[PC-NCSG] Fwd: Call for GNSO Members - Forming GNSO Review Working Party
joy
joy
Tue May 20 06:14:13 EEST 2014
Hi Rafik - I have also filled in the doodle poll and am happy to join
this call
joy
On 20/05/2014 3:11 p.m., Rafik Dammak wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> seeing no objection and because the deadline, I will send the list to GNSO
> secretariat: Amr, Avri, Klaus. Rudi and myself.
> however, if needed I can send updated list to Glen if PC members has any
> comment.
>
> Best Regards.
>
> Rafik
>
>
> 2014-05-19 16:56 GMT+09:00 Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>:
>
>> Rudi,
>>
>> thanks, I think that you didn't mention your own candidature, but you said
>> you will get back with names. I will add your name anyway.
>>
>> Rafik
>>
>>
>> 2014-05-19 16:51 GMT+09:00 Rudi Vansnick <rudi.vansnick at isoc.be>:
>>
>> I thought I mentioned earlier my candidature for this WG. So add my name
>>> to this list.
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>>
>>> Rudi Vansnick
>>> NPOC chair Policy Committee
>>> NPOC treasurer
>>> rudi.vansnick at npoc.org
>>> Tel : +32 (0)9 329 39 16
>>> Mobile : +32 (0)475 28 16 32
>>> www.npoc.org
>>>
>>> Op 19-mei-2014, om 02:17 heeft Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> het
>>> volgende geschreven:
>>>
>>> Hi everybody,
>>>
>>> I have to send names by today, we have till now: Amr, Avri, Klaus and
>>> myself.
>>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>>
>>> Rafik
>>>
>>> 2014-05-14 11:37 GMT+09:00 Klaus Stoll <klaus.stoll at gkpfoundation.org>:
>>>
>>>> Dear Friends
>>>>
>>>> I am also interested serving in this working party.
>>>>
>>>> Yours
>>>>
>>>> Klaus
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 5/13/2014 8:15 AM, Rafik Dammak wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Dear PC members,
>>>>
>>>> we have here an important process where we should appoint members to
>>>> GNSO review working group. we can appoint up to 6 members for NCSG.
>>>>
>>>> I think that Avri is already member. I am also interested to join this
>>>> WG.
>>>>
>>>> the participation request time commitment for the next months and it is
>>>> quite critical for us.
>>>>
>>>> I will share the call with the membership list, but as PC we should
>>>> decide who will be our members in the WG. we have to send the names by
>>>> 19th May
>>>>
>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Rafik
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: Glen de Saint G?ry <Glen at icann.org>
>>>> Date: 2014-05-13 1:04 GMT+09:00
>>>> Subject: Call for GNSO Members - Forming GNSO Review Working Party
>>>> To: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
>>>> Cc: Marika Konings <marika.konings at icann.org>, "Larisa B. Gurnick" <
>>>> larisa.gurnick at icann.org>, "gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org" <
>>>> gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Dear Rafik,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Please note the Call for GNSO Members - Forming GNSO Review Working
>>>> Party and please note the very tight timeframe.
>>>> Thank you.
>>>>
>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Glen
>>>>
>>>> *Summary*
>>>>
>>>> Following the GNSO Council meeting on 8 May 2014, the GNSO Council would
>>>> like to extend the invitation to join the GNSO Review Working Party to
>>>> members of the GNSO community. The make-up of the Working Party is expected
>>>> to reflect that of the GNSO community, with the opportunity for other
>>>> Supporting Organizations and Advisory Committees to appoint an observer
>>>> should they decide so.
>>>>
>>>> *Tasks of the GNSO Review Working Group Party*
>>>>
>>>> The task of the GNSO Review Working Group Party will be to:
>>>>
>>>> 1. Function as a liaison between the GNSO, the independent examiner
>>>> and the Board's Structural Improvements Committee;
>>>> 2. Provide input on review criteria and the 360 Assessment[1];
>>>> 3. Serve as additional conduit for input from, and requests to, GNSO
>>>> constituencies/stakeholder groups, Council;
>>>> 4. Act as sounding board: offer objective guidance, reactions and
>>>> comments to any preliminary conclusions and assessment and helping to
>>>> ensure the draft report issued by the independent examiner accurately
>>>> reflects the GNSO structure, scope and dynamics;
>>>> 5. Coordinate with the GNSO community to prepare an Implementation
>>>> Plan and champion implementation of improvement activities;
>>>> 6. Perform support communication/awareness activities to encourage
>>>> participation.
>>>>
>>>> *Volunteer Requirements*
>>>>
>>>> The membership of the GNSO Review Working Party is proposed to include
>>>> members representing the diversity of the GNSO community, mirroring the
>>>> make-up of the GNSO Council (up to 3 representatives from the Registry
>>>> Stakeholder Group, up to 3 representatives from the Registrar Stakeholder
>>>> Group, up to 2 representatives from the Nominating Committee appointees, up
>>>> to 2 representatives from the Business Constituency, up to 2 representative
>>>> from the Intellectual Property Constituency, up to 2 representatives from
>>>> the Internet Service and Connectivity Providers Constituency, up to 6
>>>> representatives from the Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group, in addition to
>>>> the possibility for other SO/ACs to appoint 1 observer to the effort). The
>>>> activities of the GNSO Review Working Party will be conducted in an open
>>>> and fully transparent manner.
>>>>
>>>> Knowledge of the GNSO structure and operations as well as experience in
>>>> evaluating performance and processes based on a set of objective criteria
>>>> would be useful. Members are expected to participate actively and to
>>>> devote sufficient time to the process. Time commitment is expected to be 50
>>>> -- 80 hours within the next 9 months, with work commencing immediately.
>>>> Commitment to and compliance with ICANN's bottom-up, multistakeholder
>>>> model, and accountability and transparency ethics are a requirement.
>>>>
>>>> *Submitting candidates*
>>>>
>>>> Each Stakeholder Group / Constituency is expected to determine their own
>>>> process for selecting members for this effort taking into account the
>>>> requirements, especially in relation to expected time commitment listed
>>>> above. Stakeholder Groups/Constituencies may, but are not required to fill
>>>> all the slots allocated to their respective groups. Ideally the names of
>>>> the proposed candidates are submitted *by Monday 19 May at the latest*as work has already commenced. The names of the proposed candidates should
>>>> be submitted to the GNSO Secretariat (gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org).
>>>>
>>>> *Background*
>>>>
>>>> The objective of the GNSO Review[2] is to examine organizational
>>>> effectiveness of the GNSO, including its structure components (GNSO
>>>> Council, GNSO Working Groups, GNSO Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies).
>>>> The review scheduled to begin on or about 1 July 2014 will be tightly
>>>> scoped based on objective and quantifiable criteria provided to the
>>>> independent examiner.
>>>>
>>>> Involvement of the GNSO community as well as input and participation
>>>> from the broader community are important components of this review process.
>>>> As discussed in GNSO Council meetings, the Structural Improvements
>>>> Committee of the Board (SIC) has requested that a GNSO Review Working Party
>>>> be assembled to function as a liaison between the GNSO, the independent
>>>> examiner and the SIC, to provide input on review criteria and the 360
>>>> Assessment, coordinate interviews and objectively supply clarification and
>>>> responses to the draft findings and recommendations. Once a final report is
>>>> issued and the Board takes action on it, as appropriate, the GNSO Review
>>>> Working Party is expected to coordinate with the GNSO community to prepare
>>>> an Implementation Plan and champion implementation of improvement
>>>> activities.
>>>>
>>>> Please see the recent announcement<http://gnso.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-22apr14-en.htm> about
>>>> the GNSO Review for additional information and background.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *Further Information*
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Forming GNSO Review Working Party *Call for GNSO Members - Forming GNSO
>>>> Review Working Party*
>>>>
>>>> *Summary*
>>>>
>>>> Following the GNSO Council meeting on 8 May 2014, the GNSO Council would
>>>> like to extend the invitation to join the GNSO Review Working Party to
>>>> members of the GNSO community. The make-up of the Working Party is expected
>>>> to reflect that of the GNSO community, with the opportunity for other
>>>> Supporting Organizations and Advisory Committees to appoint an observer
>>>> should they decide so.
>>>>
>>>> *Tasks of the GNSO Review Working Group Party*
>>>>
>>>> The task of the GNSO Review Working Group Party will be to:
>>>>
>>>> 1. Function as a liaison between the GNSO, the independent examiner
>>>> and the Board's Structural Improvements Committee;
>>>> 2. Provide input on review criteria and the 360 Assessment[3];
>>>> 3. Serve as additional conduit for input from, and requests to, GNSO
>>>> constituencies/stakeholder groups, Council;
>>>> 4. Act as sounding board: offer objective guidance, reactions and
>>>> comments to any preliminary conclusions and assessment and helping to
>>>> ensure the draft report issued by the independent examiner accurately
>>>> reflects the GNSO structure, scope and dynamics;
>>>> 5. Coordinate with the GNSO community to prepare an Implementation
>>>> Plan and champion implementation of improvement activities;
>>>> 6. Perform support communication/awareness activities to encourage
>>>> participation.
>>>>
>>>> *Volunteer Requirements*
>>>>
>>>> The membership of the GNSO Review Working Party is proposed to include
>>>> members representing the diversity of the GNSO community, mirroring the
>>>> make-up of the GNSO Council (up to 3 representatives from the Registry
>>>> Stakeholder Group, up to 3 representatives from the Registrar Stakeholder
>>>> Group, up to 2 representatives from the Nominating Committee appointees, up
>>>> to 2 representatives from the Business Constituency, up to 2 representative
>>>> from the Intellectual Property Constituency, up to 2 representatives from
>>>> the Internet Service and Connectivity Providers Constituency, up to 6
>>>> representatives from the Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group, in addition to
>>>> the possibility for other SO/ACs to appoint 1 observer to the effort). The
>>>> activities of the GNSO Review Working Party will be conducted in an open
>>>> and fully transparent manner.
>>>>
>>>> Knowledge of the GNSO structure and operations as well as experience in
>>>> evaluating performance and processes based on a set of objective criteria
>>>> would be useful. Members are expected to participate actively and to
>>>> devote sufficient time to the process. Time commitment is expected to be 50
>>>> -- 80 hours within the next 9 months, with work commencing immediately.
>>>> Commitment to and compliance with ICANN's bottom-up, multi-stakeholder
>>>> model, and accountability and transparency ethics are a requirement.
>>>>
>>>> *Submitting candidates*
>>>>
>>>> Each Stakeholder Group / Constituency is expected to determine their own
>>>> process for selecting members for this effort taking into account the
>>>> requirements, especially in relation to expected time commitment listed
>>>> above. Stakeholder Groups/Constituencies may, but are not required to fill
>>>> all the slots allocated to their respective groups. Ideally the names of
>>>> the proposed candidates are submitted *by Monday 19 May at the latest*as work has already commenced. The names of the proposed candidates should
>>>> be submitted to the GNSO Secretariat (gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org).
>>>>
>>>> *Background*
>>>>
>>>> The objective of the GNSO Review[4] is to examine organizational
>>>> effectiveness of the GNSO, including its structure components (GNSO
>>>> Council, GNSO Working Groups, GNSO Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies).
>>>> The review scheduled to begin on or about 1 July 2014 will be tightly
>>>> scoped based on objective and quantifiable criteria provided to the
>>>> independent examiner.
>>>>
>>>> Involvement of the GNSO community as well as input and participation
>>>> from the broader community are important components of this review process.
>>>> As discussed in GNSO Council meetings, the Structural Improvements
>>>> Committee of the Board (SIC) has requested that a GNSO Review Working Party
>>>> be assembled to function as a liaison between the GNSO, the independent
>>>> examiner and the SIC, to provide input on review criteria and the 360
>>>> Assessment, coordinate interviews and objectively supply clarification and
>>>> responses to the draft findings and recommendations. Once a final report is
>>>> issued and the Board takes action on it, as appropriate, the GNSO Review
>>>> Working Party is expected to coordinate with the GNSO community to prepare
>>>> an Implementation Plan and champion implementation of improvement
>>>> activities.
>>>>
>>>> Please see the recent announcement<http://gnso.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-22apr14-en.htm>about the GNSO Review for additional information and background.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *Further Information*
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ? Forming GNSO Review Working Party<http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/gnso-review-06may14-en.pdf>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ? GNSO Review Webinar<http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-2-23apr14-en.htm.>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Glen de Saint G?ry
>>>>
>>>> GNSO Secretariat
>>>>
>>>> gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org
>>>>
>>>> http://gnso.icann.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> [1] 360 Assessment is an online mechanism to collect and summarize
>>>> feedback from members of the GNSO community --- a "self-review" relative to
>>>> objective and quantifiable criteria. Interested members of other ICANN
>>>> organizations, Board and staff also may offer feedback.
>>>>
>>>> [2] GNSO Review is mandated by ICANN's Bylaws<http://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/bylaws#IV>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>> [3] 360 Assessment is an online mechanism to collect and summarize
>>>> feedback from members of the GNSO community --- a "self-review" relative to
>>>> objective and quantifiable criteria. Interested members of other ICANN
>>>> organizations, Board and staff also may offer feedback.
>>>>
>>>> [4] GNSO Review is mandated by ICANN's Bylaws<http://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/bylaws#IV>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> PC-NCSG mailing listPC-NCSG at ipjustice.orghttp://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20140520/ff7df537/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: joy.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 229 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20140520/ff7df537/attachment-0001.vcf>
More information about the NCSG-PC
mailing list