[PC-NCSG] [council] Call for Volunteers: GNSO Review Working Group
matthew shears
mshears
Tue Aug 23 01:11:22 EEST 2016
Thanks Amr - are any of those currently on the list willing to step
forward and be considered for primary and alternate roles?
If not I agree that we should circulate to the list unless there are
other suggestions.
Matthew
On 22/08/2016 23:10, Amr Elsadr wrote:
> That?s right Rafik. Folks had the opportunity to sign up individually,
> but the NCSG still has to officially appoint the primary and alternate
> reps to the WG.
>
> I got a list from staff of folks who?ve signed up already, and the
> ones I could identify from NCSG are Rafik, Avri, Pascal Bekono and
> myself. Stephanie?, looks like you didn?t make it, having signed up
> after the deadline, but you may have a second bite at the apple if you
> are selected by this committee.
>
> Maybe we should circulate a call for volunteers to the NCSG-DISCUSS list?
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Amr
>
>> On Aug 22, 2016, at 11:51 PM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at GMAIL.COM
>> <mailto:rafik.dammak at GMAIL.COM>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I signed-up, I think PC still has to appoint a representative and
>> alternate.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Rafik
>>
>>
>> On Aug 23, 2016 6:04 AM, "Amr Elsadr" <aelsadr at egyptig.org
>> <mailto:aelsadr at egyptig.org>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Just wanted to raise this here. I don?t recall that we?ve dealt
>> with this in the PC capacity. I don?t know who?s signed up for
>> this, but the NCSG PC needs to appoint a primary and alternate
>> member to this WG.
>>
>> I?ll try to find out who signed up from NCSG.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Amr
>>
>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>
>>> *From: *Nathalie Peregrine <nathalie.peregrine at icann.org
>>> <mailto:nathalie.peregrine at icann.org>>
>>> *Subject: **[council] Call for Volunteers: GNSO Review Working
>>> Group*
>>> *Date: *July 27, 2016 at 9:42:22 AM GMT+2
>>> *To: *"council at gnso.icann.org <mailto:council at gnso.icann.org>"
>>> <council at gnso.icann.org <mailto:council at gnso.icann.org>>
>>> *Cc: *"gnso-secs at icann.org <mailto:gnso-secs at icann.org>"
>>> <gnso-secs at icann.org <mailto:gnso-secs at icann.org>>
>>>
>>> *
>>> Call for Volunteers: GNSO Review Working Group*
>>> **
>>> */In Brief/*
>>>
>>> The Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO) Council adopted
>>> theCharter
>>> <http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/gnso-review-charter-11jul16-en.pdf>of
>>> the GNSO Review Working Group during its meeting on 21 July
>>> 2016. This Working Group is tasked to develop an implementation
>>> plan for theGNSO Review recommendations
>>> <http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/review-feasibility-prioritization-25feb16-en.pdf>which
>>> were recentlyadopted
>>> <https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-06-25-en#2.e>by
>>> the ICANN Board. This is the Call for Volunteers to join this
>>> Working Group. Anyone interested in the GNSO Review and
>>> contributing to the development of the implementation plan and
>>> subsequent implementation is encouraged to volunteer.
>>> **
>>> */What This Working Group Will Do/*
>>> **
>>> Per the GNSO Review Working GroupCharter
>>> <http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/gnso-review-charter-11jul16-en.pdf>the
>>> GNSO Review Working Group will be responsible for developing an
>>> implementation plan, containing a realistic timeline for the
>>> implementation, definition of desired outcomes and a way to
>>> measure current state as well as progress toward the desired
>>> outcome for the GNSO Review recommendations adopted by the ICANN
>>> Board (thirty-four (34) recommendations of theFinal Report
>>> <https://www.icann.org/zh/system/files/files/gnso-review-final-summary-15sep15-en.pdf>of
>>> the Independent Examiner (i.e. all recommendations excluding
>>> recommendations 23 and 32). This implementation plan is to be
>>> submitted for approval to the GNSO Council, followed by
>>> consideration by the ICANN Board. Following the approval of the
>>> implementation plan, the Working Group is also expected to
>>> execute and oversee the implementation of the GNSO Review
>>> recommendations unless specified differently in the
>>> implementation plan.
>>>
>>> The GNSO Review Working Group will also be responsible for
>>> considering any new requests^^[1] by the GNSO Council concerning
>>> issues related to the GNSO Council processes and procedures and
>>> to Working Group guidelines that have been identified either by
>>> the GNSO Council, or a group chartered by the GNSO Council, as
>>> needing discussion. However, the first priority of the Working
>>> Group will be the development of an implementation plan and the
>>> subsequent implementation of the GNSO Review recommendations.
>>>
>>> *Timeline and Deliverables*
>>>
>>> The GNSO Review Working Group is expected to deliver the
>>> implementation plan to the GNSO Council for consideration at the
>>> GNSO Council meeting at ICANN57 at the latest in order to meet
>>> the Board set objective of ?an implementation plan, containing a
>>> realistic timeline for the implementation, definition of desired
>>> outcomes and a way to measure current state as well as progress
>>> toward the desired outcome, shall be submitted to the Board as
>>> soon as possible, but no later than six (6) months after the
>>> adoption of this resolution?^^[2] i.e., December 2016.
>>>
>>> */How to Join/*
>>> Each GNSO Stakeholder Group and/or Constituency will identify
>>> one primary and one alternate member to serve on the GNSO Review
>>> Working Group. In addition to these appointed members, anyone
>>> interested will be able to join this working group as a
>>> participant or observer. Please note that participants are
>>> expected to attend conference calls and to actively participate
>>> in online discussions. They also must submit a Statement of
>>> Interest per Section 5.0 of theGNSO Operating Procedures
>>> <http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/op-procedures-16feb16-en.pdf>.
>>> Observers can follow the group's work on the mailing list but
>>> can neither send to the mailing list nor participate actively in
>>> the calls.
>>> Interested participants and observers are requested to complete
>>> thesign-up sheet <https://goo.gl/forms/TbmkrEXT2xlx6jGn1>by
>>> Friday, 19 August 2016.
>>>
>>> */Next steps/***
>>>
>>> It is anticipated that the GNSO Review Working Group will
>>> convene online for the first time in the last week of August
>>> 2016. Following that, regular online meetings will be scheduled
>>> in accordance with the Working Group?s work plan, which it is
>>> expected to develop as one of its first tasks.
>>> *//*
>>> */Further information and preparation/***
>>>
>>> For those interested in volunteering for this effort, you are
>>> encouraged to review the following materials:
>>> 1.GNSO Review Recommendations
>>> <http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/review-feasibility-prioritization-25feb16-en.pdf>
>>> 2.Independent Examiner Final Report
>>> <https://www.icann.org/zh/system/files/files/gnso-review-final-summary-15sep15-en.pdf>
>>> 3.Frequently Asked Questions <https://community.icann.org/x/UBCbAw>
>>> */Background/***
>>>
>>> The second independent review of the GNSO commenced in 2014.
>>> The Final Report of the independent examiner was published on 15
>>> September 2015
>>> (seehttps://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/gnso-review-final-15sep15-en.pdf
>>> <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/gnso-review-final-15sep15-en.pdf>)
>>> and contained 36 recommendations in the areas of: participation
>>> & representation, continuous development, transparency and
>>> alignment with ICANN's future. The GNSO Council adopted the
>>> GNSO Review Recommendations Feasibility and Prioritization
>>> analysis
>>> (see:http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/review-feasibility-prioritization-25feb16-en.pdf
>>> <http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/review-feasibility-prioritization-25feb16-en.pdf>)
>>> on 14 April 2016 with the modification of Recommendation 21,
>>> that the council recommends staff working with the GNSO to
>>> institute methods of information sharing of highly relevant
>>> research related to gTLDs to help the GNSO community members
>>> increase their knowledge base (low priority).
>>> On 25 June, the ICANN Board accepted the Final Report from the
>>> independent examiner, taking into account the GNSO Working
>>> Party's Feasibility and Prioritization Analysis of the GNSO
>>> Review Recommendations, adopted with modifications by the GNSO
>>> Council. The Board adopted thirty-four (34) recommendations of
>>> the Final Report (i.e. all recommendations excluding
>>> recommendations 23 and 32). Furthermore, the Board requested
>>> that the GNSO Council convene a group that oversees the
>>> implementation of Board-accepted recommendations.
>>> Per themotion <https://community.icann.org/x/BAObAw>adopted on
>>> 21 July 2016, the GNSO Council adopted theCharter
>>> <http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/gnso-review-charter-11jul16-en.pdf>of
>>> the GNSO Review Working Group and directed staff to send a Call
>>> for Volunteers for the Working Group.
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> [1]For items that are submitted for review 'on request', the
>>> GNSO Review WG expects to receive detailed input from the group
>>> affected by theprocess/operational change concerned. See request
>>> template
>>> at:https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/14713135/GNSO-SCI-ReviewRequest-yyymmdd_template.docx?version=1&modificationDate=1469143165000&api=v2
>>> <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/14713135/GNSO-SCI-ReviewRequest-yyymmdd_template.docx?version=1&modificationDate=1469143165000&api=v2>.
>>> [2]The Board resolution was adopted on 25 June 2016
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>> <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg>
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
--
--------------
Matthew Shears
Global Internet Policy and Human Rights
Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT)
+ 44 771 2472987
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20160822/02651017/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the NCSG-PC
mailing list