[PC-NCSG] Fwd: Call for GNSO Members - Forming GNSO Review Working Party
Rafik Dammak
rafik.dammak
Tue May 20 06:15:41 EEST 2014
Thanks Joy! we should discuss the points we wants to talk with Bill.
Rafik
2014-05-20 12:14 GMT+09:00 joy <joy at apc.org>:
> Hi Rafik - I have also filled in the doodle poll and am happy to join
> this call
> joy
> On 20/05/2014 3:11 p.m., Rafik Dammak wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> seeing no objection and because the deadline, I will send the list to GNSO
> secretariat: Amr, Avri, Klaus. Rudi and myself.
> however, if needed I can send updated list to Glen if PC members has any
> comment.
>
> Best Regards.
>
> Rafik
>
>
> 2014-05-19 16:56 GMT+09:00 Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>:
>
>
> Rudi,
>
> thanks, I think that you didn't mention your own candidature, but you said
> you will get back with names. I will add your name anyway.
>
> Rafik
>
>
> 2014-05-19 16:51 GMT+09:00 Rudi Vansnick <rudi.vansnick at isoc.be> <rudi.vansnick at isoc.be>:
>
> I thought I mentioned earlier my candidature for this WG. So add my name
>
> to this list.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Rudi Vansnick
> NPOC chair Policy Committee
> NPOC treasurerrudi.vansnick at npoc.org
> Tel : +32 (0)9 329 39 16
> Mobile : +32 (0)475 28 16 32www.npoc.org
>
> Op 19-mei-2014, om 02:17 heeft Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> het
> volgende geschreven:
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> I have to send names by today, we have till now: Amr, Avri, Klaus and
> myself.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Rafik
>
> 2014-05-14 11:37 GMT+09:00 Klaus Stoll <klaus.stoll at gkpfoundation.org> <klaus.stoll at gkpfoundation.org>:
>
>
> Dear Friends
>
> I am also interested serving in this working party.
>
> Yours
>
> Klaus
>
>
> On 5/13/2014 8:15 AM, Rafik Dammak wrote:
>
> Dear PC members,
>
> we have here an important process where we should appoint members to
> GNSO review working group. we can appoint up to 6 members for NCSG.
>
> I think that Avri is already member. I am also interested to join this
> WG.
>
> the participation request time commitment for the next months and it is
> quite critical for us.
>
> I will share the call with the membership list, but as PC we should
> decide who will be our members in the WG. we have to send the names by
> 19th May
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Rafik
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Glen de Saint G?ry <Glen at icann.org> <Glen at icann.org>
> Date: 2014-05-13 1:04 GMT+09:00
> Subject: Call for GNSO Members - Forming GNSO Review Working Party
> To: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
> Cc: Marika Konings <marika.konings at icann.org> <marika.konings at icann.org>, "Larisa B. Gurnick" <larisa.gurnick at icann.org>, "gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org" <gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org> <gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org
> >
>
>
>
>
> Dear Rafik,
>
>
> Please note the Call for GNSO Members - Forming GNSO Review Working
> Party and please note the very tight timeframe.
> Thank you.
>
> Kind regards,
>
>
> Glen
>
> *Summary*
>
> Following the GNSO Council meeting on 8 May 2014, the GNSO Council would
> like to extend the invitation to join the GNSO Review Working Party to
> members of the GNSO community. The make-up of the Working Party is expected
> to reflect that of the GNSO community, with the opportunity for other
> Supporting Organizations and Advisory Committees to appoint an observer
> should they decide so.
>
> *Tasks of the GNSO Review Working Group Party*
>
> The task of the GNSO Review Working Group Party will be to:
>
> 1. Function as a liaison between the GNSO, the independent examiner
> and the Board?s Structural Improvements Committee;
> 2. Provide input on review criteria and the 360 Assessment[1];
> 3. Serve as additional conduit for input from, and requests to, GNSO
> constituencies/stakeholder groups, Council;
> 4. Act as sounding board: offer objective guidance, reactions and
> comments to any preliminary conclusions and assessment and helping to
> ensure the draft report issued by the independent examiner accurately
> reflects the GNSO structure, scope and dynamics;
> 5. Coordinate with the GNSO community to prepare an Implementation
> Plan and champion implementation of improvement activities;
> 6. Perform support communication/awareness activities to encourage
> participation.
>
> *Volunteer Requirements*
>
> The membership of the GNSO Review Working Party is proposed to include
> members representing the diversity of the GNSO community, mirroring the
> make-up of the GNSO Council (up to 3 representatives from the Registry
> Stakeholder Group, up to 3 representatives from the Registrar Stakeholder
> Group, up to 2 representatives from the Nominating Committee appointees, up
> to 2 representatives from the Business Constituency, up to 2 representative
> from the Intellectual Property Constituency, up to 2 representatives from
> the Internet Service and Connectivity Providers Constituency, up to 6
> representatives from the Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group, in addition to
> the possibility for other SO/ACs to appoint 1 observer to the effort). The
> activities of the GNSO Review Working Party will be conducted in an open
> and fully transparent manner.
>
> Knowledge of the GNSO structure and operations as well as experience in
> evaluating performance and processes based on a set of objective criteria
> would be useful. Members are expected to participate actively and to
> devote sufficient time to the process. Time commitment is expected to be 50
> ? 80 hours within the next 9 months, with work commencing immediately.
> Commitment to and compliance with ICANN?s bottom-up, multistakeholder
> model, and accountability and transparency ethics are a requirement.
>
> *Submitting candidates*
>
> Each Stakeholder Group / Constituency is expected to determine their own
> process for selecting members for this effort taking into account the
> requirements, especially in relation to expected time commitment listed
> above. Stakeholder Groups/Constituencies may, but are not required to fill
> all the slots allocated to their respective groups. Ideally the names of
> the proposed candidates are submitted *by Monday 19 May at the latest*as work has already commenced. The names of the proposed candidates should
> be submitted to the GNSO Secretariat (gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org).
>
> *Background*
>
> The objective of the GNSO Review[2] is to examine organizational
> effectiveness of the GNSO, including its structure components (GNSO
> Council, GNSO Working Groups, GNSO Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies).
> The review scheduled to begin on or about 1 July 2014 will be tightly
> scoped based on objective and quantifiable criteria provided to the
> independent examiner.
>
> Involvement of the GNSO community as well as input and participation
> from the broader community are important components of this review process.
> As discussed in GNSO Council meetings, the Structural Improvements
> Committee of the Board (SIC) has requested that a GNSO Review Working Party
> be assembled to function as a liaison between the GNSO, the independent
> examiner and the SIC, to provide input on review criteria and the 360
> Assessment, coordinate interviews and objectively supply clarification and
> responses to the draft findings and recommendations. Once a final report is
> issued and the Board takes action on it, as appropriate, the GNSO Review
> Working Party is expected to coordinate with the GNSO community to prepare
> an Implementation Plan and champion implementation of improvement
> activities.
>
> Please see the recent announcement<http://gnso.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-22apr14-en.htm> <http://gnso.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-22apr14-en.htm> about
> the GNSO Review for additional information and background.
>
>
> *Further Information*
>
>
> Forming GNSO Review Working Party *Call for GNSO Members - Forming GNSO
> Review Working Party*
>
> *Summary*
>
> Following the GNSO Council meeting on 8 May 2014, the GNSO Council would
> like to extend the invitation to join the GNSO Review Working Party to
> members of the GNSO community. The make-up of the Working Party is expected
> to reflect that of the GNSO community, with the opportunity for other
> Supporting Organizations and Advisory Committees to appoint an observer
> should they decide so.
>
> *Tasks of the GNSO Review Working Group Party*
>
> The task of the GNSO Review Working Group Party will be to:
>
> 1. Function as a liaison between the GNSO, the independent examiner
> and the Board?s Structural Improvements Committee;
> 2. Provide input on review criteria and the 360 Assessment[3];
> 3. Serve as additional conduit for input from, and requests to, GNSO
> constituencies/stakeholder groups, Council;
> 4. Act as sounding board: offer objective guidance, reactions and
> comments to any preliminary conclusions and assessment and helping to
> ensure the draft report issued by the independent examiner accurately
> reflects the GNSO structure, scope and dynamics;
> 5. Coordinate with the GNSO community to prepare an Implementation
> Plan and champion implementation of improvement activities;
> 6. Perform support communication/awareness activities to encourage
> participation.
