[PC-NCSG] NCPH joint Letter about GNSO review

[Amr Elsadr]

Hi,

There's a deadline coming up on this, and we've only heard from a handful of PC members. Could others weigh in with opinions on whether we should sign this statement along with the CSG?

Thanks. 

Amr

Sent from mobile

> On Jul 28, 2015, at 2:15 AM, Sam Lanfranco <lanfran at yorku.ca> wrote:
> 
> I am traveling in the Canadian North (read: no Internet; no cell coverage) and in a village with Internet at the moment, so this will be short. I am told that the deadline for responses has been extended slightly and I would expect that the NPOC submission will be modified and expanded slightly compared to to comments submitted just prior to the previous deadline. There is no disagreement around the inadequate survey methods used to produce the report. There are a variety of opinions with regard to how best to respond to that issue and with regard to the best sequence of next steps.
> 
> With regard to the future of GNSO, we are not in a position to have a menu of choices and decide which are selected and which are to be ignored. We are more like a cook with a list of ingredients trying to figure out what should be cooked, how it should be cooked, and who is it for.
> 
> My personal view is that the Westlake report should not be allowed to used to make change decisions, but that the occasion of the Westlake report can be used to highlight issues that need be addressed, be they in the report or not.
> 
> Sam
> 
>> On 2015-07-27 5:01 PM, Amr Elsadr wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Apologies regarding the delay in providing a draft NCSG response to the Westlake report. I am trying to get that done as soon as I can, but am also a bit preoccupied with selling all my furniture, packing up three years worth of junk to move back to Egypt (leaving Troms? in under a week).
>> 
>> Again?, am really sorry about being so late with this.
>> 
>> Thanks.
>> 
>> Amr
>