[PC-NCSG] Fwd: [Soac-infoalert] Invitation to meet with TMCH Independent Review team

[Kathy Kleiman]

I was thinking NCSG -- CSG loves it and Rr/RySGs are reconciled to it.
Tx for asking. Best, K

On 2/13/2016 3:42 PM, Stephanie Perrin wrote:
> Do you mean within NCSG, or do you mean reaching out to other SGs Kathy?
> cheers stephanie
>
> On 16-02-13 8:01 AM, Kathy Kleiman wrote:
>> Tx you for posting this, Rafik. It looks like the GAC is seeking to 
>> overturn consensus policy and ICANN has just hired the staff to do 
>> so. Would anyone else like to join us in contesting this?
>> Best,
>> Kathy
>>
>> On 2/13/2016 5:17 AM, Rafik Dammak wrote:
>>> hi,.
>>>
>>> I guess that will interest some among us , like Robin and Kathy.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> Rafik
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: *Glen de Saint G?ry* <Glen at icann.org <mailto:Glen at icann.org>>
>>> Date: 2016-02-13 7:34 GMT+09:00
>>> Subject: [Soac-infoalert] Invitation to meet with TMCH Independent 
>>> Review team
>>> To: "Soac-infoalert at icann.org <mailto:Soac-infoalert at icann.org>" 
>>> <Soac-infoalert at icann.org <mailto:Soac-infoalert at icann.org>>
>>> Cc: Karen Lentz <karen.lentz at icann.org <mailto:karen.lentz at icann.org>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Dear SO/AC leaders,
>>>
>>> As you may be aware, ICANN is conducting an independent review of 
>>> the Trademark Clearinghouse, which was recommended by the GAC in 
>>> 2011 (see 
>>> <https://archive.icann.org/en/topics/new-gtlds/gac-comments-new-gtlds-26may11-en.pdf>https://archive.icann.org/en/topics/new-gtlds/gac-comments-new-gtlds-26may11-en.pdf). 
>>>
>>>
>>> The GAC advised that the following specific topics should be 
>>> included in the review?s terms of reference:  (1) handling of 
>>> non-exact matches to trademarks, (2) extension of the Trademark 
>>> Claims notifications, and (3) impacts of the Claims services on the 
>>> commercial watch services market.
>>>
>>> ICANN has engaged Analysis Group 
>>> (http://www.analysisgroup.com/home/) to perform this review.  Team 
>>> members who will be performing this review will be in attendance at 
>>> ICANN55, and are available to meet with SO/AC groups as interested.  
>>> While there is a general session planned on this topic, it may be 
>>> helpful for interested stakeholder groups to schedule some time in a 
>>> smaller setting to provide input and ask any questions on the 
>>> review.  If you are interested in scheduling such a slot with your 
>>> group during ICANN55, please contact Antonietta Mangiacotti, 
>>> (antonietta.mangiacotti at icann.org) who will coordinate.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> *Karen Lentz*
>>>
>>> Director, Operations & Policy Research
>>>
>>> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
>>>
>>> Direct Line: +1 310 301 5836 <tel:%2B1%20310%20301%205836>
>>>
>>> Mobile: +1 310 895 3637 <tel:%2B1%20310%20895%203637>
>>>
>>> Email: <mailto:karen.lentz at icann.org>karen.lentz at icann.org
>>>
>>> <http://www.icann.org>www.icann.org
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> soac-infoalert mailing list
>>> soac-infoalert at icann.org <mailto:soac-infoalert at icann.org>
>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/soac-infoalert
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20160213/43e55076/attachment-0001.html>