[PC-NCSG] Fwd: [council] FW: [Correspondence] Letter from Steve Crocker to James Bladel, Chair, GNSO Council

[avri doria]

Hi,


Recommend one change, 


We should not proceed with new rounds before the review process and the
PDP are completed.


thnaks

avri


On 11-Aug-16 10:27, Stephanie Perrin wrote:
>
> Understood.  Hints on how to word that in the most conciliatory way
> appreciated.  How about:  It is the view of the NCSG that rushing the
> gTLD SubPro group will not help it to go faster, and may undermine the
> process. We should not proceed with new rounds before the review
> process is complete.
>
> cheers SP
>
>
> On 2016-08-10 23:24, avri doria wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> - Rushing the gTLD SubPro group is not going to make it go faster.
>>
>> And the Council ought not try to decide to go with new rounds before the
>> process is completed.
>>
>> Registries are pushing for new rounds as soon as possible, but we really
>> ought to work though the process.
>>
>>
>> avri
>>
>> On 10-Aug-16 22:38, Stephanie Perrin wrote:
>>> fyi, pleased to reflect any views back to James on this matter.
>>>
>>> Steph
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>>> Subject: 	[council] FW: [Correspondence] Letter from Steve Crocker to
>>> James Bladel, Chair, GNSO Council
>>> Date: 	Wed, 10 Aug 2016 23:13:02 +0000
>>> From: 	James M. Bladel <jbladel at godaddy.com>
>>> To: 	GNSO Council List <council at gnso.icann.org>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Microsoft Word - 2016-08-05-Steve-Crocker-to-James-Bladel.docx
>>> Councilors -
>>>
>>> Attached, please find a letter form Steve Crocker/ICANN Board to the
>>> Council, regarding the work on subsequent rounds of New gTLDs.   (Per
>>> Wendy?s note, the letter has not yet been posted on the ICANN
>>> Correspondence page, but expected soon). 
>>>
>>> Note that the letter contains a specific request to the GNSO:
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> /?For example, assuming all other review activities are completed, it
>>> would be helpful to understand whether the GNSO believes that the
>>> entirety of the current Subsequent Procedures PDP must be completed
>>> prior to advancing a new application process under the current policy
>>> recommendations. The Board is cognizant that it may be difficult to
>>> provide a firm answer at this stage of the process as the reviews are
>>> still underway and the PDP is in its initial stages of work, but if
>>> any consideration has been given in relation to whether a future
>>> application process could proceed while policy work continues and be
>>> iteratively applied to the process for allocating new gTLDs, or that a
>>> set of critical issues could be identified to be addressed prior to a
>>> new application process, the Board would welcome that input./
>>>
>>>  /The Board would also welcome any elaboration on the expected time
>>> frame outlined in the PDP Work Plan, as well as any additional points
>>> the GNSO might wish to clarify for the Board in its efforts to support
>>> the various areas of work underway in the multistakeholder community?./
>>>
>>> I propose that we add this question/topic, and the letter itself, to
>>> our 1 SEP meeting agenda as a discussion item, and that we examine
>>> ideas on how to proceed on responding to this question. If this is
>>> amenable, I would also ask Staff to draft a brief note to Steve,
>>> acknowledging the receipt of this letter and noting that it would be
>>> discussed during our next meeting.
>>>
>>> Thoughts on this approach?
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>>
>>> J.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> From: Wendy Profit <wendy.profit at icann.org
>>> <mailto:wendy.profit at icann.org>>
>>> Date: Friday, August 5, 2016 at 14:19
>>> To: James Bladel <jbladel at godaddy.com <mailto:jbladel at godaddy.com>>,
>>> Glen de Saint G?ry <gnso-secretariat at gnso.icann.org
>>> <mailto:gnso-secretariat at gnso.icann.org>>, Marika Konings
>>> <marika.konings at icann.org <mailto:marika.konings at icann.org>>
>>> Cc: Steve Crocker <steve.crocker at board.icann.org
>>> <mailto:steve.crocker at board.icann.org>>, Icann-board ICANN
>>> <icann-board at icann.org <mailto:icann-board at icann.org>>, board-support
>>> <board-support at icann.org <mailto:board-support at icann.org>>, Akram
>>> Atallah <akram.atallah at icann.org <mailto:akram.atallah at icann.org>>,
>>> Erika Randall <erika.randall at icann.org
>>> <mailto:erika.randall at icann.org>>, Daniel Halloran
>>> <daniel.halloran at icann.org <mailto:daniel.halloran at icann.org>>, Eleeza
>>> Agopian <eleeza.agopian at icann.org <mailto:eleeza.agopian at icann.org>>,
>>> Jamie Hedlund <jamie.hedlund at icann.org
>>> <mailto:jamie.hedlund at icann.org>>, Karen Lentz <karen.lentz at icann.org
>>> <mailto:karen.lentz at icann.org>>, Cyrus Namazi <cyrus.namazi at icann.org
>>> <mailto:cyrus.namazi at icann.org>>, Cristina Flores
>>> <cristina.flores at icann.org <mailto:cristina.flores at icann.org>>
>>> Subject: [Correspondence] Letter from Steve Crocker to James Bladel,
>>> Chair, GNSO Council
>>>
>>> Dear James Bladel,
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> Please find the attached letter from Steve Crocker, Chair, ICANN Board
>>> of Directors regarding subsequent New gTLD rounds.
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> The letter will be posted shortly to the ICANN Correspondence and New
>>> gTLD Correspondence pages:
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/correspondence
>>>
>>> https://newgtlds.icann.org/en/program-status/correspondence
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> With warm regards,
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> Wendy Profit
>>>
>>> ICANN Board Operations Specialist
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>> ---
>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus