilege and opportunity to work with both groups from their 
formation. I am keen to see where the outcome of this public comment 
period takes us next, and I very much hope that you will take pride in 
designing that path forward.

?Grace



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20160225/4af7e601/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
CWG-Stewardship mailing list
CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship