[PC-NCSG] CCWG-Accountability
Amr Elsadr
aelsadr
Mon Nov 24 14:38:26 EET 2014
No objection from me. I hope we manage to populate this CWG with NCSG participants to support Robin and Joy.
Thanks.
Amr
On Nov 23, 2014, at 8:58 AM, Avri Doria <avri at ACM.ORG> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In which case, unless there is an objection, Robin is the NCSG member for the CCWG-Accountabilty.
>
> I will delete the doodle poll.
>
> Thanks
>
> avri
>
> On 23-Nov-14 11:39, joy wrote:
>> Hi all
>> I really must profusely apologise for not picking up earlier that this would
>> need a vote (I was just volunteering to help and think I was confused between
>> this and the Policy Committee vote for Chair). I'm really sorry, and would like
>> to withdraw from this. Robin, you are a great candidate and I am happy to
>> support you!
>> Regards
>>
>> Joy
>> On 23/11/2014 4:36 p.m., Avri Doria wrote:
>> > Ok.
>> >
>> > Poll is setup
>> >
>> > http://doodle.com/6ys85r6pd9z97ndx
>> >
>> > Open until 25 Nov UTC
>> >
>> > avri
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On 23-Nov-14 05:20, Rafik Dammak wrote:
>> >> Hi Avri,
>> >>
>> >> the window for any objections was fairly open for days. I do think we can
>> >> move to voting.
>> >>
>> >> Rafik
>> >>
>> >> 2014-11-23 4:25 GMT+09:00 Avri Doria<avri at acm.org>:
>> >>
>> >>> Hi
>> >>>
>> >>> I have been waiting, hoping to hear at least one of the NPOC voices before
>> >>> proceeding.
>> >>>
>> >>> If you disagree, please say so, but the silent treatment?
>> >>>
>> >>> Anyone?
>> >>>
>> >>> We seem to have agreement on the NCUC side of the SG to move ahead with a
>> >>> vote between the candidates. And no new candidates have surfaced.
>> >>>
>> >>> Now the ccNSO has approved the charter. Any chance we can become
>> >>> functional on this?
>> >>>
>> >>> avri
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On 18-Nov-14 10:41, Avri Doria wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Hi,
>> >>>
>> >>> The charter has passed the GNSO and is working its way through the other
>> >>> ACSO.
>> >>>
>> >>> We need to select someone to be the NCSG Member of the group
>> >>> (remembering that as many of us can participate as want, only one is a
>> >>> member whose special role only comes up in the event of determining
>> >>> whether there is rough consensus or a vote in a case where there isn't
>> >>> an obvious consensus)
>> >>> As we learned on the CCWG-Stewardship, may be the supported traveler for
>> >>> a f2f meeting, if any f2f meeting is arranged.
>> >>>
>> >>> I think that 2 people have volunteered. Robin & Joy.
>> >>> I think both are qualified as long as they are committed to the time it
>> >>> takes.
>> >>> (note: the deluge of work for the CSG-Stewardship took even me by surprise)
>> >>>
>> >>> I think that for the last week we have had no new volunteers.
>> >>>
>> >>> I think that it is time for us to make a selection.
>> >>>
>> >>> Does anyone object to setting up a simple doodle poll to select which of
>> >>> them is the member?
>> >>> I would suggest that the other be a designated backup for the member
>> >>> ready to jump in, in the case that the member can't travel or can't, for
>> >>> any other reason, complete the task.
>> >>>
>> >>> Any support for this course of action? And objections?
>> >>> I will probably wait a day or so before doing anything while waiting for
>> >>> objection from anyone on the PC.
>> >>>
>> >>> (As always if the alt-chair wants to assert his authority over any
>> >>> actions I am taking, I will set my plans aside. I am just trying to fill
>> >>> a gap here and make sure we are ready in time.)
