[PC-NCSG] [NCSG-Discuss] My answers to the CWG-IANA questions

Avri Doria avri
Tue Feb 24 02:09:24 EET 2015


hi,

So how we get a coherent set of answers at this point is beyond me.

Perhaps I am too close at the moment.

Somehow we need to come up with a single answer, not sure there is much
value in sending in a mixed view.  I do not see a single view at this
point.  But perhaps others can see one. 

Chair how do you want to handle this?

avri


On 24-Feb-15 07:51, Avri Doria wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As I had indicated earlier, I had been collecting responses in a Drive
> doc:
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1U72dVBIuwU3eq8K1e3DWstXNZLOCpcB4YFvKmqHCHQ0/edit?usp=sharing
>
> No one has  commented there in a few days, though we have seen some
> +1s on the list for Milton's position
>
> I am copying the NCSG Policy Committee on this asking what they want
> to do.  A few of people have stood up for Milton's responses perhaps
> with a few quibbles, and he did already offer them as the NCSG positon
> in the live session.  On the other hand a few people have indicated
> some disagreement with his responses. 
>
> While it is late, responses could still be submitted.
>
> avri
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20150224/91775de2/attachment.html>



More information about the NCSG-PC mailing list