[PC-NCSG] NCSG position regarding by-laws change for GAC advice

Rafik Dammak rafik.dammak
Mon Oct 6 09:53:57 EEST 2014 

Hi Rudi, Maria,

can we consider the statement endorsed? the deadline to send the comment is
today.

Rafik

2014-10-05 21:10 GMT+09:00 Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>:

> Hi Amr,
>
> yes I think the deadline for consensus is already passed.
>
> Rafik
>
> 2014-10-05 21:10 GMT+09:00 Amr Elsadr <aelsadr at egyptig.org>:
>
>> Hi again,
>>
>> May we now consider this consensus period closed? I note Avri?s
>> abstention, but there were no objections unless I missed them. The last
>> draft is attached to this email.
>>
>> I?m not sure if the PC has also decided to endorse the other comments
>> that were suggested, or not.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Amr
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Oct 2, 2014, at 6:43 PM, Stephanie Perrin <
>> stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca> wrote:
>>
>>  I support it.
>> Stephanie Perrin
>> On 2014-10-02, 5:57, Rudi Vansnick wrote:
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>>  Based on the request received by Amr Elsadr (see below), I?m calling
>> for a consensus vote on the NCSG position regarding by-laws change for GAC
>> advice. The comment can be found here:
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ISi_1cIaG3Hl4hzCM2VVc8sBsqGJQw6WR3vr6tptUcI/edit
>>
>>  This e-vote consensus call will last till Saturday 4 October 23:59 UTC.
>> Thus allowing us to provide NCSG comments before the deadline (6th October).
>> May I request prompt action please ?
>>
>>  Kind regards,
>>
>>   Rudi Vansnick
>> Alternate chair PC-NCSG
>>
>>
>>
>> Begin doorgestuurd bericht:
>>
>>  *Van: *Amr Elsadr <aelsadr at egyptig.org>
>>  *Onderwerp: **Antw.: [PC-NCSG] [NCSG-Discuss] [Contribution] Working on
>> NCSG position regarding by-laws change for GAC advice*
>>  *Datum: *1 oktober 2014 17:25:57 CEST
>>  *Aan: *NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU, NCSG Policy Committee <
>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>>
>>  Hi,
>>
>>  I?m reopening this thread because there have been a significant number
>> of changes to the comment I would like to submit on behalf of the NCSG for
>> the reply period on the by-laws change regarding the ICANN board?s
>> rejection of GAC Advice.
>>
>>  The comment can be found here:
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ISi_1cIaG3Hl4hzCM2VVc8sBsqGJQw6WR3vr6tptUcI/edit
>>
>>  There has been some discussion regarding what to keep in the comment,
>> and what to take out on the NCSG Policy Committee list. This is the last
>> bit I?ve come up with. If you do read it, please note that I also plan on
>> taking the second sentence out of the first paragraph, unless I hear
>> objections against doing so. At this point, I?d like to know if there are
>> any objections to submitting the comment in its current form. I ask this to
>> both the NCSG PC members, as well as the full NCSG membership.
>>
>>  Finally, I would also appreciate it if the NCSG (in its response)
>> endorses the comments submitted by the NCSG members:
>>
>>  1. Milton Mueller
>> 2. Robin Gross
>> 3. Edward Morris
>> 4. Avri Doria
>> 5. Wisdom Kwasi
>> 6. Amr Elsadr (me)
>>
>>  as well as two other comments submitted by:
>>
>>  1. Tucows (
>> http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-bylaws-amend-gac-advice-15aug14/msg00038.html)
>> and
>> 2. The Internet Infrastructure Coalition (
>> http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-bylaws-amend-gac-advice-15aug14/msg00032.html
>> )
>>
>>  The deadline for submission is on October 6th, so I would appreciate it
>> if the NCSG PC also set a deadline for a consensus call.
>>
>>  Thanks everyone.
>>
>>  Amr
>>
