[PC-NCSG] Arguments Rejected

Avri Doria avri
Fri Oct 9 22:11:36 EEST 2015



On 09-Oct-15 14:35, Kathy Kleiman wrote:
> It went through what would be considered an expedited process, with
> all constituencies represented. 

But that was an ad-hoc process.  Additionally the proposal did not go to
the GNSO for approval.  It was a Board initiated action and not a PDP
with open WG and public comments and comment response &c. 

But I agree there was a process.

avri


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus





More information about the NCSG-PC mailing list