[PC-NCSG] URGENT: Pending NCSG Statements

Avri Doria avri
Tue Mar 11 20:56:20 EET 2014


agree

avri


On 11-Mar-14 13:51, Amr Elsadr wrote:
> Thanks Rudi. In that case, I assume it would be safe for Rafik or Maria
> to send these out as NCSG comments. I?ve attached them all again in PDF.
>
> Thanks to all.
>
> Amr
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mar 11, 2014, at 6:28 PM, Rudi Vansnick <rudi.vansnick at isoc.be
> <mailto:rudi.vansnick at isoc.be>> wrote:
>
>> Hi Rafik,
>>
>> I can confirm NPOC supports the 3 NCSG statements as they were lastly
>> attached to a message.
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> Rudi Vansnick
>> NPOC chair Policy Committee
>> NPOC treasurer
>> rudi.vansnick at npoc.org <mailto:rudi.vansnick at npoc.org>
>> Tel : +32 (0)9 329 39 16
>> Mobile : +32 (0)475 28 16 32
>> www.npoc.org <http://www.npoc.org/>
>>
>> Op 11-mrt.-2014, om 14:08 heeft Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com
>> <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>> het volgende geschreven:
>>
>>> Hi Rudi,
>>>
>>> I am really confused by your response:
>>>
>>>     NPOC?s policy committee is reviewing the documents. So far, we
>>>     did not see important changes to the presented position statements.
>>>
>>>
>>> what kind of changes you were expecting? do you mean that you already
>>> made some comments to the drafts?
>>> we have 3 statements drafted which were shared , and we need to
>>> submit them asap since we are already after the deadline . when the
>>> NPOC PC will respond exactly?
>>>
>>>     Being involved in the Translation/transliteration WG, we have
>>>     delayed the responses for a few extra weeks as we are still
>>>     expecting a lot of replies to our query.
>>>
>>>
>>> I thought that any WG want to get answers quickly from community to
>>> get guidance, so delaying doesn't make so much sense IMHO. or do you
>>> mean that WG extended the questionnaire period? because I didn't see
>>> any announcement on that matter.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> Rafik
>>>
>>>     NPOC treasurer
>>>     rudi.vansnick at npoc.org <mailto:rudi.vansnick at npoc.org>
>>>     Tel : +32 (0)9 329 39 16 <tel:%2B32%20%280%299%20329%2039%2016>
>>>     Mobile : +32 (0)475 28 16 32 <tel:%2B32%20%280%29475%2028%2016%2032>
>>>     www.npoc.org <http://www.npoc.org/>
>>>
>>>     Op 7-mrt.-2014, om 15:58 heeft Maria Farrell
>>>     <maria.farrell at GMAIL.COM <mailto:maria.farrell at GMAIL.COM>> het
>>>     volgende geschreven:
>>>
>>>>     Hi everyone,
>>>>
>>>>     Thanks so much to the drafters of these excellent positions. I
>>>>     personally support all of them and am sorry that my workload
>>>>     this week has been too frantic to allow me to contribute.
>>>>
>>>>     I just spotted a typo and one textual ambiguity in the privacy
>>>>     and proxy document, details attached below in bold and
>>>>     strikethrough, if there is time to revise them. (but these two
>>>>     points are not deal breakers if there is not time.)
>>>>
>>>>     All the best, Maria
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     On 7 March 2014 14:36, Amr Elsadr <aelsadr at egyptig.org
>>>>     <mailto:aelsadr at egyptig.org>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>         Hi Rudi,
>>>>
>>>>         I?ve attached the three statements to this email, but
>>>>         unfortunately, we don?t have the luxury of waiting until we
>>>>         have an NCSG-PC call to review and submit them.The deadlines
>>>>         for these have already passed, and we?ve been asking for
>>>>         extensions for all of them. There has only been an update to
>>>>         one of them (Translation & Transliteration of Contact
>>>>         Information PDP WG) based on Kathy?s feedback on the
>>>>         NCSG-list. They?re the same comments Chris Dillon walked us
>>>>         through during the WG call yesterday. Could you and others
>>>>         please give feedback on this list?
>>>>
>>>>         Thanks.
>>>>
>>>>         Amr
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         On Mar 7, 2014, at 2:53 PM, Rudi Vansnick
>>>>         <rudi.vansnick at ISOC.BE <mailto:rudi.vansnick at ISOC.BE>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>         I agree we need to start do some work in NCSG-PC. Can we
>>>>>         have a link to the statements as they are today so we do
>>>>>         not use wrong ones ?
>>>>>         I would call on the NCSG-PC chair to schedule an online
>>>>>         meeting so we can validate NCSG-PC positions on this.
>>>>>
>>>>>         Kind regards,
>>>>>
>>>>>         Rudi Vansnick
>>>>>         NPOC chair Policy Committee
>>>>>         NPOC treasurer
>>>>>         rudi.vansnick at npoc.org <mailto:rudi.vansnick at npoc.org>
>>>>>         Tel : +32 (0)9 329 39 16 <tel:%2B32%20%280%299%20329%2039%2016>
>>>>>         Mobile : +32 (0)475 28 16 32
>>>>>         <tel:%2B32%20%280%29475%2028%2016%2032>
>>>>>         www.npoc.org <http://www.npoc.org/>
>>>>>
>>>>>         Op 7-mrt.-2014, om 12:16 heeft Rafik Dammak
>>>>>         <rafik.dammak at gmail.com <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>>
>>>>>         het volgende geschreven:
>>>>>
>>>>>>         Hi Amr,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         thanks for the reminder, NCSG PC members should review and
>>>>>>         indicate their support or not to the statements. we have
>>>>>>         statements but they are waiting approval!
>>>>>>         I asked for extension for the PPSAI questionnaire but I
>>>>>>         don't think that we can take more than one week to respond.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         Best,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         Rafik
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         2014-03-06 18:52 GMT+09:00 Amr Elsadr <aelsadr at egyptig.org
>>>>>>         <mailto:aelsadr at egyptig.org>>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             I don?t enjoy nagging, but there are three statements
>>>>>>             currently awaiting NCSG-PC endorsement:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             1. NCSG response to the Privacy and Proxy Services
>>>>>>             Accreditation Issues PDP WG
>>>>>>             2. NCSG response to the gTLD Registration Data
>>>>>>             Services EWG status update report
>>>>>>             3. NCSG response to the Translation and
>>>>>>             Transliteration of Contact Information PDP WG
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             The response to the EWG can always be sent as an
>>>>>>             individual statement endorsed by whoever cares to sign
>>>>>>             it, but the responses to the two PDP WGs needs to be
>>>>>>             endorsed by either an SO, an AC, a SG or a
>>>>>>             constituency. These are very important statements that
>>>>>>             constitute the NCSG's official contribution to PDP
>>>>>>             WGs, and it would be a shame if we don?t declare a
>>>>>>             position on them only because we fail to endorse
>>>>>>             statements already drafted.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             I urge you all to read through all three of the
>>>>>>             statements, ask questions or suggest changes, then
>>>>>>             either indicate that you support or don?t support them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             Note: There are still more requests for input pending
>>>>>>             that have not yet been drafted including the Policy
>>>>>>             and Implementation WG (a non-PDP WG) and the IRTP-D
>>>>>>             initial report. Not sure if I missed any.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             Thanks.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             Amr
>>>>>>             _______________________________________________
>>>>>>             PC-NCSG mailing list
>>>>>>             PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>>>>>>             http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         _______________________________________________
>>>>>>         PC-NCSG mailing list
>>>>>>         PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>>>>>>         http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         _______________________________________________
>>>>         PC-NCSG mailing list
>>>>         PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>>>>         http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     <maria farrell p&p comments.docx>
>>>
>>>
>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>     PC-NCSG mailing list
>>>     PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>>>     http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>




More information about the NCSG-PC mailing list