[PC-NCSG] Fwd: Re: [ccwg-internet-governance] Fwd: [council] AMENDMENT - Motion on Conditional Participation of the GNSO as a Chartering Organization for CCWG-IG

Wed Dec 14 19:24:43 EET 2016

Need an alternative suggestion pretty fast....
SP

-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: 	Re: [ccwg-internet-governance] Fwd: [council] AMENDMENT - 
Motion on Conditional Participation of the GNSO as a Chartering 
Organization for CCWG-IG
Date: 	Wed, 14 Dec 2016 17:13:05 +0000
From: 	Marilyn Cade <marilynscade at hotmail.com>
To: 	Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com>, farzaneh badii 
<farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
CC: 	ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org 
<ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org>

I think we should just do this, and I hope that Olivier and Nigel are 
joining,  as well... but also gathering inputs and participants from all 
of the GNSO constituencies. .

Yes, we need some geo diversity. Perhaps Jimson/BC - Africa ICT 
Alliance, and some others from non WEOG can contribute. Someone from 
ISPs? Someone from each other Constituency?

Are we inviting others from other SGs or ACs, or first drafting as GNSO? 
Sorry to ask but I can also reach out to CCTLDS and GAC if you are 
seeking broader drafting partners in this but I thought it was first GNSO?

M

------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* ccwg-internet-governance-bounces at icann.org 
<ccwg-internet-governance-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Greg Shatan 
<gregshatanipc at gmail.com>
*Sent:* Wednesday, December 14, 2016 11:53 AM
*To:* farzaneh badii
*Cc:* ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
*Subject:* Re: [ccwg-internet-governance] Fwd: [council] AMENDMENT - 
Motion on Conditional Participation of the GNSO as a Chartering 
Organization for CCWG-IG
I suggest we assemble a (Re-)Drafting Team and get on with it.

Marilyn has volunteered.
It might be a fair assumption that Keith and Farzi have "volunteered" as 
well, by replying to this email.  (Which probably means I have 
volunteered too).
Whether or not that's a fair assumption, I think we need some non-GNSO 
participation in the drafting team to round things out (Marilyn, Keith, 
Farzi and I are all similarly afflicted, though with different strains 
of the GNSO virus).  A preponderance of GNSO folk is fine (especially 
since the GNSO is the "inspiration" for this project), but we should be 
somewhat more diverse than that....  (Farzi no longer even gives us 
geographic diversity, since she's now a North American Georgia Peach, or 
Georgia Tech Yellow Jacket, or something like that...)

Let's not wait until the meeting next week to get this going.  Wouldn't 
it be nice to have a progress report at next week's meeting instead?

Any other volunteers?

Anyone volunteering to chair?  (Not I, with apologies, I'm chaired-out 
at the moment.)

Greg

On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 11:15 AM, farzaneh badii 
<farzaneh.badii at gmail.com <mailto:farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>> wrote:

    Thanks Keith for bringing this up again. I think we need to start
    doing something about it and we have to start soon.

    On 14 December 2016 at 11:10, Drazek, Keith <kdrazek at verisign.com
    <mailto:kdrazek at verisign.com>> wrote:

        Hi all,

        Is there a plan to get this process started? Copenhagen will be
        here before we know it.

        Regards,

        Keith

        Keith Drazek

        Vice President

        Public Policy & Government Relations

        Verisign, Inc.

        +1-571-377-9182 <tel:+1%20571-377-9182>

        kdrazek at verisign.com <mailto:kdrazek at verisign.com>

        *From:*ccwg-internet-governance-bounces at icann.org
        <mailto:ccwg-internet-governance-bounces at icann.org>
        [mailto:ccwg-internet-governance-bounces at icann.org
        <mailto:ccwg-internet-governance-bounces at icann.org>] *On Behalf
        Of *Rafik Dammak
        *Sent:* Monday, November 07, 2016 4:10 AM
        *To:* ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
        <mailto:ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org>
        *Subject:* [ccwg-internet-governance] Fwd: [council] AMENDMENT -
        Motion on Conditional Participation of the GNSO as a Chartering
        Organization for CCWG-IG

        Hi everyone,

        GNSO council just approved unanimously this motion. It is still
        chartering organization but we got work to do by Copenhagen meeting.

