[PC-NCSG] Fwd: Re: [ccwg-internet-governance] Fwd: [council] AMENDMENT - Motion on Conditional Participation of the GNSO as a Chartering Organization for CCWG-IG

[Stephanie Perrin]

sorry to spam you all, but another issue we need to discuss....

SP



-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: 	Re: [ccwg-internet-governance] Fwd: [council] AMENDMENT - 
Motion on Conditional Participation of the GNSO as a Chartering 
Organization for CCWG-IG
Date: 	Wed, 14 Dec 2016 16:10:39 +0000
From: 	Drazek, Keith <kdrazek at verisign.com>
To: 	ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org 
<ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org>



Hi all,

Is there a plan to get this process started? Copenhagen will be here 
before we know it.

Regards,

Keith

Keith Drazek

Vice President

Public Policy & Government Relations

Verisign, Inc.

+1-571-377-9182

kdrazek at verisign.com <mailto:kdrazek at verisign.com>

*From:*ccwg-internet-governance-bounces at icann.org 
[mailto:ccwg-internet-governance-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Rafik 
Dammak
*Sent:* Monday, November 07, 2016 4:10 AM
*To:* ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
*Subject:* [ccwg-internet-governance] Fwd: [council] AMENDMENT - Motion 
on Conditional Participation of the GNSO as a Chartering Organization 
for CCWG-IG

Hi everyone,

GNSO council just approved unanimously this motion. It is still 
chartering organization but we got work to do by Copenhagen meeting.

Best,

Rafik
---
 >
 > 2.         MOTION ? Conditional participation of the GNSO as a 
Chartering Organization for the Cross Community Working Group to discuss 
Internet governance (CWG-IG) issues affecting ICANN
 >
 > Made by: Darcy Southwell
 >
 > Seconded by:
 >
 >
 >
 > WHEREAS:
 >
 > a)      The GNSO Council adopted the charter for a Cross Community 
Working Group to discuss Internet governance (CWG-IG) issues affecting 
ICANN and make recommendations to the chartering organization on these 
issues on 15 October 2014, and as such became a Chartering Organization.
 >
 > b)      The Charter foresees that ?At each ICANN Annual General 
Meeting, starting 2014, the Charter and deliverables of the WG shall be 
reviewed by the participating SO?s and AC?s to determine whether the WG 
should continue, or, close and be dissolved. Consistent with ICANN 
community practices, the WG will continue if at least two of the 
participating SO?s or AC?s extend the Charter of the WG and notify the 
other participating SO?s and AC?s accordingly one month after the annual 
review date?.
 >
 > c)      The CWG-IG provided its first written status update on 23 
June 2016 (see 
https://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/ccwg-internet-governance-23jun16-en.pdf).
 >
 > d)      The GNSO Council recently adopted the ?Uniform Framework of 
Principles and Recommendations for Cross Community Working Groups? (CWG 
Framework) which details the lifecycle of a CCWG including initiation, 
formation, operation, decision-making, adoption of Final Report by 
Chartering Organizations and closure of CCWG, and post-closure of CCWG.
 >
 > e)      The GNSO Council has observed that the CWG-IG does not follow 
this lifecycle, nor has it established or adopted an initial work plan 
and associated schedule as foreseen in its Charter.
 >
 > f)       The GNSO Council recognizes the importance of a continued 
dialogue and discussion in relation to the topic of Internet Governance 
within an ICANN context.
 >
 > g)      The GNSO Council has shared its concerns with the ccNSO 
Council and representatives of other SO/ACs on the subject of this CWG 
and its future.
 >
 >
 >
 > RESOLVED:
 >
 > a)      The GNSO Council will continue to participate as a Chartering 
Organization for the CWG-IG. However, this participation is conditioned 
upon a comprehensive review of the CWG-IG Charter by the CWG-IG, in 
accordance with the CWG Framework 
(http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/uniform-framework-principles-recommendations-16sep16-en.pdf). 
In particular, the GNSO Council expects future work to be subject to a 
clear work plan, with regular updates and clear deliverables.
 >
 > b)      The GNSO Council expects that the CWG-IG will present by 
ICANN58 a report on its findings, which may include a revised charter or 
a recommendation to reconstitute the group under a new structure.
 >
 > c)      Following the submission of the CWG-IG report, the GNSO 
Council will consider the recommendations and decide whether or not it 
will continue as a Chartering Organization.
 >
 > d)      The GNSO Secretariat will communicate this decision to the 
CWG-IG Chairs as well as the other Chartering Organizations.
 >
 >

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20161214/4c1799e7/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance