[PC-NCSG] fw: [council] Final Issue Report on New gTLD Subsequent Procedures

[Stephanie Perrin]

yes we had better discuss those common positions on our next call, as I 
am afraid that I for one forget them....
cheers Stephanie
PS and I do hope that I am not the only one prepared to admit data 
overload....

On 2015-12-04 19:56, Edward Morris wrote:
> Hi everybody,
> I'm forwarding this post from the Council list. We did not file a 
> public comment here, some affiliated with our members did, but we 
> certainly need to be active on any PDP that comes out of this as well 
> as developing some common positions that we should be pushing.
> Ed
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From*: "Steve Chan" <steve.chan at icann.org>
> *Sent*: Friday, December 4, 2015 11:20 PM
> *To*: "council at gnso.icann.org" <council at gnso.icann.org>
> *Subject*: [council] Final Issue Report on New gTLD Subsequent Procedures
> Dear Councilors,
> Please find attached for your consideration the Final Issue Report on 
> New gTLD Subsequent Procedures, which is also available here: 
> http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/new-gtlds/subsequent-procedures-final-issue-04dec15-en.pdf. 
> You may recall that the Council requested an Issue Report on the topic 
> at the Buenos Aires meeting in June 2015. Under the ICANN Bylaws, an 
> Issue Report is a mandatory preceding step to a possible PDP that is 
> initiated by the GNSO Council. The Preliminary Issue Report was 
> published for public comment on 31 August 2015, with the forum closing 
> on 30 October 2015. The Report of Public Comments received is expected 
> to be published on 4 December 2015 and made available here: 
> https://www.icann.org/public-comments/new-gtld-subsequent-prelim-2015-08-31-en. 
>
> In preparing this Final Issue Report, all the public comments received 
> were analyzed and, where relevant, incorporated into the Final Issue 
> Report. The Report of Public Comments has also been added as a 
> separate Annex.
> The staff recommendation is that the Council initiate a PDP to 
> consider and analyze issues discussed in the Final Issue Report on New 
> gTLD Subsequent Procedures to determine whether changes or adjustments 
> to the existing policy recommendations in the Final Report on the 
> Introduction of New Generic Top-Level Domains are needed.  The outcome 
> of the PDP may lead to (i) amending or overriding existing policy 
> principles, recommendations, and implementation guidelines; (ii) 
> developing new policy recommendations, and/or (iii) supplementing or 
> developing new implementation guidance.
> The relevant motions are currently in preparation for proposal by a 
> GNSO Councilor.
> If you have any questions or concerns, please let me know.
> Best,
>
> *Steven Chan*
> Sr. Policy Manager
>
> *ICANN*
> 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300
>
> Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536
> steve.chan at icann.org <mailto:steve.chan at icann.org>
>
> direct: +1.310.301.3886
> mobile: +1.310.339.4410
>
> tel: +1.310.301.5800
>
> fax: +1.310.823.8649
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20151204/805288f0/attachment-0001.html>