[PC-NCSG] [urgent] NCPH candidate nomination

[Marilia Maciel]

Agree with the approach, Rafik.
M

On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 10:09 AM, Amr Elsadr <aelsadr at egyptig.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Thanks for this Rafik. I agree on all counts. Lets move forward with
> nominating Heather, and hopefully get this done today with no extension to
> the deadline.
>
> I had asked for this to be discussed during the council meeting under AoB,
> but was disconnected so did not have the chance to bring it up. Not sure if
> somebody else did, or not. It seems it won?t be necessary after all.
>
> Thanks again.
>
> Amr
>
> > On Sep 25, 2015, at 4:55 AM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at GMAIL.COM>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > checking with Keith, CPH is going to nominate James Bladel.
> > as mentioned several times, voting is not coupled with nomination
> process. We can go with nominating Heather since we are not proposing any
> alternative (we had the opportunity to do so) and we will decide for the
> votes later, more carefully. there will opportunities to discuss with
> candidates and personally I think we have to weight all options.
> >
> > for the nomination deadline extension , I don't think that is needed
> with the current status. I don't know what was the reaction in GNSO council
> and what was decided.
> >
> > looking to hear from you so I can send the response to Steve M and do
> the nomination before the deadline.
> >
> > best,
> >
> > Rafik
> >
> > 2015-09-25 0:52 GMT+09:00 Amr Elsadr <aelsadr at egyptig.org>:
> > Hi,
> >
> > > On Sep 24, 2015, at 5:32 PM, Marilia Maciel <mariliamaciel at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks for clarifying your substantive issues, Amr.
> > >
> > > Trying to be pragmatic here, I believe that Rafik asked us about the
> nomination. Although different people have raised reasons why they would
> consider not voting for the candidate, I still did not see someone saying
> that they would be against the nomination. Or did I get it wrong?
> >
> > No?, I don?t think you got it wrong?, and I pretty much agree with you.
> Have just been thinking out loud so that my personal thoughts and concerns
> are on the record.
> >
> > > A request for an extension on making this decision beyond tomorrow
> (the initially agreed deadline) only forces the hand of the CPH to put
> forward a name. Is that our strategy?
> >
> > Not mine. :) If we manage before the deadline, all the better. I also
> suspect the CPH will put forward a name regardless of what we do on our
> side of the GNSO.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Amr
> > _______________________________________________
> > PC-NCSG mailing list
> > PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> > http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>



-- 
*Mar?lia Maciel*
Pesquisadora Gestora - Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade - FGV Direito Rio
Researcher and Coordinator - Center for Technology & Society - FGV Law
School
http://direitorio.fgv.br/cts

DiploFoundation associate - www.diplomacy.edu
PoliTICs Magazine Advisory Committee - http://www.politics.org.br/
Subscribe "Digital Rights: Latin America & the Caribbean" -
http://www.digitalrightslac.net/en
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20150925/d6972f09/attachment.html>