[PC-NCSG] [Gnso-ncph-leadership] NCPH v-chair election - just what we all have time for

[Sam Lanfranco]

I can support the approach as now outlined, with the amendment proposed 
by CSG.

Sam

On 06/08/2015 8:08 AM, Amr Elsadr wrote:
> Me too. Thanks. Amr
>> On Aug 6, 2015, at 11:03 AM, Matthew Shears <mshears at cdt.org> wrote: 
>> I'm OK with this formulation - thanks. On 8/6/2015 10:00 AM, David 
>> Cake wrote:
>>> I?m certainly OK with it. The interview process was a sensible idea, 
>>> I thought. Only one caveat I?d suggest - IF there is an NCPH 
>>> candidate for chair, chair and vice-chair should be considered 
>>> together. David
>>>> On 6 Aug 2015, at 4:25 pm, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> 
>>>> wrote: Hi, thanks, so I can assume that we are ok with small 
>>>> amendment proposed by CSG? looking to hear from other so I can 
>>>> respond to Steve. Rafik 2015-07-26 6:10 GMT+09:00 Joy Liddicoat 
>>>> <joy at liddicoatlaw.co.nz>: Hi ? I also agree Joy From: PC-NCSG 
>>>> [mailto:pc-ncsg-bounces at ipjustice.org] On Behalf Of Marilia Maciel 
>>>> Sent: Friday, 24 July 2015 12:21 a.m. To: Rafik Dammak Cc: 
>>>> NCSG-Policy Subject: Re: [PC-NCSG] [Gnso-ncph-leadership] NCPH 
>>>> v-chair election - just what we all have time for Also agree. 
>>>> Mar?lia On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 7:48 AM, Rafik Dammak 
>>>> <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> wrote: Hi, it sounds a fair request, CSG 
>>>> conducted such interviews for candidates for previous elections. 
>>>> @everyone is there any objection or suggestion? we should respond 
>>>> soon , Best, Rafik 2015-07-19 22:55 GMT+09:00 Stephanie Perrin 
>>>> <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>: sounds reasonable to me...but 
>>>> I am perhaps not suffficiently exercise on this issue. cheers SP On 
>>>> 2015-07-19 9:21, Amr Elsadr wrote: Hi, Also fine by me. Perhaps 
>>>> also formalise the option to interview the candidate? If I recall 
>>>> correctly, they held a call with David prior to agreeing to him as 
>>>> a VC. This is only a suggestion. It may (or may not) come in handy 
>>>> at some point. Thanks. Amr On Jul 19, 2015, at 12:17 PM, William 
>>>> Drake <wjdrake at gmail.com> wrote: Fine by me. BD On Jul 19, 2015, at 
>>>> 10:37 AM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> wrote: Hi everyone, 
>>>> You will found below the comments from CSG to Avri counter-proposal 
>>>> regarding VC chair process. they will accept it and offering an 
>>>> amendment. can you please review so we can move forward with this 
>>>> issue. the VC chair election is coming soon. Best Regards, Rafik 
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Metalitz, Steven 
>>>> <met at msk.com> Date: 2015-07-14 7:54 GMT+09:00 Subject: RE: FW: 
>>>> [Gnso-ncph-leadership] NCPH v-chair election - just what we all 
>>>> have time for To: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> Hi Rafik, 
>>>> This was discussed by the CSG Executive Committee last week, and we 
>>>> are prepared to accept the counter-proposal with one change. We did 
>>>> not understand why the first round was structured as a ?vote 
>>>> against round, i.e., a voting procedure where everyone votes for 
>>>> the candidate they would like to see least in the role.? We think 
>>>> the same objective could be achieved by a conventional voting 
>>>> procedure, with the top two (or more in case of a tie) vote getters 
>>>> proceeding to the second round. With that change we are prepared to 
>>>> move toward setting a schedule for the vice chair election (i.e., a 
>>>> deadline for nominations, acceptances, and scheduling of the 
>>>> rounds). Please let me know if NCSG will accept this relatively 
>>>> minor change so we can move to the next step The CSG Executive 
>>>> Committee also wished to convey that while we are prepared to 
>>>> accept this approach for this year, our proposal form last January 
>>>> remains on the table in order to provide a permanent solution 
>>>> through rotation of nominations. Looking forward to your response. 
>>>> Steve Metalitz . From: Rafik Dammak [mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com] 
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2015 10:55 PM To: Metalitz, Steven Subject: 
>>>> Re: FW: [Gnso-ncph-leadership] NCPH v-chair election - just what we 
>>>> all have time for Hi Steve, thanks for the email, yes it can be 
>>>> considered as a counter-proposal to be discussed. definitely we 
>>>> have to solve before the coming soon VC election. Best, Rafik 
>>>> 2015-07-07 2:14 GMT+09:00 Metalitz, Steven <met at msk.com>: Hi Rafik, 
>>>> I hope this finds you well and fully recovered from travel to 
>>>> Buenos Aires. As you may recall, NCSG participants in in the 
>>>> January intersessional in Washington committed to providing a 
>>>> counter-proposal by the end of the Singapore meeting to the CSG 
>>>> proposal on election procedures going forward for the vice chair 
>>>> slot. The rest of the CSG leadership asked me to check with you on 
>>>> whether Avri?s text at the link below is in fact the 
>>>> counter-proposal from NCSG, and if not, when we could expect to 
>>>> receive one. Thanks! Steve Metalitz , for CSG Executive Committee 
>>>> From: gnso-ncph-leadership-bounces at icann.org 
>>>> [mailto:gnso-ncph-leadership-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Avri 
>>>> Doria Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2015 7:42 AM To: 
>>>> gnso-ncph-leadership at icann.org Subject: [Gnso-ncph-leadership] NCPH 
>>>> v-chair election - just what we all have time for Hi, Sometime in 
>>>> February, I created this first version of a simple procedure for 
>>>> NCPH election of a v-chair. I gave this to Rafik and David. David 
>>>> was unhappy with it, and then I got distracted and further work 
>>>> just stalled. So here we are, one meeting away from needing to 
>>>> elect a new v-chair. While knowing that no one but me thinks this 
>>>> is a possible way to go, here it is to beat on. 
>>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zpkznZGutvze0hI4BLePoaZWoqLWhioq-tjwVKCiyqs/edit?usp=sharing> 
>>>> The doc is open for comments and suggested changes by anyone with 
>>>> the URL. At the moment Rakif, David and I am the only editors, but 
>>>> more than happy to add SG/C others, all you need to do is let me 
>>>> know what email/login you use for editing drive docs. The editors 
>>>> would be the ones to accept the changes - I don't want to presume 
>>>> to do so - except of course for typos, which I will gladly accept. 
>>>> Note, however, you do not need to have edit priviledge to suggest 
>>>> changes, and I recommend that even those with editor priviledge use 
>>>> suggest mode to suggest changes. avri

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20150806/56955527/attachment.html>