[PC-NCSG] GNSO DT new ICANN meeting strategy

[Sam Lanfranco]

I endorse Amr's approach here. Get this small piece settled. The 
drafting team is really constrained to only consider the structure of 
the meetings.

The content, processes, and outcomes will be driven by the stakeholder 
groups, including the constituencies within NCSG and elsewhere.

  What the drafting team, and ICANN staff, can do is enable (hopefully 
not constrain) that work. It is in the work itself where we, the SGs and 
constituencies, take the lead.

I earlier added my name as a candidate but now differ to Rafik's name, 
and will turn my attentions to the constituency interests around 
content, process and outcomes here.

Sam

On 2015-03-05 10:15 AM, Amr Elsadr wrote:
> Hi,
> /As interesting as this conversation is, I would like to use my 
> prerogative as PC Chair to shift focus to what the PC needs to do; the 
> appointment of an NCSG representative to the drafting team. Rafik 
> volunteered to do this. I would appreciate views on this, including if 
> others feel there is another candidate who would be willing and 
> appropriate for consideration./
> I would like to make clear that it is the duty of the PC to make this 
> appointment on behalf of the full NCSG, and not on behalf of any of 
> its constituencies. I suggest that NCUC and NPOC take up the matter of 
> their own appointments directly with staff, if they so wish.
> This discussion certainly has value, and perhaps can be taken up on 
> another thread. I think it would be ideally take place on 
> NCSG-DISCUSS, not here.
> Thanks.
> Amr

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20150305/0546220d/attachment.html>