[PC-NCSG] Arguments Rejected

[Rafik Dammak]

Hi,

if I am not mistaking that was the STI and the group was set in Seoul
meeting 2009. that was my first ICANN meeting and I recall that was the hot
topic and how get representatives there.
we got the preliminary issues report and also this one
https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2015-09-11-en , we have to submit a
comment for the former.

Best,

Rafik

2015-10-10 4:11 GMT+09:00 Avri Doria <avri at acm.org>:

>
>
> On 09-Oct-15 14:35, Kathy Kleiman wrote:
> > It went through what would be considered an expedited process, with
> > all constituencies represented.
>
> But that was an ad-hoc process.  Additionally the proposal did not go to
> the GNSO for approval.  It was a Board initiated action and not a PDP
> with open WG and public comments and comment response &c.
>
> But I agree there was a process.
>
> avri
>
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20151010/b1eb40f3/attachment.html>