[PC-NCSG] [urgent] 2 process for PC to act
Stephanie Perrin
stephanie.perrin
Tue Nov 11 18:14:44 EET 2014
1. I am ok with these nominations, and suggest we ask everyone to vote,
and if there are no objections, send the results by the end of the week.
2. Can the Vice-Chair please take charge of this now so we meet the
deadlines? Thanks.
3. Rafik I believe I asked this question previously, what is your
deadline for receiving a vote of the PC on these issues? in other
words, deadline minus how many hours, allowing for the fact that you are
UTC +9, Rudi is UTC +1, and those in US/Canada seem to be either UTC-5
or UTC-8. I am thinking you need to know one full day ahead, ie
thursday if the deadline is friday....
cheers SP
On 14-11-11 7:34 AM, Rafik Dammak wrote:
> Hi Marilia,
>
>
> 1. Could you please refresh our minds on how the 6 seats for GNSO
> were allocated within stakeholder groups and constituencies? Who
> are the representatives already appointed among the six?
>
>
> the CCWG IG didn't receive any name yet from Registry, Registrars,
> IPC, ISPC, BC and of course NCSG. councillors may know before me such
> info expecting that groups will send names to GNSO council.
>
> Even not being in the PC, I would like to express a +1 for Bill.
>
>
> as councillor you are member of PC :)
>
>
> The relevant articles of the charter are the following, I think:
>
> There shall be a minimum of two Members (excluding
> the appointed Co-Chair) from
> each participating SO and AC and a maximum of six (
> 6) Members (excluding the
> appointed Co-Chair) from each participating SO and
> AC, with the maximum number
> of Members subject to review by the WG Co-Chairs sh
> ould they determine that the
> workload and progress of the WG would be facilitate
> d by having additional
> Members.
>
> In addition, all SOs and ACs may appoint Observers
> if permitted by and in
> accordance with their own rules and procedures. Suc
> h Observers are entitled to
> participatein WG deliberations on an equal footing
> with the Members except for
> formal voting, when called for by the Co-Chairs of
> the WG. Voting is limited only to
> Members. The number of Observers appointed by each
> SO and AC shall not exceed
> the number of Members appointed by that SO or AC.
>
>
> better to check the GNSO resolutions
> <http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/resolutions#201410> voted in LA
>
> "Resolved:
>
> 1. The GNSO Council approves the Charter
> http://ccnso.icann.org/workinggroups/ccwg-ig-charter-20may14-en.pdf
> 2. The RrSG, the RySG, NCSG, BC, IPC, and ISPC will each identify one
> member to serve on the CWG-IG by 22-October-2014 taking into
> account the charter requirement that best efforts should be made
> to ensure that members:
> * Have sufficient expertise to participate in the applicable
> subject matter;
> * Commit to actively participate in the activities of the CWG-IG
> on an ongoing and long-term basis; and
> * Where appropriate, solicit and communicate the views and
> concerns of individuals in the organization that appoints them.
> 3. The GNSO will collaborate with the other SOs and ACs to issue a
> call for observers to join the CWG-IG, each in accordance with its
> own rules.
> 4. As the charter calls for each of the chartering organizations to
> appoint a co-chair for the group, the GNSO Council appoints Rafik
> Dammak to serve as a member of the CWG-IG, to serve as the GNSO
> co-chair of the CWG-IG and to serve as GNSO Council liaison to the
> group."
>
> 2. Could you remind us of who already expressed interest for the
> CCWG accountability?
>
>
> that was done in the NCSG list.
> if I am not mistaking, it was Robin, Joy. I hope I am not missing anyone
>
> Rafik
>
>
> Thanks
> Mar?lia
>
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 9:36 AM, Rafik Dammak
> <rafik.dammak at gmail.com <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> we have 2 process to act on:
> 1- appointing a NCSG representative to the CCWG on IG. there
> is support in NCSG mailing to appoint Bill Drake and support
> within PC. can we make the final call and move forward
> 2- we have the process to appoint a NCSG rep to CCWG on
> accountability which charter should be approved during the
> GNSO council this thursday. if I understand correctly, we got
> expression of interests already and the call is still open (I
> assume till the end of this week). the PC can make the
> appointments.
