[PC-NCSG] Fwd: Fwd: Call for Volunteers for Implementation Advisory Group to Review Existing ICANN Procedure for Handling WHOIS Conflicts with Privacy Laws
Stephanie Perrin
stephanie.perrin
Wed Oct 15 10:12:03 EEST 2014
why is this coming out prior to the decision re EWG PDPs??? just
asking....and yes, I have to volunteer...
Stephanie
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Fwd: Call for Volunteers for Implementation Advisory Group to
Review Existing ICANN Procedure for Handling WHOIS Conflicts with
Privacy Laws
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 19:20:41 -0500
From: Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels at gmail.com>
To: Stephanie Perrin <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>,
"Michael.Niebel at ec.europa.eu" <Michael.Niebel at ec.europa.eu>, Michele
Neylon <michele at blacknight.ie>
Maybe we should volunteer as a group?
CAS
==============================
Carlton A Samuels
Mobile: 876-818-1799
/Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround/
=============================
ICANN <http://www.icann.org/>
News Alert
https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-10-14-en
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Call for Volunteers for Implementation Advisory Group to Review
Existing ICANN Procedure for Handling WHOIS Conflicts with Privacy Laws
14 October 2014
In Brief
ICANN seeks volunteers to serve on an Implementation Advisory Group
(IAG) to review and suggest potential changes to the implementation of
the ICANN Procedure for Handling WHOIS Conflicts with Privacy Laws
<https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/whois-privacy-conflicts-procedure-2008-01-17-en>
(the Procedure.)
What This Team Will Do
The IAG will work with ICANN staff on reviewing the current steps of the
Procedure and identifying possible changes to the procedure to
facilitate resolution of issues where WHOIS requirements conflict with
applicable laws. The IAG is expected to explore whether any of the
Procedure's elements ought to be amended in order to strike this
balance. Any recommended changes made will need to be in line with the
Procedure's underlying policy, which was adopted by the GNSO Council in
2005
<http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/whois-privacy/council-rpt-18jan06.htm>.
As a result, recommended changes to the implementation of the procedure,
if any, will be shared with the GNSO Council to ensure that these do not
conflict with the intent of the original policy recommendations.
How This Team Will Work
Like other ICANN working groups, the Implementation Advisory Group will
use transparent, open processes. The meetings of the IAG are expected to
take place via conference calls which will be recorded, and the
recordings will be available to the public. Initially, it is expected
the group will meet once every two weeks, but the IAG will then
determine its preferred schedule and methodology. The mailing list for
the IAG will be archived publicly. Observers are welcome to join the
mailing list to monitor the discussions. These observers will receive
emails from the group, but will not be able to post messages or attend
meetings. IAG members are expected to submit Statements of Interest (SOI
<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/New+SOIs>). The group will
collaborate using a public workspace.
How To Join
ICANN invites interested parties to join the IAG, which will be open to
anyone interested to join. ICANN urges interested community members
willing to work on this initiative and with a range of views to join and
contribute to the group's work. As noted above, you can join the IAG
either as a member or an observer. Please contact
whois-iag-volunteers at icann.org <mailto:whois-iag-volunteers at icann.org>
if you wish to join the IAG.
Background
In November 2005, the Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO)
concluded a policy development process (PDP) on WHOIS conflicts with
privacy law which recommended
<http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/whois-privacy/council-rpt-18jan06.htm>
that "In order to facilitate reconciliation of any conflicts between
local/national mandatory privacy laws or regulations and applicable
provisions of the ICANN contract regarding the collection, display and
distribution of personal data via the gTLD WHOIS service, ICANN should:
1. Develop and publicly document a procedure for dealing with the
situation in which a registrar or registry can credibly demonstrate
that it is legally prevented by local/national privacy laws or
regulations from fully complying with applicable provisions of its
ICANN contract regarding the collection, display and distribution of
personal data via WHOIS.
2. Create goals for the procedure which include:
1. Ensuring that ICANN staff is informed of a conflict at the
earliest appropriate juncture;
2. Resolving the conflict, if possible, in a manner conducive to
ICANN's Mission, applicable Core Values, and the stability and
uniformity of the WHOIS system;
3. Providing a mechanism for the recognition, if appropriate, in
circumstances where the conflict cannot be otherwise resolved,
of an exception to contractual obligations to those
registries/registrars to which the specific conflict applies
with regard to collection, display and distribution of
personally identifiable data via WHOIS; and
4. Preserving sufficient flexibility for ICANN staff to respond to
particular factual situations as they arise".
The ICANN Board adopted the recommendations in May 2006 and the final
Procedure was made effective in January 2008. Although to date no
registrar or registry operator has formally invoked the Procedure,
concerns have been expressed both by public authorities as well as
registrars and registry operators concerning potential conflicts between
WHOIS contractual obligations and local law.
Given that the WHOIS Procedure has not been invoked and yet numerous
concerns have arisen from contracted parties and the wider community,
ICANN launched a review as part of the Procedure. The review was
launched with the publication of a paper for public comment on 22 May
2014
<https://www.icann.org/public-comments/whois-conflicts-procedure-2014-05-22-en>.
The paper outlined the Procedure's steps and invited public comments on
a series of questions. The body of public comment was analyzed by ICANN
staff, and the proposed next step is the formation of an IAG to consider
changes to how the Procedure is enacted and used. ICANN staff found
common themes among some of the suggestions in the public comments,
which may allow for changes to implementation of the Procedure in line
with the underlying policy.
On 22 September 2014, the GAC noted
<https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/dryden-to-crocker-23sep14-en.pdf>
[PDF, 55 KB] that the issues around the WHOIS Conflicts with National
Law Procedure warrant further time and attention, as they touch on
significant public policy matters associated with national laws and the
legitimate uses of WHOIS data. The IAG is open to participation and GAC
members and other government stakeholders are encouraged to take part in
the group to contribute to advancement of the work in this area.
The IAG's recommendation will then be shared with the GNSO Council to
determine the next steps.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20141015/6839696a/attachment.html>
More information about the NCSG-PC
mailing list