>> >>>
>> >>> avri
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> -------- Original Message --------
>> >>> Subject: [council] GNSO Council resolution 13 November 2014
>> >>> Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 16:06:37 +0000
>> >>> From: Glen de Saint G?ry<Glen at icann.org> <Glen at icann.org>
>> >>> To: Council GNSO<council at gnso.icann.org> <council at gnso.icann.org>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Dear Councillors,
>> >>>
>> >>> Ahead of the official Council minutes, the following resolution was
>> >>> passed at the GNSO Council meeting on 13 November 2014.
>> >>>
>> >>> Adoption of a Charter for a Cross Community Working Group on Enhancing
>> >>> ICANN Accountability
>> >>>
>> >>> Whereas,
>> >>>
>> >>> 1. The National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA)
>> >>> has requested that ICANN "convene a multistakeholder process to develop
>> >>> a plan to transition
>> >>> the U.S. government stewardship role" with regard to the IANA Functions
>> >>> and related root zone management.
>> >>>
>> >>> 2. During discussions around the transition process, the community
>> >>> raised the broader topic of the impact of the change on ICANN's
>> >>> accountability given its historical
>> >>> contractual relationship with the United States and NTIA. Accountability
>> >>> in this context is defined, according to the Netmundial multistakeholder
>> >>> statement[1], as the
>> >>> existence of mechanisms for independent checks and balances as well as
>> >>> for review and redress.
>> >>>
>> >>> 3. The concerns raised during these discussions around the transition
>> >>> process indicate that the level of trust into the existing ICANN
>> >>> accountability mechanisms does
>> >>> not yet meet some stakeholder's expectations. Considering that the NTIA
>> >>> has stressed that it was expecting community consensus regarding the
>> >>> transition, this gap
>> >>> between the current situation and stakeholder expectations may prevent
>> >>> the transition to proceed.
>> >>>
>> >>> 4. A DT was formed with participants, amongst others, from the ccNSO,
>> >>> GNSO, ASO and ALAC to develop a charter for a Cross Community Working
>> >>> Group on
>> >>> Enhancing ICANN Accountability.
>> >>>
>> >>> 5. The DT delivered the proposed charter for consideration to all the
>> >>> ICANN Supporting Organizations and Advisory Committees for consideration
>> >>> (see:http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/enhancing-accountability-charter-03nov14-en.pdf)
>> >>>
>> >>> Resolved,
>> >>>
>> >>> 1. The GNSO Council approves the Charter
>> >>> (http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/enhancing-accountability-charter-03nov14-en.pdf)
>> >>> and appoints Thomas Rickert as the GNSO Council liaison and GNSO
>> >>> co-chair to the CWG.
>> >>>
>> >>> 2. Each GNSO Stakeholder Group will identify one member for the CWG by
>> >>> 20 November taking into account the charter requirement that best
>> >>> efforts should be
>> >>> made to ensure that members:
>> >>>
>> >>> ? Have sufficient expertise to participate in the applicable
>> >>> subject matter
>> >>> (see for examplehttps://www.icann.org/resources/pages/enhancing-accountability-faqs-2014-08-22-en#12
>> >>> for areas identified for expertise);
>> >>>
>> >>> ? Commit to actively participate in the activities of the CWG on
>> >>> an ongoing and long-term basis; and
>> >>>
>> >>> ? Where appropriate, solicit and communicate the views and
>> >>> concerns of individuals in the organization that appoints them.
>> >>>
>> >>> 3. The GNSO will collaborate with the other SOs and ACs to issue a call
>> >>> for participants to join the CWG, each in accordance with its own rules.
>> >>>
>> >>> [1]http://netmundial.br/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/NETmundial-Multistakeholder-Document.pdf
>> >>> Please let me know if you have any questions.
>> >>> Thank you.
>> >>> Kind regards.
>> >>> Glen
>> >>>
>> >>> Glen de Saint G?ry
>> >>> GNSOSecretariatgnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.orghttp://gnso.icann.org
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> PC-NCSG mailinglistPC-NCSG at ipjustice.orghttp://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>> >>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>> >>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > PC-NCSG mailing list
>> > PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>> > http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20141124/1112d6a1/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the NCSG-PC
mailing list