>
> we need to act quickly ,
>
> Rafik
>
> 2014-10-27 20:16 GMT+09:00 Amr Elsadr <aelsadr at egyptig.org
> <mailto:aelsadr at egyptig.org>>:
>
> Hi,
>
> Yes..., it would be good of Rudi to set a deadline for a
> consensus call.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Amr
>
> On Oct 27, 2014, at 1:00 AM, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org
> <mailto:avri at acm.org>> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Well, I guess it is for Rudi, our continuing alt-chair to
>> make that call.
>>
>> I repeat my support for Bill Drake as expressed on the
>> discuss list.
>> I plan to continue as an observer/participant.
>>
>> avri
>>
>> On 26-Oct-14 19:15, Rafik Dammak wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> can the PC make decision and sent the name to GNSO council and CCWG on IG?
>>>
>>> Rafik
>>>
>>> 2014-10-20 0:48 GMT+09:00 Amr Elsadr<aelsadr at egyptig.org> <mailto:aelsadr at egyptig.org>:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> During the public GNSO council meeting in Los Angeles, the council adopted
>>>> the charter of the Cross-Community Working Group of Internet Governance
>>>> (CCWG-IG), as well as the manner in which the GNSO would be represented by
>>>> members of this CCWG. The resolution can be found here:
>>>> http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/resolutions#201410
>>>>
>>>> It was also agreed that each GNSO group should identify its representative
>>>> by October 22nd, which is only in a few days. I thought I'd get the
>>>> nomination process started by nominating Bill Drake to represent the NCSG
>>>> as a member of this group. Bill's already been active on this group, and
>>>> certainly meets the desirable criteria of membership.
>>>>
>>>> For easier reference, here is the exact language of the resolution:
>>>>
>>>> *20141015-2*
>>>>
>>>> *Adoption of a Charter for a Cross Community Working Group to discuss
>>>> Internet governance (CWG-IG) issues affecting ICANN and make
>>>> recommendations to the chartering organization on these issues*
>>>> Whereas,
>>>>
>>>> 1. This group was initiated in December 2013 in response to a call
>>>> from ICANN CEO and has been working informally since then;
>>>> 2. The group has developed the charter found at
>>>> http://ccnso.icann.org/workinggroups/ccwg-ig-charter-20may14-en.pdf
>>>> 3. This charter has already been approved by ALAC, ccNSO and SSAC.
>>>>
>>>> Resolved:
>>>>
>>>> 1. The GNSO Council approves the Charter
>>>> http://ccnso.icann.org/workinggroups/ccwg-ig-charter-20may14-en.pdf
>>>> 2. The RrSG, the RySG, NCSG, BC, IPC, and ISPC will each identify one
>>>> member to serve on the CWG-IG by 22-October-2014 taking into account the
>>>> charter requirement that best efforts should be made to ensure that members:
>>>> - Have sufficient expertise to participate in the applicable
>>>> subject matter;
>>>> - Commit to actively participate in the activities of the CWG-IG on
>>>> an ongoing and long-term basis; and
>>>> - Where appropriate, solicit and communicate the views and concerns
>>>> of individuals in the organization that appoints them.
>>>> 3. The GNSO will collaborate with the other SOs and ACs to issue a
>>>> call for observers to join the CWG-IG, each in accordance with its own
>>>> rules.
>>>> 4. As the charter calls for each of the chartering organizations to
>>>> appoint a co-chair for the group, the GNSO Council appoints Rafik Dammak to
>>>> serve as a member of the CWG-IG, to serve as the GNSO co-chair of the
>>>> CWG-IG and to serve as GNSO Council liaison to the group.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>>> Amr
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>>>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>
>
>
>
> --
> *Mar?lia Maciel*
> Pesquisadora Gestora - Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade - FGV
> Direito Rio
> Researcher and Coordinator - Center for Technology & Society - FGV
> Law School
> http://direitorio.fgv.br/cts
>
> DiploFoundation associate - www.diplomacy.edu
> <http://www.diplomacy.edu>
> PoliTICs Magazine Advisory Committee - http://www.politics.org.br/
> Subscribe "Digital Rights: Latin America & the Caribbean" -
> http://www.digitalrightslac.net/en
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20141111/1babb57e/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the NCSG-PC
mailing list