[PC-NCSG] Arguments Rejected
Avri Doria
avri
Fri Oct 9 22:11:36 EEST 2015
On 09-Oct-15 14:35, Kathy Kleiman wrote:
> It went through what would be considered an expedited process, with
> all constituencies represented.
But that was an ad-hoc process. Additionally the proposal did not go to
the GNSO for approval. It was a Board initiated action and not a PDP
with open WG and public comments and comment response &c.
But I agree there was a process.
avri
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
More information about the NCSG-PC
mailing list