[PC-NCSG] Arguments Rejected
    Avri Doria 
    avri
       
    Fri Oct  9 22:11:36 EEST 2015
    
    
  
On 09-Oct-15 14:35, Kathy Kleiman wrote:
> It went through what would be considered an expedited process, with
> all constituencies represented. 
But that was an ad-hoc process.  Additionally the proposal did not go to
the GNSO for approval.  It was a Board initiated action and not a PDP
with open WG and public comments and comment response &c. 
But I agree there was a process.
avri
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
    
    
More information about the NCSG-PC
mailing list