>>  On Sep 15, 2014, at 9:20 PM, Amr Elsadr <aelsadr at egyptig.org> wrote:
>>
>>  Great catch, Carlos. Slipped my mind. Thanks for that.
>>
>>  Amr
>>
>>  On Sep 15, 2014, at 7:36 PM, Carlos Ra?l Guti?rrez <
>> carlosraulg at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>  Only one additional comment: there is already a direct liaison between
>> GNSO and GAC to ensure early and active communication and engagement.
>>
>>  Carlos Ra?l Guti?rrez
>>  Chair ISOC Costa Rica Chapter
>>  _____________________
>>
>> email:    crg at isoc-cr.org
>> Skype:   carlos.raulg
>>               +506 8335 2487
>>
>>  La Internet Society (ISOC) es una organizaci?n internacional sin fines
>> de lucro fundada en 1992 para proporcionar liderazgo en est?ndares
>> relacionados educaci?n y pol?tica de Internet. Con oficinas en Washington
>> DC, Estados Unidos, y en Ginebra, Suiza, busca asegurar el desarrollo, la
>> evoluci?n y la utilizaci?n de Internet en beneficio de las personas en todo
>> el mundo.
>>
>>  El 15/09/2014, a las 08:58, Amr Elsadr <aelsadr at EGYPTIG.ORG> escribi?:
>>
>>  Hi,
>>
>>  I?ve tried to capture the essence of the different comments submitted
>> by NCSG members including, Milton, Robin, Ed, Avri, Wisdom and my own. I
>> don?t know if it does them all justice, but I?ve posted it here:
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ISi_1cIaG3Hl4hzCM2VVc8sBsqGJQw6WR3vr6tptUcI/edit?usp=sharing
>>
>>  If I?ve missed any other comments submitted by NCSG members, please let
>> me know.
>>
>>  The document is open for viewing and editing, but it?d be helpful if
>> folks highlighted and commented on proposed changes so I can keep track of
>> them.
>>
>>  Thanks.
>>
>>  Amr
>>
>>  On Sep 12, 2014, at 2:50 PM, Amr Elsadr <aelsadr at egyptig.org> wrote:
>>
>>  Hi,
>>
>>  I could try to consolidate the comments submitted by NCSG members into
>> one document and see if folks like it. I believe that they all cover
>> different and important aspects of why the proposed by-laws amendment is
>> really bad!!
>>
>>  Thanks.
>>
>>  Amr
>>
>>  On Sep 10, 2014, at 12:45 PM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at GMAIL.COM>
>> wrote:
>>
>>  Hi,
>>
>>  Thanks Avri again for submitting your contribution and sharing it with
>> us.
>> we had discussion within NCSG list about the proposal and maybe it is
>> time to summarise a common position on that matter. we need volunteer(s) to
>> collect the opinions shared in the list and draft a comment for review.
>>  the deadline is 14th september but we have still the reply period we can
>> use to submit our comment.
>>
>>
>> https://www.icann.org/public-comments/bylaws-amend-gac-advice-2014-08-15-en
>>
>>  @Amr @Kathy you participated in the discussion is it possible to
>> volunteer for drafting a NCSG contribution?
>>
>>  Thanks!
>>
>>  Best,
>>
>>  Rafik
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Avri Doria <avri at acm.org>
>> Date: 2014-09-09 3:23 GMT+09:00
>> Subject: [NCSG-Discuss] Submitted individual comment on GAC advice
>> amendment
>> To: NCSG-DISCUSS at listserv.syr.edu
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I submitted an individual comment.
>>
>>
>> http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-bylaws-amend-gac-advice-15aug14/msg00017.html
>>
>>
>> avri
>>
>>  _______________________________________________
>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  _______________________________________________
>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PC-NCSG mailing listPC-NCSG at ipjustice.orghttp://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>
>>
>>  _______________________________________________
>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20141006/c9b3b9a9/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the NCSG-PC mailing list