[PC-NCSG] A working group to develop recommendations on new gTLD auction proceeds

Avri Doria avri
Thu Mar 12 15:46:11 EET 2015


Hi,

As a starter position.

I support the idea of a CWG that includes GNSO & ALAC and possibly GAC.

I think the group should:

- collect the various nputs on what should be done
- should gain consensus on the top n possibilities for further
exploration and implementation.

Whether it is a CWG or a GNSO WG, I will volunteer to be involved.

avri


On 12-Mar-15 08:11, Amr Elsadr wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I?ve unintentionally neglected this discussion, but would like to pick
> it up again. We only have a couple of days to send a response, but I
> don?t think it would hurt to let Glen know we?ll be a few days late on
> this one. It isn?t on the agenda for the next Council meeting, so
> maybe asking her for an extra week won?t be too disruptive.
>
> Remember, we?re being asked whether or not the NCSG would be willing
> to participate in a CCWG on this topic. Other SOs/ACs are getting this
> same question. If there is no support from outside the GNSO to do this
> (which I very much doubt), the GNSO will create its own working group
> to address the issue. This WG will, of course, be open to
> participation by anyone.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Amr
>
> On Mar 4, 2015, at 2:57 PM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at GMAIL.COM
> <mailto:rafik.dammak at GMAIL.COM>> wrote:
>
>> Hi ,
>>
>> if it is cross-community WG, I guess that may make sense to have it
>> with ALAC and less with GAC.
>> seeing all statements to get involved in the working group, I guess
>> we have to wait for th idea of group to get traction and to have it
>> formed first :) but I would that such group will be open to everybody
>> to participate.
>>
>> Rafik
>>
>> 2015-03-04 20:52 GMT+09:00 Amr Elsadr <aelsadr at egyptig.org
>> <mailto:aelsadr at egyptig.org>>:
>>
>>     Hi,
>>
>>     I feel the same as Avri. I wonder if anyone has any preferences
>>     on this being a CCWG or a GNSO WG.
>>
>>     Thanks.
>>
>>     Amr
>>
>>     On Mar 4, 2015, at 11:43 AM, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org
>>     <mailto:avri at acm.org>> wrote:
>>
>>>     hi,
>>>
>>>     I am interested but just don't know if i have the bandwidth or
>>>     energy to dive back into this swamp.
>>>
>>>     avri
>>>
>>>
>>>     On 04-Mar-15 10:31, Edward Morris wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     Sent from my iPad
>>>>
>>>>     On Mar 4, 2015, at 5:31 AM, Stephanie Perrin
>>>>     <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca
>>>>     <mailto:stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>     Yes and I want to volunteer for that group.  I am new and have
>>>>>     no baggage from previous resource wars.  I also have
>>>>>     considerable budget planning experience.
>>>>>     cheers SP
>>>>>
>>>>>     On 2015-03-04 0:19, Rafik Dammak wrote:
>>>>>>     Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     we should give an initial response for this : forming a
>>>>>>     working group on new gTLD auctions proceeds.
>>>>>>     I think there were positive comments from our side during
>>>>>>     Singapore meeting and it is something we advocated for for years.
>>>>>>     can we get a short statement to express our support for such
>>>>>>     effort?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     Best,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     Rafik
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>>>     From: *Glen de Saint G?ry* <Glen at icann.org
>>>>>>     <mailto:Glen at icann.org>>
>>>>>>     Date: 2015-03-02 19:14 GMT+09:00
>>>>>>     Subject: A working group to develop recommendations on new
>>>>>>     gTLD auction proceeds
>>>>>>     To: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com
>>>>>>     <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>>
>>>>>>     Cc: Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson at afilias.info
>>>>>>     <mailto:jrobinson at afilias.info>>, Marika Konings
>>>>>>     <marika.konings at icann.org <mailto:marika.konings at icann.org>>,
>>>>>>     "gnso-secs at icann.org <mailto:gnso-secs at icann.org>"
>>>>>>     <gnso-secs at icann.org <mailto:gnso-secs at icann.org>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>      
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     Dear SO/AC Chairs,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>      
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     *A working group to develop recommendations on new gTLD
>>>>>>     auction proceeds*
>>>>>>
>>>>>>      
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     During the GNSO weekend sessions at ICANN 52 in Singapore,
>>>>>>     the GNSO discussed the issue of new gTLD auction proceeds. As
>>>>>>     you know, new gTLD auction proceeds have been building up and
>>>>>>     there is no current plan in place for the use or allocation
>>>>>>     of these funds.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>      
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     In order to commence discussions on a plan for the use of new
>>>>>>     gTLD auction proceeds, the GNSO would like to form a working
>>>>>>     group to develop recommendations on this topic. As such, I am
>>>>>>     reaching out to you to see whether there is an interest to
>>>>>>     form a cross-community working group on this topic. Note,
>>>>>>     should there not be sufficient interest to form a
>>>>>>     cross-community working group at this stage, the GNSO plans
>>>>>>     to form a GNSO working group on this topic which will be open
>>>>>>     to anyone interested to participate in.  Regardless of which
>>>>>>     approach is chosen, it is the GNSO?s expectation that any
>>>>>>     work on this topic will be conducted through an open and
>>>>>>     consultative process allowing everyone interested to
>>>>>>     participate and provide their perspectives.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>      
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     In order to determine the interest from the different
>>>>>>     communities in this topic, I would like to ask you to provide
>>>>>>     an initial response to me by *14 March 2015* at the latest.
>>>>>>     Based on the feedback received, the GNSO Council will
>>>>>>     initially discuss how to proceed at its meeting on 19 March 2015.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>      
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     Sincerely,   
>>>>>>
>>>>>>      
>>>>>>      
>>>>>>      
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     Jonathan Robinson
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     For and on behalf of the ICANN GNSO Council
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>>>>     PC-NCSG mailing list
>>>>>>     PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>>>>>>     http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>>>
>>>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>>>     PC-NCSG mailing list
>>>>>     PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>>>>>     http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>>     PC-NCSG mailing list
>>>>     PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>>>>     http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>     <http://www.avast.com/> 	
>>>
>>>     This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus
>>>     software.
>>>     www.avast.com <http://www.avast.com/>
>>>
>>>
>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>     PC-NCSG mailing list
>>>     PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>>>     http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     PC-NCSG mailing list
>>     PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>>     http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>
>>
>



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20150312/23843a78/attachment-0001.html>



More information about the NCSG-PC mailing list