[PC-NCSG] Fwd: Re: [ccwg-internet-governance] Fwd: [council] AMENDMENT - Motion on Conditional Participation of the GNSO as a Chartering Organization for CCWG-IG
Stephanie Perrin
stephanie.perrin
Wed Dec 14 18:28:03 EET 2016
sorry to spam you all, but another issue we need to discuss....
SP
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Re: [ccwg-internet-governance] Fwd: [council] AMENDMENT -
Motion on Conditional Participation of the GNSO as a Chartering
Organization for CCWG-IG
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 16:10:39 +0000
From: Drazek, Keith <kdrazek at verisign.com>
To: ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
<ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org>
Hi all,
Is there a plan to get this process started? Copenhagen will be here
before we know it.
Regards,
Keith
Keith Drazek
Vice President
Public Policy & Government Relations
Verisign, Inc.
+1-571-377-9182
kdrazek at verisign.com <mailto:kdrazek at verisign.com>
*From:*ccwg-internet-governance-bounces at icann.org
[mailto:ccwg-internet-governance-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Rafik
Dammak
*Sent:* Monday, November 07, 2016 4:10 AM
*To:* ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
*Subject:* [ccwg-internet-governance] Fwd: [council] AMENDMENT - Motion
on Conditional Participation of the GNSO as a Chartering Organization
for CCWG-IG
Hi everyone,
GNSO council just approved unanimously this motion. It is still
chartering organization but we got work to do by Copenhagen meeting.
Best,
Rafik
---
>
> 2. MOTION ? Conditional participation of the GNSO as a
Chartering Organization for the Cross Community Working Group to discuss
Internet governance (CWG-IG) issues affecting ICANN
>
> Made by: Darcy Southwell
>
> Seconded by:
>
>
>
> WHEREAS:
>
> a) The GNSO Council adopted the charter for a Cross Community
Working Group to discuss Internet governance (CWG-IG) issues affecting
ICANN and make recommendations to the chartering organization on these
issues on 15 October 2014, and as such became a Chartering Organization.
>
> b) The Charter foresees that ?At each ICANN Annual General
Meeting, starting 2014, the Charter and deliverables of the WG shall be
reviewed by the participating SO?s and AC?s to determine whether the WG
should continue, or, close and be dissolved. Consistent with ICANN
community practices, the WG will continue if at least two of the
participating SO?s or AC?s extend the Charter of the WG and notify the
other participating SO?s and AC?s accordingly one month after the annual
review date?.
>
> c) The CWG-IG provided its first written status update on 23
June 2016 (see
https://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/ccwg-internet-governance-23jun16-en.pdf).
>
> d) The GNSO Council recently adopted the ?Uniform Framework of
Principles and Recommendations for Cross Community Working Groups? (CWG
Framework) which details the lifecycle of a CCWG including initiation,
formation, operation, decision-making, adoption of Final Report by
Chartering Organizations and closure of CCWG, and post-closure of CCWG.
>
> e) The GNSO Council has observed that the CWG-IG does not follow
this lifecycle, nor has it established or adopted an initial work plan
and associated schedule as foreseen in its Charter.
>
> f) The GNSO Council recognizes the importance of a continued
dialogue and discussion in relation to the topic of Internet Governance
within an ICANN context.
>
> g) The GNSO Council has shared its concerns with the ccNSO
Council and representatives of other SO/ACs on the subject of this CWG
and its future.
>
>
>
> RESOLVED:
>
> a) The GNSO Council will continue to participate as a Chartering
Organization for the CWG-IG. However, this participation is conditioned
upon a comprehensive review of the CWG-IG Charter by the CWG-IG, in
accordance with the CWG Framework
(http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/uniform-framework-principles-recommendations-16sep16-en.pdf).
In particular, the GNSO Council expects future work to be subject to a
clear work plan, with regular updates and clear deliverables.
>
> b) The GNSO Council expects that the CWG-IG will present by
ICANN58 a report on its findings, which may include a revised charter or
a recommendation to reconstitute the group under a new structure.
>
> c) Following the submission of the CWG-IG report, the GNSO
Council will consider the recommendations and decide whether or not it
will continue as a Chartering Organization.
>
> d) The GNSO Secretariat will communicate this decision to the
CWG-IG Chairs as well as the other Chartering Organizations.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20161214/4c1799e7/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance
More information about the NCSG-PC
mailing list