[PC-NCSG] Draft comments to the AoC/Organisational review schedule public comment

[Avri Doria]

Hi,

As long as it continues to:

a. have the atrt3 priority
b. the importance of any changes to AOC reviews being approved by NTIA

i will endorse.

is this one due tomorrow? 2-July?

avri


On 01-Jul-15 18:26, Amr Elsadr wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> I?ve reordered the three operational reviews in the draft to be:
>
> 1. CCT2 ?> 2. SSR2 ?> 3. WHOIS2
>
> I?ve also added a paragraph with the rationale on why the WHOIS2 review should not begin this year. I apologise for making this change so late, but had expressed this view both here and on NCSG-DISCUSS recently.
>
> As is, I?m ready to endorse this comment as an NCSG submission.
>
> If you haven?t looked at this yet, please do. The draft comment is available here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LLCWNYombphjN5Pxob4IVEXNMjyuNim8YPUNCQVdx3g/edit?pli=1#
>
> The public comment period details are here: https://www.icann.org/public-comments/proposed-aoc-org-reviews-process-2015-05-15-en
>
> We only have another 24 hours to submit this comment, so would be great to hear from as many PC members as possible.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Amr
>
> On Jul 1, 2015, at 7:45 PM, Edward Morris <egmorris1 at toast.net> wrote:
>
>> My views are a bit different than those in the document: basically halt organizational reviews until the ACCT bylaws changes are done but proceed with the ATRT reviews, albeit possibly on a more relaxed schedule. If the organizational reviews are to go forward I would prioritize the at large review given the relative importance of the group to proposed reforms.
>>
>> That said, I have no strong objection to the document as is and there is a lot of good stuff in it. Happy for it to go forward if others support it.
>>
>> Ed
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>> On Jul 1, 2015, at 9:05 AM, Amr Elsadr <aelsadr at egyptig.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Thanks for the reminder, Rafik. Now would be a good time to start getting comments/endorsements for this. We will need to submit it before July 2nd, UTC 23:59.
>>>
>>> I am generally supportive of the document, but have some concerns. The main one is recommending another WHOIS review at this time when the post-EWG PDP will be starting. It doesn?t make much sense to me to perform a WHOIS review when the WHOIS may change significantly. Also not sure how many volunteers would want to focus on working with a WHOIS review team while the post-EWG PDP is going on.
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> Amr
>>>
>>>> On Jul 1, 2015, at 1:59 PM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> this is a reminder about the comment to be submitted by NCSG.
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>>
>>>> Rafik
>>>>
>>>> 2015-06-29 13:43 GMT+09:00 Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>:
>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>
>>>> we got this comment initiated by James https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LLCWNYombphjN5Pxob4IVEXNMjyuNim8YPUNCQVdx3g/edit?usp=sharing and which received some edits. please review it so NCSG PC can endorse it . the deadline is 2nd July 23:59.
>>>>
>>>> so please review, comments and help with edits.
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>>
>>>> Rafik
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>>>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>
>


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus