[PC-NCSG] fw: [council] Final Issue Report on New gTLD Subsequent Procedures

[Rafik Dammak]

Hi ,

I do recall sending the annoucement, creating a google doc for a comment
and included the PC. Yes, we did not submit a statement but I would expect
the PC to be more proactive in term of developing positions, managing
consultation process, set priorities and share the workload. It is the
responsability of everyone here.

I would prefer to be more practical here and suggest that we list all open
comments and decide which has high priority, get volunteers for drafting
each  and someone to lead it. That should be a regular task.  Definitely,
the ccwg report is on the top of the pile.

Best,

Rafik
On Dec 5, 2015 9:56 AM, "Edward Morris" <egmorris1 at toast.net> wrote:

> Hi everybody,
>
> I'm forwarding this post from the Council list. We did not file a public
> comment here, some affiliated with our members did, but we certainly need
> to be active on any PDP that comes out of this as well as developing some
> common positions that we should be pushing.
>
> Ed
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From*: "Steve Chan" <steve.chan at icann.org>
> *Sent*: Friday, December 4, 2015 11:20 PM
> *To*: "council at gnso.icann.org" <council at gnso.icann.org>
> *Subject*: [council] Final Issue Report on New gTLD Subsequent Procedures
>
> Dear Councilors,
>
> Please find attached for your consideration the Final Issue Report on New
> gTLD Subsequent Procedures, which is also available here:
> http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/new-gtlds/subsequent-procedures-final-issue-04dec15-en.pdf.
> You may recall that the Council requested an Issue Report on the topic at
> the Buenos Aires meeting in June 2015. Under the ICANN Bylaws, an Issue
> Report is a mandatory preceding step to a possible PDP that is initiated by
> the GNSO Council. The Preliminary Issue Report was published for public
> comment on 31 August 2015, with the forum closing on 30 October 2015. The
> Report of Public Comments received is expected to be published on 4
> December 2015 and made available here:
> https://www.icann.org/public-comments/new-gtld-subsequent-prelim-2015-08-31-en
> .
>
> In preparing this Final Issue Report, all the public comments received
> were analyzed and, where relevant, incorporated into the Final Issue
> Report. The Report of Public Comments has also been added as a separate
> Annex.
>
> The staff recommendation is that the Council initiate a PDP to consider
> and analyze issues discussed in the Final Issue Report on New gTLD
> Subsequent Procedures to determine whether changes or adjustments to the
> existing policy recommendations in the Final Report on the Introduction of
> New Generic Top-Level Domains are needed.  The outcome of the PDP may lead
> to (i) amending or overriding existing policy principles, recommendations,
> and implementation guidelines; (ii) developing new policy recommendations,
> and/or (iii) supplementing or developing new implementation guidance.
>
> The relevant motions are currently in preparation for proposal by a GNSO
> Councilor.
>
> If you have any questions or concerns, please let me know.
>
> Best,
>
>
>
>
> *Steven Chan*
> Sr. Policy Manager
>
> *ICANN*
> 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300
>
> Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536
> steve.chan at icann.org
>
> direct: +1.310.301.3886
> mobile: +1.310.339.4410
>
> tel: +1.310.301.5800
>
> fax: +1.310.823.8649
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20151205/26065355/attachment.html>