[PC-NCSG] [NCSG-Discuss] My answers to the CWG-IANA questions

[Matthew Shears]

I am comfortable with Milton's answers as supported by numerous +1s.  Of 
course there are some dissenting views.  Not sure what the mechanisms 
are for taking this forward.

Matthew

On 2/24/2015 12:09 AM, Avri Doria wrote:
> hi,
>
> So how we get a coherent set of answers at this point is beyond me.
>
> Perhaps I am too close at the moment.
>
> Somehow we need to come up with a single answer, not sure there is 
> much value in sending in a mixed view.  I do not see a single view at 
> this point.  But perhaps others can see one.
>
> Chair how do you want to handle this?
>
> avri
>
>
> On 24-Feb-15 07:51, Avri Doria wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> As I had indicated earlier, I had been collecting responses in a 
>> Drive doc:
>>
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1U72dVBIuwU3eq8K1e3DWstXNZLOCpcB4YFvKmqHCHQ0/edit?usp=sharing
>>
>> No one has  commented there in a few days, though we have seen some 
>> +1s on the list for Milton's position
>>
>> I am copying the NCSG Policy Committee on this asking what they want 
>> to do.  A few of people have stood up for Milton's responses perhaps 
>> with a few quibbles, and he did already offer them as the NCSG 
>> positon in the live session.  On the other hand a few people have 
>> indicated some disagreement with his responses.
>>
>> While it is late, responses could still be submitted.
>>
>> avri
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20150224/1c306967/attachment.html>