[PC-NCSG] NCSG-PC Work for 2015
Robin Gross
robin
Mon Jan 26 02:51:35 EET 2015
Thanks, Rafik. Of course I'll be glad to update on accountability. Can we find any time in the agenda to discuss the GAC proposal on "geographic names"? There will be a dedicated session on the topic in Singapore.
Thanks,
Robin
On Jan 25, 2015, at 4:12 PM, Rafik Dammak wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as proposals for topics we get and:
> - Accountability update (presented by Robin?, Avri?)
> - PDP overview: introduction to PDP , for newcomers (presented by Avri?)
> - PPSAI update (presented by Stephanie?)?
>
> Best,
>
> Rafik
>
> 2015-01-26 1:42 GMT+09:00 Amr Elsadr <aelsadr at egyptig.org>:
> @Stephanie: +1
>
> This is a very important PDP, and one I believe a great deal of those interested in whois should be updated on. The initial report on this PDP will be coming soon, so maybe after it is published?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Amr
>
> Sent from mobile
>
> On Jan 25, 2015, at 3:40 PM, Stephanie Perrin <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca> wrote:
>
>> I recommend we do a full debrief on all the issues behind the PPSAI report. Despite the fact that we have several members on that group, and we have always had representation at the meetings, we will need full and detailed comments on the draft report.
>> We would need that call sooner rather than later.
>> cheers SP
>> On 2015-01-22 13:23, Marilia Maciel wrote:
>>> I agree with the topic specific calls as well. In our regular calls we only have the chance to fly over the topics, not to go deeper. That would be an opportunity.
>>>
>>> Should we list 3-4 topics of relevance and try this for the next months to see how it goes?
>>>
>>> Mar?lia
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 11:50 AM, William Drake <wjdrake at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Topic calls would be great. Council-based calls are a necessity but unsurprisingly less of a pull to the average member.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>> Bill
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Jan 20, 2015, at 1:51 AM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Avri,
>>>>
>>>> yes the idea to have a topic-call, we did one for IANA stewardship and was helpful for our comment to the CCWg proposal. I think we can an accountability call after frankfurt meeting and just before singapore
>>>>
>>>> Rafik
>>>>
>>>> 2015-01-20 9:17 GMT+09:00 Avri Doria <avri at acm.org>:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Amr, glad to see you on the job.
>>>>
>>>> I would also like to suggest that we schedule at least one monthly call for the membership on one or another of the massive policy efforts that are going on. Rafik and I talked about doing this but never got very far. I think we did 1.
>>>>
>>>> avri
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 19-Jan-15 15:58, Rafik Dammak wrote:
>>>>> Hi Amr,
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks for these proposal,
>>>>> regarding PC meeting in Singapore, I may suggest 1 hour for the motions (if there are some substantive) and having 1 hour for strategy/planning for this year
>>>>>
>>>>> Rafik
>>>>>
>>>>> 2015-01-19 23:47 GMT+09:00 Amr Elsadr <aelsadr at egyptig.org>:
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> I know I?ve had a really late start to kicking my new duties off for the PC this year. This must have been a disappointment and a pain to most of you. Been busy these past couple of weeks, but promise to do everything I can to make up for it over the course of this year.
>>>>>
>>>>> I wanted to start off by sharing some thoughts with you on how I see what I need to do to make the PC perform its function more efficiently, and would be grateful for feedback from all of you. These are my ideas on what I should do, but I some tasks may have slipped my mind:
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. Keeping a close eye on open public comment periods; with announcements (+ reminders) to the PC list to determine which issues are important to our membership, and identifying who would take the lead on each open issue. There are obviously some open issues on the table right now, especially in the aftermath of the NCPH intercessional in DC, that I will try to address in separate emails.
>>>>>
>>>>> 2. Sync that with a schedule on getting comments drafted and approved by the committee. I don?t see a reason to change the current consensus building approach we now use. Silence = consent, unless there are thoughts to the contrary.
>>>>>
>>>>> 3. Following up with NCSG members in various GNSO WGs/CWGs. This is important from a PC perspective to prep comments when asked similar to public comment periods. This does not mean I personally plan to update the NCSG wiki space on ongoing PDPs, but at least make sure there is some initiative for NCSG to submit comments when comments are asked for by the different working groups.
>>>>>
>>>>> 4. Asking councillors to take lead on prepping short briefs of motions before council to be delivered to the general membership prior to every monthly NCSG policy call. I know this is more council work than it is PC stuff, but all the councillors are on the PC. Apart from raising awareness on various GNSO policy recommendations amongst the NCSG membership, I?m hoping this will also help inform councillors who are not as up to speed on all of the motions on the meetings? agendas.
>>>>>
>>>>> 5. I will obviously need to help set agendas for the PC meetings that take place at the ICANN public meetings; the first being next month in Singapore.
>>>>>
>>>>> 6. I would like at least one alternate chair to pick up the slack when/if necessary.
>>>>>
>>>>> Those are what I?ve come up with. Feedback from all of you would be highly appreciated.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>> Amr
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>>>>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>>>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>>>>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>>>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>>>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>>>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Mar?lia Maciel
>>> Pesquisadora Gestora - Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade - FGV Direito Rio
>>> Researcher and Coordinator - Center for Technology & Society - FGV Law School
>>> http://direitorio.fgv.br/cts
>>>
>>> DiploFoundation associate - www.diplomacy.edu
>>> PoliTICs Magazine Advisory Committee - http://www.politics.org.br/
>>> Subscribe "Digital Rights: Latin America & the Caribbean" - http://www.digitalrightslac.net/en
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20150125/3cfd57c8/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 496 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20150125/3cfd57c8/attachment-0001.sig>
More information about the NCSG-PC
mailing list