[PC-NCSG] Fwd: [Soac-infoalert] Invitation to meet with TMCH Independent Review team

[Stephanie Perrin]

We might get some support on ALAC.....worth a try anyway.
cheers steph

On 16-02-13 3:59 PM, Kathy Kleiman wrote:
> I was thinking NCSG -- CSG loves it and Rr/RySGs are reconciled to it.
> Tx for asking. Best, K
>
> On 2/13/2016 3:42 PM, Stephanie Perrin wrote:
>> Do you mean within NCSG, or do you mean reaching out to other SGs Kathy?
>> cheers stephanie
>>
>> On 16-02-13 8:01 AM, Kathy Kleiman wrote:
>>> Tx you for posting this, Rafik. It looks like the GAC is seeking to 
>>> overturn consensus policy and ICANN has just hired the staff to do 
>>> so. Would anyone else like to join us in contesting this?
>>> Best,
>>> Kathy
>>>
>>> On 2/13/2016 5:17 AM, Rafik Dammak wrote:
>>>> hi,.
>>>>
>>>> I guess that will interest some among us , like Robin and Kathy.
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>>
>>>> Rafik
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: *Glen de Saint G?ry* <Glen at icann.org <mailto:Glen at icann.org>>
>>>> Date: 2016-02-13 7:34 GMT+09:00
>>>> Subject: [Soac-infoalert] Invitation to meet with TMCH Independent 
>>>> Review team
>>>> To: "Soac-infoalert at icann.org <mailto:Soac-infoalert at icann.org>" 
>>>> <Soac-infoalert at icann.org <mailto:Soac-infoalert at icann.org>>
>>>> Cc: Karen Lentz <karen.lentz at icann.org <mailto:karen.lentz at icann.org>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Dear SO/AC leaders,
>>>>
>>>> As you may be aware, ICANN is conducting an independent review of 
>>>> the Trademark Clearinghouse, which was recommended by the GAC in 
>>>> 2011 (see 
>>>> <https://archive.icann.org/en/topics/new-gtlds/gac-comments-new-gtlds-26may11-en.pdf>https://archive.icann.org/en/topics/new-gtlds/gac-comments-new-gtlds-26may11-en.pdf). 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The GAC advised that the following specific topics should be 
>>>> included in the review?s terms of reference:  (1) handling of 
>>>> non-exact matches to trademarks, (2) extension of the Trademark 
>>>> Claims notifications, and (3) impacts of the Claims services on the 
>>>> commercial watch services market.
>>>>
>>>> ICANN has engaged Analysis Group 
>>>> (http://www.analysisgroup.com/home/) to perform this review.  Team 
>>>> members who will be performing this review will be in attendance at 
>>>> ICANN55, and are available to meet with SO/AC groups as 
>>>> interested.  While there is a general session planned on this 
>>>> topic, it may be helpful for interested stakeholder groups to 
>>>> schedule some time in a smaller setting to provide input and ask 
>>>> any questions on the review.  If you are interested in scheduling 
>>>> such a slot with your group during ICANN55, please contact 
>>>> Antonietta Mangiacotti, (antonietta.mangiacotti at icann.org) who will 
>>>> coordinate.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>>
>>>> *Karen Lentz*
>>>>
>>>> Director, Operations & Policy Research
>>>>
>>>> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
>>>>
>>>> Direct Line: +1 310 301 5836 <tel:%2B1%20310%20301%205836>
>>>>
>>>> Mobile: +1 310 895 3637 <tel:%2B1%20310%20895%203637>
>>>>
>>>> Email: <mailto:karen.lentz at icann.org>karen.lentz at icann.org
>>>>
>>>> <http://www.icann.org>www.icann.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> soac-infoalert mailing list
>>>> soac-infoalert at icann.org <mailto:soac-infoalert at icann.org>
>>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/soac-infoalert
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>>>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20160213/001fa99b/attachment.html>