        Best,

        Rafik
        ---
         >
         > 2.         MOTION ? Conditional participation of the GNSO as
        a Chartering Organization for the Cross Community Working Group
        to discuss Internet governance (CWG-IG) issues affecting ICANN
         >
         > Made by: Darcy Southwell
         >
         > Seconded by:
         >
         >
         >
         > WHEREAS:
         >
         > a)      The GNSO Council adopted the charter for a Cross
        Community Working Group to discuss Internet governance (CWG-IG)
        issues affecting ICANN and make recommendations to the
        chartering organization on these issues on 15 October 2014, and
        as such became a Chartering Organization.
         >
         > b)      The Charter foresees that ?At each ICANN Annual
        General Meeting, starting 2014, the Charter and deliverables of
        the WG shall be reviewed by the participating SO?s and AC?s to
        determine whether the WG should continue, or, close and be
        dissolved. Consistent with ICANN community practices, the WG
        will continue if at least two of the participating SO?s or AC?s
        extend the Charter of the WG and notify the other participating
        SO?s and AC?s accordingly one month after the annual review date?.
         >
         > c)      The CWG-IG provided its first written status update
        on 23 June 2016 (see
        https://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/ccwg-internet-governance-23jun16-en.pdf
        <https://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/ccwg-internet-governance-23jun16-en.pdf>).
         >
         > d)      The GNSO Council recently adopted the ?Uniform
        Framework of Principles and Recommendations for Cross Community
        Working Groups? (CWG Framework) which details the lifecycle of a
        CCWG including initiation, formation, operation,
        decision-making, adoption of Final Report by Chartering
        Organizations and closure of CCWG, and post-closure of CCWG.
         >
         > e)      The GNSO Council has observed that the CWG-IG does
        not follow this lifecycle, nor has it established or adopted an
        initial work plan and associated schedule as foreseen in its
        Charter.
         >
         > f)       The GNSO Council recognizes the importance of a
        continued dialogue and discussion in relation to the topic of
        Internet Governance within an ICANN context.
         >
         > g)      The GNSO Council has shared its concerns with the
        ccNSO Council and representatives of other SO/ACs on the subject
        of this CWG and its future.
         >
         >
         >
         > RESOLVED:
         >
         > a)      The GNSO Council will continue to participate as a
        Chartering Organization for the CWG-IG. However, this
        participation is conditioned upon a comprehensive review of the
        CWG-IG Charter by the CWG-IG, in accordance with the CWG
        Framework
        (http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/uniform-framework-principles-recommendations-16sep16-en.pdf
        <http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/uniform-framework-principles-recommendations-16sep16-en.pdf>).
        In particular, the GNSO Council expects future work to be
        subject to a clear work plan, with regular updates and clear
        deliverables.
         >
         > b)      The GNSO Council expects that the CWG-IG will present
        by ICANN58 a report on its findings, which may include a revised
        charter or a recommendation to reconstitute the group under a
        new structure.
         >
         > c)      Following the submission of the CWG-IG report, the
        GNSO Council will consider the recommendations and decide
        whether or not it will continue as a Chartering Organization.
         >
         > d)      The GNSO Secretariat will communicate this decision
        to the CWG-IG Chairs as well as the other Chartering Organizations.
         >
         >

        _______________________________________________
        ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
        ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
        <mailto:ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org>
        https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance
        <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance>

    -- 
    Farzaneh

    _______________________________________________
    ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
    ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
    <mailto:ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org>
    https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance
    <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20161214/72356543/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance