[PC-NCSG] [urgent] NCPH candidate nomination

[Rafik Dammak]

Hi,

Ok I think I will go with that and inform Steve.

Rafik
On Sep 25, 2015 9:56 PM, "Marilia Maciel" <mariliamaciel at gmail.com> wrote:

> Agree with the approach, Rafik.
> M
>
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 10:09 AM, Amr Elsadr <aelsadr at egyptig.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thanks for this Rafik. I agree on all counts. Lets move forward with
>> nominating Heather, and hopefully get this done today with no extension to
>> the deadline.
>>
>> I had asked for this to be discussed during the council meeting under
>> AoB, but was disconnected so did not have the chance to bring it up. Not
>> sure if somebody else did, or not. It seems it won?t be necessary after all.
>>
>> Thanks again.
>>
>> Amr
>>
>> > On Sep 25, 2015, at 4:55 AM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at GMAIL.COM>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi everyone,
>> >
>> > checking with Keith, CPH is going to nominate James Bladel.
>> > as mentioned several times, voting is not coupled with nomination
>> process. We can go with nominating Heather since we are not proposing any
>> alternative (we had the opportunity to do so) and we will decide for the
>> votes later, more carefully. there will opportunities to discuss with
>> candidates and personally I think we have to weight all options.
>> >
>> > for the nomination deadline extension , I don't think that is needed
>> with the current status. I don't know what was the reaction in GNSO council
>> and what was decided.
>> >
>> > looking to hear from you so I can send the response to Steve M and do
>> the nomination before the deadline.
>> >
>> > best,
>> >
>> > Rafik
>> >
>> > 2015-09-25 0:52 GMT+09:00 Amr Elsadr <aelsadr at egyptig.org>:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > > On Sep 24, 2015, at 5:32 PM, Marilia Maciel <mariliamaciel at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Thanks for clarifying your substantive issues, Amr.
>> > >
>> > > Trying to be pragmatic here, I believe that Rafik asked us about the
>> nomination. Although different people have raised reasons why they would
>> consider not voting for the candidate, I still did not see someone saying
>> that they would be against the nomination. Or did I get it wrong?
>> >
>> > No?, I don?t think you got it wrong?, and I pretty much agree with you.
>> Have just been thinking out loud so that my personal thoughts and concerns
>> are on the record.
>> >
>> > > A request for an extension on making this decision beyond tomorrow
>> (the initially agreed deadline) only forces the hand of the CPH to put
>> forward a name. Is that our strategy?
>> >
>> > Not mine. :) If we manage before the deadline, all the better. I also
>> suspect the CPH will put forward a name regardless of what we do on our
>> side of the GNSO.
>> >
>> > Thanks.
>> >
>> > Amr
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > PC-NCSG mailing list
>> > PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>> > http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>> >
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>
>
>
>
> --
> *Mar?lia Maciel*
> Pesquisadora Gestora - Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade - FGV Direito Rio
> Researcher and Coordinator - Center for Technology & Society - FGV Law
> School
> http://direitorio.fgv.br/cts
>
> DiploFoundation associate - www.diplomacy.edu
> PoliTICs Magazine Advisory Committee - http://www.politics.org.br/
> Subscribe "Digital Rights: Latin America & the Caribbean" -
> http://www.digitalrightslac.net/en
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20150925/c8328071/attachment-0001.html>