[PC-NCSG] CCWG-Accountability

Sun Nov 23 09:58:01 EET 2014

Hi,

In which case, unless there is an objection, Robin is the NCSG member
for the CCWG-Accountabilty.

I will delete the doodle poll.

Thanks

avri

On 23-Nov-14 11:39, joy wrote:
> Hi all
> I really must profusely apologise for not picking up earlier that this would 
> need a vote (I was just volunteering to help and think I was confused between 
> this and the Policy Committee vote for Chair). I'm  really sorry, and would like 
> to withdraw from this. Robin, you are a great candidate and I am happy to 
> support you!
> Regards
>
> Joy
> On 23/11/2014 4:36 p.m., Avri Doria wrote:
> > Ok.
> >
> > Poll is setup
> >
> > http://doodle.com/6ys85r6pd9z97ndx
> >
> > Open until 25 Nov UTC
> >
> > avri
> >
> >
> >
> > On 23-Nov-14 05:20, Rafik Dammak wrote:
> >> Hi Avri,
> >>
> >> the window for any objections was fairly open for days. I do think we can
> >> move to voting.
> >>
> >> Rafik
> >>
> >> 2014-11-23 4:25 GMT+09:00 Avri Doria<avri at acm.org>:
> >>
> >>>   Hi
> >>>
> >>> I have been waiting, hoping to hear at least one of the NPOC voices before
> >>> proceeding.
> >>>
> >>> If you disagree, please say so, but the silent treatment?
> >>>
> >>> Anyone?
> >>>
> >>> We seem to have agreement on the NCUC side of the SG to move ahead with a
> >>> vote between the candidates.  And no new candidates have surfaced.
> >>>
> >>> Now the ccNSO has approved the charter.  Any chance we can become
> >>> functional on this?
> >>>
> >>> avri
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 18-Nov-14 10:41, Avri Doria wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> The charter has passed the GNSO and is working its way through the other
> >>> ACSO.
> >>>
> >>> We need to select someone to be the NCSG Member of the group
> >>> (remembering that as many of us can participate as want, only one is a
> >>> member whose special role only comes up in the event of determining
> >>> whether there is rough consensus or  a vote in a case where there isn't
> >>> an obvious consensus)
> >>> As we learned on the CCWG-Stewardship, may be the supported traveler for
> >>> a f2f meeting, if any f2f meeting is arranged.
> >>>
> >>> I think that 2 people have volunteered.  Robin & Joy.
> >>> I think both are qualified as long as they are committed to the time it
> >>> takes.
> >>> (note: the deluge of work for the CSG-Stewardship took even me by surprise)
> >>>
> >>> I think that for the last week we have had no new volunteers.
> >>>
> >>> I think that it is time for us to make a selection.
> >>>
> >>> Does anyone object to setting up a simple doodle poll to select which of
> >>> them is the member?
> >>> I would suggest that the other be a designated backup for the member
> >>> ready to jump in, in the case that the member can't travel or can't, for
> >>> any other reason, complete the task.
> >>>
> >>> Any support for this course of action? And objections?
> >>> I will probably wait a day or so before doing anything while waiting for
> >>> objection from anyone on the PC.
> >>>
> >>> (As always if the alt-chair wants to assert his authority over any
> >>> actions I am taking, I will set my plans aside. I am just trying to fill
> >>> a gap here and make sure we are ready in time.)
> >>>
> >>> avri
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> -------- Original Message --------
> >>> Subject:     [council] GNSO Council resolution 13 November 2014
> >>> Date:     Thu, 13 Nov 2014 16:06:37 +0000
> >>> From:     Glen de Saint G?ry<Glen at icann.org>  <Glen at icann.org>
> >>> To:     Council GNSO<council at gnso.icann.org>  <council at gnso.icann.org>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Dear Councillors,
> >>>
> >>> Ahead of the official Council minutes, the following resolution was
> >>> passed at the GNSO Council meeting on 13 November 2014.
> >>>
> >>> Adoption of a Charter for a Cross Community Working Group on Enhancing
> >>> ICANN Accountability
> >>>
> >>> Whereas,
> >>>
> >>> 1. The National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA)
> >>> has requested that ICANN "convene a multistakeholder process to develop
> >>> a plan to transition
> >>>   the U.S. government stewardship role" with regard to the IANA Functions
> >>> and related root zone management.
> >>>
> >>> 2. During discussions around the transition process, the community
> >>> raised the broader topic of the impact of the change on ICANN's
> >>> accountability given its historical
> >>> contractual relationship with the United States and NTIA. Accountability
> >>> in this context is defined, according to the Netmundial multistakeholder
> >>> statement[1], as the
> >>> existence of mechanisms for independent checks and balances as well as
> >>> for review and redress.
> >>>
> >>> 3. The concerns raised during these discussions around the transition
> >>> process indicate that the level of trust into the existing ICANN
> >>> accountability mechanisms does
> >>> not yet meet some stakeholder's expectations. Considering that the NTIA
> >>> has stressed that it was expecting community consensus regarding the
> >>> transition, this gap
> >>> between the current situation and stakeholder expectations may prevent
> >>> the transition to proceed.
> >>>
> >>> 4. A DT was formed with participants, amongst others, from the ccNSO,
> >>> GNSO, ASO and ALAC to develop a charter for a Cross Community Working
> >>> Group on
> >>> Enhancing ICANN Accountability.
> >>>
> >>> 5. The DT delivered the proposed charter for consideration to all the
> >>> ICANN Supporting Organizations and Advisory Committees for consideration
> >>> (see:http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/enhancing-accountability-charter-03nov14-en.pdf)
> >>>
> >>> Resolved,
> >>>
> >>> 1. The GNSO Council approves the Charter
> >>> (http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/enhancing-accountability-charter-03nov14-en.pdf)
> >>> and appoints Thomas Rickert as the GNSO Council liaison and GNSO
> >>> co-chair to the CWG.
> >>>
> >>> 2. Each GNSO Stakeholder Group will identify one member for the CWG by
> >>> 20 November taking into account the charter requirement that best
> >>> efforts should be
> >>> made to ensure that members:
> >>>
> >>> ?        Have sufficient expertise to participate in the applicable
> >>> subject matter
> >>>         (see for examplehttps://www.icann.org/resources/pages/enhancing-accountability-faqs-2014-08-22-en#12
> >>> for areas identified for expertise);
> >>>
> >>> ?        Commit to actively participate in the activities of the CWG on
> >>> an ongoing and long-term basis; and
> >>>
> >>> ?        Where appropriate, solicit and communicate the views and
> >>> concerns of individuals in the organization that appoints them.
> >>>
> >>> 3. The GNSO will collaborate with the other SOs and ACs to issue a call
> >>> for participants to join the CWG, each in accordance with its own rules.
> >>>
> >>> [1]http://netmundial.br/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/NETmundial-Multistakeholder-Document.pdf
> >>> Please let me know if you have any questions.
> >>> Thank you.
> >>> Kind regards.
> >>> Glen
> >>>
> >>> Glen de Saint G?ry
> >>> GNSOSecretariatgnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.orghttp://gnso.icann.org
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> PC-NCSG mailinglistPC-NCSG at ipjustice.orghttp://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> PC-NCSG mailing list
> >>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> >>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
> >>>
> >>>
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > PC-NCSG mailing list
> > PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> > http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20141123/ae1bd29d/attachment.html>