[PC-NCSG] NCSG-PC Work for 2015

Mon Jan 26 03:36:18 EET 2015

Hi Robin,

you mean during the NCSG CD meeting?

Rafik

2015-01-26 9:51 GMT+09:00 Robin Gross <robin at ipjustice.org>:

> Thanks, Rafik.  Of course I'll be glad to update on accountability.  Can
> we find any time in the agenda to discuss the GAC proposal on "geographic
> names"?  There will be a dedicated session on the topic in Singapore.
>
> Thanks,
> Robin
>
>
> On Jan 25, 2015, at 4:12 PM, Rafik Dammak wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> as proposals for topics we get and:
> - Accountability update (presented by Robin?, Avri?)
> - PDP overview: introduction to PDP , for newcomers (presented by Avri?)
> - PPSAI update (presented by Stephanie?)?
>
> Best,
>
> Rafik
>
> 2015-01-26 1:42 GMT+09:00 Amr Elsadr <aelsadr at egyptig.org>:
>
>> @Stephanie: +1
>>
>> This is a very important PDP, and one I believe a great deal of those
>> interested in whois should be updated on. The initial report on this PDP
>> will be coming soon, so maybe after it is published?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Amr
>>
>> Sent from mobile
>>
>> On Jan 25, 2015, at 3:40 PM, Stephanie Perrin <
>> stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca> wrote:
>>
>> I recommend we do a full debrief on all the issues behind the PPSAI
>> report.  Despite the fact that we have several members on that group, and
>> we have always had representation at the meetings, we will need full and
>> detailed comments on the draft report.
>> We would need that call sooner rather than later.
>> cheers SP
>> On 2015-01-22 13:23, Marilia Maciel wrote:
>>
>>  I agree with the topic specific calls as well. In our regular calls we
>> only have the chance to fly over the topics, not to go deeper. That would
>> be an opportunity.
>>
>>  Should we list 3-4 topics of relevance and try this for the next months
>> to see how it goes?
>>
>>  Mar?lia
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 11:50 AM, William Drake <wjdrake at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Topic calls would be great. Council-based calls are a necessity but
>>> unsurprisingly less of a pull to the average member.
>>>
>>>  Cheers
>>>
>>>  Bill
>>>
>>>
>>>  On Jan 20, 2015, at 1:51 AM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>  Hi Avri,
>>>
>>>  yes the idea to have a topic-call, we did one for IANA stewardship and
>>> was helpful for our comment to the CCWg proposal. I think we can an
>>> accountability call after frankfurt meeting and just before singapore
>>>
>>>  Rafik
>>>
>>> 2015-01-20 9:17 GMT+09:00 Avri Doria <avri at acm.org>:
>>>
>>>>  Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Amr, glad to see you on the job.
>>>>
>>>> I would also like to suggest that we schedule at least one monthly call
>>>> for the membership on one or another of the massive policy efforts that are
>>>> going on.  Rafik and I talked about doing this but never got very far.  I
>>>> think we did 1.
>>>>
>>>> avri
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 19-Jan-15 15:58, Rafik Dammak wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Amr,
>>>>
>>>>  thanks for these proposal,
>>>> regarding PC meeting in Singapore, I may suggest 1 hour for the motions
>>>> (if there are some substantive) and having 1 hour for strategy/planning for
>>>> this year
>>>>
>>>>  Rafik
>>>>
>>>> 2015-01-19 23:47 GMT+09:00 Amr Elsadr <aelsadr at egyptig.org>:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>>  I know I?ve had a really late start to kicking my new duties off for
>>>>> the PC this year. This must have been a disappointment and a pain to most
>>>>> of you. Been busy these past couple of weeks, but promise to do everything
>>>>> I can to make up for it over the course of this year.
>>>>>
>>>>>  I wanted to start off by sharing some thoughts with you on how I see
>>>>> what I need to do to make the PC perform its function more efficiently, and
>>>>> would be grateful for feedback from all of you. These are my ideas on what
>>>>> I should do, but I some tasks may have slipped my mind:
>>>>>
>>>>>  1. Keeping a close eye on open public comment periods; with
>>>>> announcements (+ reminders) to the PC list to determine which issues are
>>>>> important to our membership, and identifying who would take the lead on
>>>>> each open issue. There are obviously some open issues on the table right
>>>>> now, especially in the aftermath of the NCPH intercessional in DC, that I
>>>>> will try to address in separate emails.
>>>>>
>>>>>  2. Sync that with a schedule on getting comments drafted and
>>>>> approved by the committee. I don?t see a reason to change the current
>>>>> consensus building approach we now use. Silence = consent, unless there are
>>>>> thoughts to the contrary.
>>>>>
>>>>>  3. Following up with NCSG members in various GNSO WGs/CWGs. This is
>>>>> important from a PC perspective to prep comments when asked similar to
>>>>> public comment periods. This does not mean I personally plan to update the
>>>>> NCSG wiki space on ongoing PDPs, but at least make sure there is some
>>>>> initiative for NCSG to submit comments when comments are asked for by the
>>>>> different working groups.
>>>>>
>>>>>  4. Asking councillors to take lead on prepping short briefs of
>>>>> motions before council to be delivered to the general membership prior to
>>>>> every monthly NCSG policy call. I know this is more council work than it is
>>>>> PC stuff, but all the councillors are on the PC. Apart from raising
>>>>> awareness on various GNSO policy recommendations amongst the NCSG
>>>>> membership, I?m hoping this will also help inform councillors who are not
>>>>> as up to speed on all of the motions on the meetings? agendas.
>>>>>
>>>>>  5. I will obviously need to help set agendas for the PC meetings
>>>>> that take place at the ICANN public meetings; the first being next month in
>>>>> Singapore.
>>>>>
>>>>>  6. I would like at least one alternate chair to pick up the slack
>>>>> when/if necessary.
>>>>>
>>>>>  Those are what I?ve come up with. Feedback from all of you would be
>>>>> highly appreciated.
>>>>>
>>>>>  Thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>>  Amr
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>>>>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>>>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> PC-NCSG mailing listPC-NCSG at ipjustice.orghttp://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>>>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>>
>>>>
>>>  _______________________________________________
>>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>  *Mar?lia Maciel*
>> Pesquisadora Gestora - Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade - FGV Direito Rio
>> Researcher and Coordinator - Center for Technology & Society - FGV Law
>> School
>> http://direitorio.fgv.br/cts
>>
>>  DiploFoundation associate - www.diplomacy.edu
>> PoliTICs Magazine Advisory Committee - http://www.politics.org.br/
>>  Subscribe "Digital Rights: Latin America & the Caribbean" -
>> http://www.digitalrightslac.net/en
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PC-NCSG mailing listPC-NCSG at ipjustice.orghttp://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20150126/176a6b06/attachment-0001.html>