[PC-NCSG] URGENT: Pending NCSG Statements
Avri Doria
avri
Tue Mar 11 20:56:52 EET 2014
or even Rudi as alt-chair
avri
On 11-Mar-14 14:56, Avri Doria wrote:
>
> agree
>
> avri
>
>
> On 11-Mar-14 13:51, Amr Elsadr wrote:
>> Thanks Rudi. In that case, I assume it would be safe for Rafik or Maria
>> to send these out as NCSG comments. I?ve attached them all again in PDF.
>>
>> Thanks to all.
>>
>> Amr
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mar 11, 2014, at 6:28 PM, Rudi Vansnick <rudi.vansnick at isoc.be
>> <mailto:rudi.vansnick at isoc.be>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Rafik,
>>>
>>> I can confirm NPOC supports the 3 NCSG statements as they were lastly
>>> attached to a message.
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>>
>>> Rudi Vansnick
>>> NPOC chair Policy Committee
>>> NPOC treasurer
>>> rudi.vansnick at npoc.org <mailto:rudi.vansnick at npoc.org>
>>> Tel : +32 (0)9 329 39 16
>>> Mobile : +32 (0)475 28 16 32
>>> www.npoc.org <http://www.npoc.org/>
>>>
>>> Op 11-mrt.-2014, om 14:08 heeft Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com
>>> <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>> het volgende geschreven:
>>>
>>>> Hi Rudi,
>>>>
>>>> I am really confused by your response:
>>>>
>>>> NPOC?s policy committee is reviewing the documents. So far, we
>>>> did not see important changes to the presented position statements.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> what kind of changes you were expecting? do you mean that you already
>>>> made some comments to the drafts?
>>>> we have 3 statements drafted which were shared , and we need to
>>>> submit them asap since we are already after the deadline . when the
>>>> NPOC PC will respond exactly?
>>>>
>>>> Being involved in the Translation/transliteration WG, we have
>>>> delayed the responses for a few extra weeks as we are still
>>>> expecting a lot of replies to our query.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I thought that any WG want to get answers quickly from community to
>>>> get guidance, so delaying doesn't make so much sense IMHO. or do you
>>>> mean that WG extended the questionnaire period? because I didn't see
>>>> any announcement on that matter.
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>>
>>>> Rafik
>>>>
>>>> NPOC treasurer
>>>> rudi.vansnick at npoc.org <mailto:rudi.vansnick at npoc.org>
>>>> Tel : +32 (0)9 329 39 16 <tel:%2B32%20%280%299%20329%2039%2016>
>>>> Mobile : +32 (0)475 28 16 32
>>>> <tel:%2B32%20%280%29475%2028%2016%2032>
>>>> www.npoc.org <http://www.npoc.org/>
>>>>
>>>> Op 7-mrt.-2014, om 15:58 heeft Maria Farrell
>>>> <maria.farrell at GMAIL.COM <mailto:maria.farrell at GMAIL.COM>> het
>>>> volgende geschreven:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks so much to the drafters of these excellent positions. I
>>>>> personally support all of them and am sorry that my workload
>>>>> this week has been too frantic to allow me to contribute.
>>>>>
>>>>> I just spotted a typo and one textual ambiguity in the privacy
>>>>> and proxy document, details attached below in bold and
>>>>> strikethrough, if there is time to revise them. (but these two
>>>>> points are not deal breakers if there is not time.)
>>>>>
>>>>> All the best, Maria
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 7 March 2014 14:36, Amr Elsadr <aelsadr at egyptig.org
>>>>> <mailto:aelsadr at egyptig.org>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Rudi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I?ve attached the three statements to this email, but
>>>>> unfortunately, we don?t have the luxury of waiting until we
>>>>> have an NCSG-PC call to review and submit them.The deadlines
>>>>> for these have already passed, and we?ve been asking for
>>>>> extensions for all of them. There has only been an update to
>>>>> one of them (Translation & Transliteration of Contact
>>>>> Information PDP WG) based on Kathy?s feedback on the
>>>>> NCSG-list. They?re the same comments Chris Dillon walked us
>>>>> through during the WG call yesterday. Could you and others
>>>>> please give feedback on this list?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>> Amr
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mar 7, 2014, at 2:53 PM, Rudi Vansnick
>>>>> <rudi.vansnick at ISOC.BE <mailto:rudi.vansnick at ISOC.BE>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I agree we need to start do some work in NCSG-PC. Can we
>>>>>> have a link to the statements as they are today so we do
>>>>>> not use wrong ones ?
>>>>>> I would call on the NCSG-PC chair to schedule an online
>>>>>> meeting so we can validate NCSG-PC positions on this.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Rudi Vansnick
>>>>>> NPOC chair Policy Committee
>>>>>> NPOC treasurer
>>>>>> rudi.vansnick at npoc.org <mailto:rudi.vansnick at npoc.org>
>>>>>> Tel : +32 (0)9 329 39 16
>>>>>> <tel:%2B32%20%280%299%20329%2039%2016>
>>>>>> Mobile : +32 (0)475 28 16 32
>>>>>> <tel:%2B32%20%280%29475%2028%2016%2032>
>>>>>> www.npoc.org <http://www.npoc.org/>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Op 7-mrt.-2014, om 12:16 heeft Rafik Dammak
>>>>>> <rafik.dammak at gmail.com <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>>
>>>>>> het volgende geschreven:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Amr,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> thanks for the reminder, NCSG PC members should review and
>>>>>>> indicate their support or not to the statements. we have
>>>>>>> statements but they are waiting approval!
>>>>>>> I asked for extension for the PPSAI questionnaire but I
>>>>>>> don't think that we can take more than one week to respond.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Rafik
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2014-03-06 18:52 GMT+09:00 Amr Elsadr <aelsadr at egyptig.org
>>>>>>> <mailto:aelsadr at egyptig.org>>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I don?t enjoy nagging, but there are three statements
>>>>>>> currently awaiting NCSG-PC endorsement:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 1. NCSG response to the Privacy and Proxy Services
>>>>>>> Accreditation Issues PDP WG
>>>>>>> 2. NCSG response to the gTLD Registration Data
>>>>>>> Services EWG status update report
>>>>>>> 3. NCSG response to the Translation and
>>>>>>> Transliteration of Contact Information PDP WG
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The response to the EWG can always be sent as an
>>>>>>> individual statement endorsed by whoever cares to sign
>>>>>>> it, but the responses to the two PDP WGs needs to be
>>>>>>> endorsed by either an SO, an AC, a SG or a
>>>>>>> constituency. These are very important statements that
>>>>>>> constitute the NCSG's official contribution to PDP
>>>>>>> WGs, and it would be a shame if we don?t declare a
>>>>>>> position on them only because we fail to endorse
>>>>>>> statements already drafted.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I urge you all to read through all three of the
>>>>>>> statements, ask questions or suggest changes, then
>>>>>>> either indicate that you support or don?t support them.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Note: There are still more requests for input pending
>>>>>>> that have not yet been drafted including the Policy
>>>>>>> and Implementation WG (a non-PDP WG) and the IRTP-D
>>>>>>> initial report. Not sure if I missed any.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Amr
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>>>>>>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>>>>>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>>>>>>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>>>>>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>>>>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>>>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> <maria farrell p&p comments.docx>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>>>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>
More information about the NCSG-PC
mailing list