[PC-NCSG] Consensus check on Re: [] [] NCSG position regarding by-laws change for GAC advice

[Amr Elsadr]

Hi,

On Sep 22, 2014, at 4:04 PM, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> If we add another paragrapgh we do go back to zero and need to reread
> and give a new measure of agreement.

Yeah?, I would think so. Although it isn?t a completely new point, but rather repurposing the bit we took out regarding what we were calling authoritative regimes to make it more relevant to the context of the announcement. Robin, I thought, made her point very nicely in a comment on the text in the google doc.

> as for our PC chair, we have 2.  A Primary and an alternate, either of
> whom can ask as chair.  Are both too busy for this committee?  if so,
> perhaps we need a new solution.

It?d be nice to hear from them; what their thoughts are.

Thanks.

Amr