[PC-NCSG] NCPH joint Letter about GNSO review

[Sam Lanfranco]

I am traveling in the Canadian North (read: no Internet; no cell 
coverage) and in a village with Internet at the moment, so this will be 
short. I am told that the deadline for responses has been extended 
slightly and I would expect that the NPOC submission will be modified 
and expanded slightly compared to to comments submitted just prior to 
the previous deadline. There is no disagreement around the inadequate 
survey methods used to produce the report. There are a variety of 
opinions with regard to how best to respond to that issue and with 
regard to the best sequence of next steps.

With regard to the future of GNSO, we are not in a position to have a 
menu of choices and decide which are selected and which are to be 
ignored. We are more like a cook with a list of ingredients trying to 
figure out what should be cooked, how it should be cooked, and who is it 
for.

My personal view is that the Westlake report should not be allowed to 
used to make change decisions, but that the occasion of the Westlake 
report can be used to highlight issues that need be addressed, be they 
in the report or not.

Sam

On 2015-07-27 5:01 PM, Amr Elsadr wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Apologies regarding the delay in providing a draft NCSG response to the Westlake report. I am trying to get that done as soon as I can, but am also a bit preoccupied with selling all my furniture, packing up three years worth of junk to move back to Egypt (leaving Troms? in under a week).
>
> Again?, am really sorry about being so late with this.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Amr
>