[PC-NCSG] Fwd: Public Comment on Reviews Schedule

[Edward Morris]

Hi everyone,

I'm passing on this message from Grace in the hope we could generate a few personal comments on this issue. James has kindly volunteered to do the NCSG comment - thanks James!

I'll note that those willing to make a comment have the option of using a "fill in the blank" template in doing so.  I'm going to do so: I'm not sure I like the concept but I want to give it a shot before condemning it. :)

Thanks for considering,

Ed

Sent from my iPhone

Begin forwarded message:

> From: Grace Abuhamad <grace.abuhamad at icann.org>
> Date: June 22, 2015 at 8:54:36 AM GMT-3
> To: "egmorris1 at toast.net" <egmorris1 at toast.net>
> Subject: Public Comment on Reviews Schedule
> 
> Hi Edward, 
> 
> Thank you for your kind words yesterday. In a service-oriented organization, it?s always good to know that our stakeholders are satisfied with our work. 
> 
> I mentioned the open public comment on the Reviews. If you can pass this along and encourage some folks to submit to this public comment, this will be really helpful. It?s important because, most of all, the review schedule affects the volunteers? workload. I?ll let you make your own determination on this of course, but any feedback will be helpful to the public comment process. Also, there is a public session on Wednesday that will help introduce the public comment and answer some questions that you may already have. I?ve included the information for both below:  
> 
> Public session at ICANN53 AoC and Organizational Reviews: Supporting ICANN Accountability
> ?         Wed, 24 June 2015 - 10:30 to 12:00 ART; Room: Libertador AB
> ?         Session overview:  Reviews make an important contribution to supporting ICANN accountability. During this session, we will cover Reviews defined by the Affirmation of Commitments (AoC) and Organizational Reviews, mandated by ICANN's Bylaws. Topics will include: proposed schedule for upcoming reviews, proposed process and operational improvements to enhance efficiency and effectiveness of reviews, implementation status of recommendations from the Second Accountability and Transparency Review Team (ATRT2), the Security, Stability & Resiliency of the DNS Review (SSR) and the "WHOIS Policy" Review (WHOIS).
>  
> Public Comment pertaining to Proposed Schedule and Process/Operational Improvements for AoC and Organizational Reviews.
> ?         Public comments period closes 2 July.
> ?         The purpose of this Public Comment posting:  to request community feedback on a proposed schedule and process, including operational improvements, for Reviews mandated by the Affirmation of Commitments (AoC Reviews) and the ICANN Bylaws (Organizational Reviews). The request for the community is based on both appreciating the community's workload and the timing of several Reviews in FY2016.
>  
> 
> Thank you, 
> Grace
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20150622/454d14a7/attachment-0001.html>