[PC-NCSG] discussing distribution of ICANN material

[Edward Morris]

Hi,


> 
> I really think we should have held a discussion of what materials are
> appropriate to pass on to the NCSG membership in either the EC or the
> PC.  I do not think it appropriate to have berated a staff member

Ms. Doria, you are the one who is personalizing the issue. This is a question of propriety and philosophy: the proper role of staff support to the NCSG. There are obviously differing views on the matter. The identity of the individual staff member is inconsequential as is the intent of any staff member in this role. 

> 
> I think it was cruel and unnecessary.
> 

How about dealing with specifics Avri, instead of gross generalities impugning my intent? What was cruel? What was unnecessary? Indeed, how was an individual berated?

Are you suggesting that when one sees what one believes is staff overreach one needs to be quiet lest someone's feelings be hurt? This is not about any individual person, it's about a wider issue. It's a shame you seem unable to deal with the specifics of the question raised, instead trying to personalize and demonize the individual raising it. You're usually better than that.

Ed


> avri
> 
> 
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> http://www.avast.com
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg