[PC-NCSG] Fwd: Call for GNSO Members - Forming GNSO Review Working Party
Klaus Stoll
klaus.stoll
Wed May 14 05:37:57 EEST 2014
Dear Friends
I am also interested serving in this working party.
Yours
Klaus
On 5/13/2014 8:15 AM, Rafik Dammak wrote:
>
> Dear PC members,
>
> we have here an important process where we should appoint members to
> GNSO review working group. we can appoint up to 6 members for NCSG.
>
> I think that Avri is already member. I am also interested to join this WG.
>
> the participation request time commitment for the next months and it
> is quite critical for us.
>
> I will share the call with the membership list, but as PC we should
> decide who will be our members in the WG. we have to send the names
> by 19th May
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Rafik
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: *Glen de Saint G?ry* <Glen at icann.org <mailto:Glen at icann.org>>
> Date: 2014-05-13 1:04 GMT+09:00
> Subject: Call for GNSO Members - Forming GNSO Review Working Party
> To: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>>
> Cc: Marika Konings <marika.konings at icann.org
> <mailto:marika.konings at icann.org>>, "Larisa B. Gurnick"
> <larisa.gurnick at icann.org <mailto:larisa.gurnick at icann.org>>,
> "gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org
> <mailto:gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org>"
> <gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org <mailto:gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org>>
>
>
> Dear Rafik,
>
> Please note the Call for GNSO Members - Forming GNSO Review Working
> Party and please note the very tight timeframe.
> Thank you.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Glen
>
> */Summary/*
>
> Following the GNSO Council meeting on 8 May 2014, the GNSO Council
> would like to extend the invitation to join the GNSO Review Working
> Party to members of the GNSO community. The make-up of the Working
> Party is expected to reflect that of the GNSO community, with the
> opportunity for other Supporting Organizations and Advisory Committees
> to appoint an observer should they decide so.
>
> */Tasks of the GNSO Review Working Group Party/*
>
> The task of the GNSO Review Working Group Party will be to:
>
> 1. Function as a liaison between the GNSO, the independent examiner
> and the Board's Structural Improvements Committee;
> 2. Provide input on review criteria and the 360 Assessment[1]
> <#145f12d57bedb01d__ftn1>;
> 3. Serve as additional conduit for input from, and requests to, GNSO
> constituencies/stakeholder groups, Council;
> 4. Act as sounding board: offer objective guidance, reactions and
> comments to any preliminary conclusions and assessment and helping
> to ensure the draft report issued by the independent examiner
> accurately reflects the GNSO structure, scope and dynamics;
> 5. Coordinate with the GNSO community to prepare an Implementation
> Plan and champion implementation of improvement activities;
> 6. Perform support communication/awareness activities to encourage
> participation.
>
> */Volunteer Requirements/*
>
> The membership of the GNSO Review Working Party is proposed to include
> members representing the diversity of the GNSO community, mirroring
> the make-up of the GNSO Council (up to 3 representatives from the
> Registry Stakeholder Group, up to 3 representatives from the Registrar
> Stakeholder Group, up to 2 representatives from the Nominating
> Committee appointees, up to 2 representatives from the Business
> Constituency, up to 2 representative from the Intellectual Property
> Constituency, up to 2 representatives from the Internet Service and
> Connectivity Providers Constituency, up to 6 representatives from the
> Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group, in addition to the possibility for
> other SO/ACs to appoint 1 observer to the effort). The activities of
> the GNSO Review Working Party will be conducted in an open and fully
> transparent manner.
>
> Knowledge of the GNSO structure and operations as well as experience
> in evaluating performance and processes based on a set of objective
> criteria would be useful. Members are expected to participate
> actively and to devote sufficient time to the process. Time commitment
> is expected to be 50 -- 80 hours within the next 9 months, with work
> commencing immediately. Commitment to and compliance with ICANN's
> bottom-up, multistakeholder model, and accountability and transparency
> ethics are a requirement.
>
> */Submitting candidates/*
>
> Each Stakeholder Group / Constituency is expected to determine their
> own process for selecting members for this effort taking into account
> the requirements, especially in relation to expected time commitment
> listed above. Stakeholder Groups/Constituencies may, but are not
> required to fill all the slots allocated to their respective groups.
> Ideally the names of the proposed candidates are submitted *_by Monday
> 19 May at the latest_* as work has already commenced. The names of the
> proposed candidates should be submitted to the GNSO Secretariat
> (gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org
> <mailto:gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org>).
>
> */Background/*
>
> The objective of the GNSO Review[2] <#145f12d57bedb01d__ftn2> is to
> examine organizational effectiveness of the GNSO, including its
> structure components (GNSO Council, GNSO Working Groups, GNSO
> Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies). The review scheduled to begin
> on or about 1 July 2014 will be tightly scoped based on objective and
> quantifiable criteria provided to the independent examiner.
>
> Involvement of the GNSO community as well as input and participation
> from the broader community are important components of this review
> process. As discussed in GNSO Council meetings, the Structural
> Improvements Committee of the Board (SIC) has requested that a GNSO
> Review Working Party be assembled to function as a liaison between the
> GNSO, the independent examiner and the SIC, to provide input on review
> criteria and the 360 Assessment, coordinate interviews and objectively
> supply clarification and responses to the draft findings and
> recommendations. Once a final report is issued and the Board takes
> action on it, as appropriate, the GNSO Review Working Party is
> expected to coordinate with the GNSO community to prepare an
> Implementation Plan and champion implementation of improvement activities.
>
> Please see the recent announcement
> <http://gnso.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-22apr14-en.htm>
> about the GNSO Review for additional information and background.
>
> */Further Information/*
>
> Forming GNSO Review Working Party *Call for GNSO Members - Forming
> GNSO Review Working Party*
>
> */Summary/*
>
> Following the GNSO Council meeting on 8 May 2014, the GNSO Council
> would like to extend the invitation to join the GNSO Review Working
> Party to members of the GNSO community. The make-up of the Working
> Party is expected to reflect that of the GNSO community, with the
> opportunity for other Supporting Organizations and Advisory Committees
> to appoint an observer should they decide so.
>
> */Tasks of the GNSO Review Working Group Party/*
>
> The task of the GNSO Review Working Group Party will be to:
>
> 7. Function as a liaison between the GNSO, the independent examiner
> and the Board's Structural Improvements Committee;
> 8. Provide input on review criteria and the 360 Assessment[3]
> <#145f12d57bedb01d__ftn3>;
> 9. Serve as additional conduit for input from, and requests to, GNSO
> constituencies/stakeholder groups, Council;
> 10. Act as sounding board: offer objective guidance, reactions and
> comments to any preliminary conclusions and assessment and helping
> to ensure the draft report issued by the independent examiner
> accurately reflects the GNSO structure, scope and dynamics;
> 11. Coordinate with the GNSO community to prepare an Implementation
> Plan and champion implementation of improvement activities;
> 12. Perform support communication/awareness activities to encourage
> participation.
>
> */Volunteer Requirements/*
>
> The membership of the GNSO Review Working Party is proposed to include
> members representing the diversity of the GNSO community, mirroring
> the make-up of the GNSO Council (up to 3 representatives from the
> Registry Stakeholder Group, up to 3 representatives from the Registrar
> Stakeholder Group, up to 2 representatives from the Nominating
> Committee appointees, up to 2 representatives from the Business
> Constituency, up to 2 representative from the Intellectual Property
> Constituency, up to 2 representatives from the Internet Service and
> Connectivity Providers Constituency, up to 6 representatives from the
> Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group, in addition to the possibility for
> other SO/ACs to appoint 1 observer to the effort). The activities of
> the GNSO Review Working Party will be conducted in an open and fully
> transparent manner.
>
> Knowledge of the GNSO structure and operations as well as experience
> in evaluating performance and processes based on a set of objective
> criteria would be useful. Members are expected to participate
> actively and to devote sufficient time to the process. Time commitment
> is expected to be 50 -- 80 hours within the next 9 months, with work
> commencing immediately. Commitment to and compliance with ICANN's
> bottom-up, multi-stakeholder model, and accountability and
> transparency ethics are a requirement.
>
> */Submitting candidates/*
>
> Each Stakeholder Group / Constituency is expected to determine their
> own process for selecting members for this effort taking into account
> the requirements, especially in relation to expected time commitment
> listed above. Stakeholder Groups/Constituencies may, but are not
> required to fill all the slots allocated to their respective groups.
> Ideally the names of the proposed candidates are submitted *_by Monday
> 19 May at the latest_* as work has already commenced. The names of the
> proposed candidates should be submitted to the GNSO Secretariat
> (gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org
> <mailto:gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org>).
>
> */Background/*
>
> The objective of the GNSO Review[4] <#145f12d57bedb01d__ftn4>is to
> examine organizational effectiveness of the GNSO, including its
> structure components (GNSO Council, GNSO Working Groups, GNSO
> Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies). The review scheduled to begin
> on or about 1 July 2014 will be tightly scoped based on objective and
> quantifiable criteria provided to the independent examiner.
>
> Involvement of the GNSO community as well as input and participation
> from the broader community are important components of this review
> process. As discussed in GNSO Council meetings, the Structural
> Improvements Committee of the Board (SIC) has requested that a GNSO
> Review Working Party be assembled to function as a liaison between the
> GNSO, the independent examiner and the SIC, to provide input on review
> criteria and the 360 Assessment, coordinate interviews and objectively
> supply clarification and responses to the draft findings and
> recommendations. Once a final report is issued and the Board takes
> action on it, as appropriate, the GNSO Review Working Party is
> expected to coordinate with the GNSO community to prepare an
> Implementation Plan and champion implementation of improvement activities.
>
> Please see the recent announcement
> <http://gnso.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-22apr14-en.htm>about
> the GNSO Review for additional information and background.
>
> */Further Information/*
>
> ?Forming GNSO Review Working Party
> <http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/gnso-review-06may14-en.pdf>
>
> ?GNSO Review Webinar
> <http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-2-23apr14-en.htm.>
>
>
> Glen de Saint G?ry
>
> GNSO Secretariat
>
> gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org <mailto:gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org>
>
> http://gnso.icann.org
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> [1] <#145f12d57bedb01d__ftnref1>360 Assessment is an online mechanism
> to collect and summarize feedback from members of the GNSO community
> --- a "self-review" relative to objective and quantifiable criteria.
> Interested members of other ICANN organizations, Board and staff also
> may offer feedback.
>
> [2] <#145f12d57bedb01d__ftnref2>GNSO Review is mandated by ICANN's
> Bylaws <http://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/bylaws#IV>.
>
> [3] <#145f12d57bedb01d__ftnref3>360 Assessment is an online mechanism
> to collect and summarize feedback from members of the GNSO community
> --- a "self-review" relative to objective and quantifiable criteria.
> Interested members of other ICANN organizations, Board and staff also
> may offer feedback.
>
> [4] <#145f12d57bedb01d__ftnref4>GNSO Review is mandated by ICANN's
> Bylaws <http://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/bylaws#IV>.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20140514/0331c0aa/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the NCSG-PC
mailing list