[PC-NCSG] Draft comments to the AoC/Organisational review schedule public comment

[Amr Elsadr]

Hi again,

I?ve reordered the three operational reviews in the draft to be:

1. CCT2 ?> 2. SSR2 ?> 3. WHOIS2

I?ve also added a paragraph with the rationale on why the WHOIS2 review should not begin this year. I apologise for making this change so late, but had expressed this view both here and on NCSG-DISCUSS recently.

As is, I?m ready to endorse this comment as an NCSG submission.

If you haven?t looked at this yet, please do. The draft comment is available here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LLCWNYombphjN5Pxob4IVEXNMjyuNim8YPUNCQVdx3g/edit?pli=1#

The public comment period details are here: https://www.icann.org/public-comments/proposed-aoc-org-reviews-process-2015-05-15-en

We only have another 24 hours to submit this comment, so would be great to hear from as many PC members as possible.

Thanks.

Amr

On Jul 1, 2015, at 7:45 PM, Edward Morris <egmorris1 at toast.net> wrote:

> My views are a bit different than those in the document: basically halt organizational reviews until the ACCT bylaws changes are done but proceed with the ATRT reviews, albeit possibly on a more relaxed schedule. If the organizational reviews are to go forward I would prioritize the at large review given the relative importance of the group to proposed reforms.
> 
> That said, I have no strong objection to the document as is and there is a lot of good stuff in it. Happy for it to go forward if others support it.
> 
> Ed
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On Jul 1, 2015, at 9:05 AM, Amr Elsadr <aelsadr at egyptig.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Thanks for the reminder, Rafik. Now would be a good time to start getting comments/endorsements for this. We will need to submit it before July 2nd, UTC 23:59.
>> 
>> I am generally supportive of the document, but have some concerns. The main one is recommending another WHOIS review at this time when the post-EWG PDP will be starting. It doesn?t make much sense to me to perform a WHOIS review when the WHOIS may change significantly. Also not sure how many volunteers would want to focus on working with a WHOIS review team while the post-EWG PDP is going on.
>> 
>> Thanks.
>> 
>> Amr
>> 
>>> On Jul 1, 2015, at 1:59 PM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> this is a reminder about the comment to be submitted by NCSG.
>>> 
>>> Best,
>>> 
>>> Rafik
>>> 
>>> 2015-06-29 13:43 GMT+09:00 Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>:
>>> Hi everyone,
>>> 
>>> we got this comment initiated by James https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LLCWNYombphjN5Pxob4IVEXNMjyuNim8YPUNCQVdx3g/edit?usp=sharing and which received some edits. please review it so NCSG PC can endorse it . the deadline is 2nd July 23:59.
>>> 
>>> so please review, comments and help with edits.
>>> 
>>> Best,
>>> 
>>> Rafik
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg