[PC-NCSG] [council] Call for Volunteers: GNSO Review Working Group
Stephanie Perrin
stephanie.perrin
Tue Aug 23 02:06:03 EEST 2016
well if I did not make the cut how can I get approved as say the
alternate by pc committee? doesnt PC have to work with the list of
approved volunteers who did it by the deadline (or could they pick a NOTA?)
SP Anyway as long as we have reps that is all I care about.
On 2016-08-22 18:11, matthew shears wrote:
>
> Thanks Amr - are any of those currently on the list willing to step
> forward and be considered for primary and alternate roles?
>
> If not I agree that we should circulate to the list unless there are
> other suggestions.
>
> Matthew
>
>
> On 22/08/2016 23:10, Amr Elsadr wrote:
>> That?s right Rafik. Folks had the opportunity to sign up
>> individually, but the NCSG still has to officially appoint the
>> primary and alternate reps to the WG.
>>
>> I got a list from staff of folks who?ve signed up already, and the
>> ones I could identify from NCSG are Rafik, Avri, Pascal Bekono and
>> myself. Stephanie?, looks like you didn?t make it, having signed up
>> after the deadline, but you may have a second bite at the apple if
>> you are selected by this committee.
>>
>> Maybe we should circulate a call for volunteers to the NCSG-DISCUSS list?
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Amr
>>
>>> On Aug 22, 2016, at 11:51 PM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at GMAIL.COM
>>> <mailto:rafik.dammak at GMAIL.COM>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I signed-up, I think PC still has to appoint a representative and
>>> alternate.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> Rafik
>>>
>>>
>>> On Aug 23, 2016 6:04 AM, "Amr Elsadr" <aelsadr at egyptig.org
>>> <mailto:aelsadr at egyptig.org>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Just wanted to raise this here. I don?t recall that we?ve dealt
>>> with this in the PC capacity. I don?t know who?s signed up for
>>> this, but the NCSG PC needs to appoint a primary and alternate
>>> member to this WG.
>>>
>>> I?ll try to find out who signed up from NCSG.
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> Amr
>>>
>>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>>
>>>> *From: *Nathalie Peregrine <nathalie.peregrine at icann.org
>>>> <mailto:nathalie.peregrine at icann.org>>
>>>> *Subject: **[council] Call for Volunteers: GNSO Review Working
>>>> Group*
>>>> *Date: *July 27, 2016 at 9:42:22 AM GMT+2
>>>> *To: *"council at gnso.icann.org <mailto:council at gnso.icann.org>"
>>>> <council at gnso.icann.org <mailto:council at gnso.icann.org>>
>>>> *Cc: *"gnso-secs at icann.org <mailto:gnso-secs at icann.org>"
>>>> <gnso-secs at icann.org <mailto:gnso-secs at icann.org>>
>>>>
>>>> *
>>>> Call for Volunteers: GNSO Review Working Group*
>>>> **
>>>> */In Brief/*
>>>>
>>>> The Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO) Council
>>>> adopted theCharter
>>>> <http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/gnso-review-charter-11jul16-en.pdf>of
>>>> the GNSO Review Working Group during its meeting on 21 July
>>>> 2016. This Working Group is tasked to develop an implementation
>>>> plan for theGNSO Review recommendations
>>>> <http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/review-feasibility-prioritization-25feb16-en.pdf>which
>>>> were recentlyadopted
>>>> <https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-06-25-en#2.e>by
>>>> the ICANN Board. This is the Call for Volunteers to join this
>>>> Working Group. Anyone interested in the GNSO Review and
>>>> contributing to the development of the implementation plan and
>>>> subsequent implementation is encouraged to volunteer.
>>>> **
>>>> */What This Working Group Will Do/*
>>>> **
>>>> Per the GNSO Review Working GroupCharter
>>>> <http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/gnso-review-charter-11jul16-en.pdf>the
>>>> GNSO Review Working Group will be responsible for developing an
>>>> implementation plan, containing a realistic timeline for the
>>>> implementation, definition of desired outcomes and a way to
>>>> measure current state as well as progress toward the desired
>>>> outcome for the GNSO Review recommendations adopted by the
>>>> ICANN Board (thirty-four (34) recommendations of theFinal
>>>> Report
>>>> <https://www.icann.org/zh/system/files/files/gnso-review-final-summary-15sep15-en.pdf>of
>>>> the Independent Examiner (i.e. all recommendations excluding
>>>> recommendations 23 and 32). This implementation plan is to be
>>>> submitted for approval to the GNSO Council, followed by
>>>> consideration by the ICANN Board. Following the approval of the
>>>> implementation plan, the Working Group is also expected to
>>>> execute and oversee the implementation of the GNSO Review
>>>> recommendations unless specified differently in the
>>>> implementation plan.
>>>>
>>>> The GNSO Review Working Group will also be responsible for
>>>> considering any new requests^^[1] by the GNSO Council
>>>> concerning issues related to the GNSO Council processes and
>>>> procedures and to Working Group guidelines that have been
>>>> identified either by the GNSO Council, or a group chartered by
>>>> the GNSO Council, as needing discussion. However, the first
>>>> priority of the Working Group will be the development of an
>>>> implementation plan and the subsequent implementation of the
>>>> GNSO Review recommendations.
>>>>
>>>> *Timeline and Deliverables*
>>>>
>>>> The GNSO Review Working Group is expected to deliver the
>>>> implementation plan to the GNSO Council for consideration at
>>>> the GNSO Council meeting at ICANN57 at the latest in order to
>>>> meet the Board set objective of ?an implementation plan,
>>>> containing a realistic timeline for the implementation,
>>>> definition of desired outcomes and a way to measure current
>>>> state as well as progress toward the desired outcome, shall be
>>>> submitted to the Board as soon as possible, but no later than
>>>> six (6) months after the adoption of this resolution?^^[2]
>>>> i.e., December 2016.
>>>>
>>>> */How to Join/*
>>>> Each GNSO Stakeholder Group and/or Constituency will identify
>>>> one primary and one alternate member to serve on the GNSO
>>>> Review Working Group. In addition to these appointed members,
>>>> anyone interested will be able to join this working group as a
>>>> participant or observer. Please note that participants are
>>>> expected to attend conference calls and to actively participate
>>>> in online discussions. They also must submit a Statement of
>>>> Interest per Section 5.0 of theGNSO Operating Procedures
>>>> <http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/op-procedures-16feb16-en.pdf>.
>>>> Observers can follow the group's work on the mailing list but
>>>> can neither send to the mailing list nor participate actively
>>>> in the calls.
>>>> Interested participants and observers are requested to complete
>>>> thesign-up sheet <https://goo.gl/forms/TbmkrEXT2xlx6jGn1>by
>>>> Friday, 19 August 2016.
>>>>
>>>> */Next steps/***
>>>>
>>>> It is anticipated that the GNSO Review Working Group will
>>>> convene online for the first time in the last week of August
>>>> 2016. Following that, regular online meetings will be scheduled
>>>> in accordance with the Working Group?s work plan, which it is
>>>> expected to develop as one of its first tasks.
>>>> *//*
>>>> */Further information and preparation/***
>>>>
>>>> For those interested in volunteering for this effort, you are
>>>> encouraged to review the following materials:
>>>> 1.GNSO Review Recommendations
>>>> <http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/review-feasibility-prioritization-25feb16-en.pdf>
>>>> 2.Independent Examiner Final Report
>>>> <https://www.icann.org/zh/system/files/files/gnso-review-final-summary-15sep15-en.pdf>
>>>> 3.Frequently Asked Questions <https://community.icann.org/x/UBCbAw>
>>>> */Background/***
>>>>
>>>> The second independent review of the GNSO commenced in 2014.
>>>> The Final Report of the independent examiner was published on
>>>> 15 September 2015
>>>> (seehttps://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/gnso-review-final-15sep15-en.pdf
>>>> <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/gnso-review-final-15sep15-en.pdf>)
>>>> and contained 36 recommendations in the areas of: participation
>>>> & representation, continuous development, transparency and
>>>> alignment with ICANN's future. The GNSO Council adopted the
>>>> GNSO Review Recommendations Feasibility and Prioritization
>>>> analysis
>>>> (see:http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/review-feasibility-prioritization-25feb16-en.pdf
>>>> <http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/review-feasibility-prioritization-25feb16-en.pdf>)
>>>> on 14 April 2016 with the modification of Recommendation 21,
>>>> that the council recommends staff working with the GNSO to
>>>> institute methods of information sharing of highly relevant
>>>> research related to gTLDs to help the GNSO community members
>>>> increase their knowledge base (low priority).
>>>> On 25 June, the ICANN Board accepted the Final Report from the
>>>> independent examiner, taking into account the GNSO Working
>>>> Party's Feasibility and Prioritization Analysis of the GNSO
>>>> Review Recommendations, adopted with modifications by the GNSO
>>>> Council. The Board adopted thirty-four (34) recommendations of
>>>> the Final Report (i.e. all recommendations excluding
>>>> recommendations 23 and 32). Furthermore, the Board requested
>>>> that the GNSO Council convene a group that oversees the
>>>> implementation of Board-accepted recommendations.
>>>> Per themotion <https://community.icann.org/x/BAObAw>adopted on
>>>> 21 July 2016, the GNSO Council adopted theCharter
>>>> <http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/gnso-review-charter-11jul16-en.pdf>of
>>>> the GNSO Review Working Group and directed staff to send a Call
>>>> for Volunteers for the Working Group.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> [1]For items that are submitted for review 'on request', the
>>>> GNSO Review WG expects to receive detailed input from the group
>>>> affected by theprocess/operational change concerned. See
>>>> request template
>>>> at:https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/14713135/GNSO-SCI-ReviewRequest-yyymmdd_template.docx?version=1&modificationDate=1469143165000&api=v2
>>>> <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/14713135/GNSO-SCI-ReviewRequest-yyymmdd_template.docx?version=1&modificationDate=1469143165000&api=v2>.
>>>> [2]The Board resolution was adopted on 25 June 2016
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>> <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>
> --
> --------------
> Matthew Shears
> Global Internet Policy and Human Rights
> Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT)
> + 44 771 2472987
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20160822/ffcd3cf0/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the NCSG-PC
mailing list