>
> *Volunteer Requirements*
>
> The membership of the GNSO Review Working Party is proposed to include
> members representing the diversity of the GNSO community, mirroring the
> make-up of the GNSO Council (up to 3 representatives from the Registry
> Stakeholder Group, up to 3 representatives from the Registrar Stakeholder
> Group, up to 2 representatives from the Nominating Committee appointees, up
> to 2 representatives from the Business Constituency, up to 2 representative
> from the Intellectual Property Constituency, up to 2 representatives from
> the Internet Service and Connectivity Providers Constituency, up to 6
> representatives from the Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group, in addition to
> the possibility for other SO/ACs to appoint 1 observer to the effort). The
> activities of the GNSO Review Working Party will be conducted in an open
> and fully transparent manner.
>
> Knowledge of the GNSO structure and operations as well as experience in
> evaluating performance and processes based on a set of objective criteria
> would be useful. Members are expected to participate actively and to
> devote sufficient time to the process. Time commitment is expected to be 50
> ? 80 hours within the next 9 months, with work commencing immediately.
> Commitment to and compliance with ICANN?s bottom-up, multi-stakeholder
> model, and accountability and transparency ethics are a requirement.
>
> *Submitting candidates*
>
> Each Stakeholder Group / Constituency is expected to determine their own
> process for selecting members for this effort taking into account the
> requirements, especially in relation to expected time commitment listed
> above. Stakeholder Groups/Constituencies may, but are not required to fill
> all the slots allocated to their respective groups. Ideally the names of
> the proposed candidates are submitted *by Monday 19 May at the latest*as work has already commenced. The names of the proposed candidates should
> be submitted to the GNSO Secretariat (gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org).
>
> *Background*
>
> The objective of the GNSO Review[4] is to examine organizational
> effectiveness of the GNSO, including its structure components (GNSO
> Council, GNSO Working Groups, GNSO Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies).
> The review scheduled to begin on or about 1 July 2014 will be tightly
> scoped based on objective and quantifiable criteria provided to the
> independent examiner.
>
> Involvement of the GNSO community as well as input and participation
> from the broader community are important components of this review process.
> As discussed in GNSO Council meetings, the Structural Improvements
> Committee of the Board (SIC) has requested that a GNSO Review Working Party
> be assembled to function as a liaison between the GNSO, the independent
> examiner and the SIC, to provide input on review criteria and the 360
> Assessment, coordinate interviews and objectively supply clarification and
> responses to the draft findings and recommendations. Once a final report is
> issued and the Board takes action on it, as appropriate, the GNSO Review
> Working Party is expected to coordinate with the GNSO community to prepare
> an Implementation Plan and champion implementation of improvement
> activities.
>
> Please see the recent announcement<http://gnso.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-22apr14-en.htm> <http://gnso.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-22apr14-en.htm>about the GNSO Review for additional information and background.
>
>
> *Further Information*
>
>
> ? Forming GNSO Review Working Party<http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/gnso-review-06may14-en.pdf> <http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/gnso-review-06may14-en.pdf>
>
>
> ? GNSO Review Webinar<http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-2-23apr14-en.htm.> <http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-2-23apr14-en.htm.>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Glen de Saint G?ry
>
> GNSO Secretariat
> gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org
> http://gnso.icann.org
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> ------------------------------
>
> [1] 360 Assessment is an online mechanism to collect and summarize
> feedback from members of the GNSO community ? a "self-review" relative to
> objective and quantifiable criteria. Interested members of other ICANN
> organizations, Board and staff also may offer feedback.
>
> [2] GNSO Review is mandated by ICANN?s Bylaws<http://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/bylaws#IV> <http://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/bylaws#IV>
> .
>
> [3] 360 Assessment is an online mechanism to collect and summarize
> feedback from members of the GNSO community ? a "self-review" relative to
> objective and quantifiable criteria. Interested members of other ICANN
> organizations, Board and staff also may offer feedback.
>
> [4] GNSO Review is mandated by ICANN?s Bylaws<http://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/bylaws#IV> <http://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/bylaws#IV>
> .
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing listPC-NCSG at ipjustice.orghttp://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing listPC-NCSG at ipjustice.orghttp://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20140520/cccd6ead/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the NCSG-PC
mailing list