[PC-NCSG] URGENT: Pending NCSG Statements
Avri Doria
avri
Tue Mar 11 20:56:20 EET 2014
agree
avri
On 11-Mar-14 13:51, Amr Elsadr wrote:
> Thanks Rudi. In that case, I assume it would be safe for Rafik or Maria
> to send these out as NCSG comments. I?ve attached them all again in PDF.
>
> Thanks to all.
>
> Amr
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mar 11, 2014, at 6:28 PM, Rudi Vansnick <rudi.vansnick at isoc.be
> <mailto:rudi.vansnick at isoc.be>> wrote:
>
>> Hi Rafik,
>>
>> I can confirm NPOC supports the 3 NCSG statements as they were lastly
>> attached to a message.
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> Rudi Vansnick
>> NPOC chair Policy Committee
>> NPOC treasurer
>> rudi.vansnick at npoc.org <mailto:rudi.vansnick at npoc.org>
>> Tel : +32 (0)9 329 39 16
>> Mobile : +32 (0)475 28 16 32
>> www.npoc.org <http://www.npoc.org/>
>>
>> Op 11-mrt.-2014, om 14:08 heeft Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com
>> <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>> het volgende geschreven:
>>
>>> Hi Rudi,
>>>
>>> I am really confused by your response:
>>>
>>> NPOC?s policy committee is reviewing the documents. So far, we
>>> did not see important changes to the presented position statements.
>>>
>>>
>>> what kind of changes you were expecting? do you mean that you already
>>> made some comments to the drafts?
>>> we have 3 statements drafted which were shared , and we need to
>>> submit them asap since we are already after the deadline . when the
>>> NPOC PC will respond exactly?
>>>
>>> Being involved in the Translation/transliteration WG, we have
>>> delayed the responses for a few extra weeks as we are still
>>> expecting a lot of replies to our query.
>>>
>>>
>>> I thought that any WG want to get answers quickly from community to
>>> get guidance, so delaying doesn't make so much sense IMHO. or do you
>>> mean that WG extended the questionnaire period? because I didn't see
>>> any announcement on that matter.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> Rafik
>>>
>>> NPOC treasurer
>>> rudi.vansnick at npoc.org <mailto:rudi.vansnick at npoc.org>
>>> Tel : +32 (0)9 329 39 16 <tel:%2B32%20%280%299%20329%2039%2016>
>>> Mobile : +32 (0)475 28 16 32 <tel:%2B32%20%280%29475%2028%2016%2032>
>>> www.npoc.org <http://www.npoc.org/>
>>>
>>> Op 7-mrt.-2014, om 15:58 heeft Maria Farrell
>>> <maria.farrell at GMAIL.COM <mailto:maria.farrell at GMAIL.COM>> het
>>> volgende geschreven:
>>>
>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks so much to the drafters of these excellent positions. I
>>>> personally support all of them and am sorry that my workload
>>>> this week has been too frantic to allow me to contribute.
>>>>
>>>> I just spotted a typo and one textual ambiguity in the privacy
>>>> and proxy document, details attached below in bold and
>>>> strikethrough, if there is time to revise them. (but these two
>>>> points are not deal breakers if there is not time.)
>>>>
>>>> All the best, Maria
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 7 March 2014 14:36, Amr Elsadr <aelsadr at egyptig.org
>>>> <mailto:aelsadr at egyptig.org>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Rudi,
>>>>
>>>> I?ve attached the three statements to this email, but
>>>> unfortunately, we don?t have the luxury of waiting until we
>>>> have an NCSG-PC call to review and submit them.The deadlines
>>>> for these have already passed, and we?ve been asking for
>>>> extensions for all of them. There has only been an update to
>>>> one of them (Translation & Transliteration of Contact
>>>> Information PDP WG) based on Kathy?s feedback on the
>>>> NCSG-list. They?re the same comments Chris Dillon walked us
>>>> through during the WG call yesterday. Could you and others
>>>> please give feedback on this list?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>>> Amr
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mar 7, 2014, at 2:53 PM, Rudi Vansnick
>>>> <rudi.vansnick at ISOC.BE <mailto:rudi.vansnick at ISOC.BE>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I agree we need to start do some work in NCSG-PC. Can we
>>>>> have a link to the statements as they are today so we do
>>>>> not use wrong ones ?
>>>>> I would call on the NCSG-PC chair to schedule an online
>>>>> meeting so we can validate NCSG-PC positions on this.
>>>>>
>>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Rudi Vansnick
>>>>> NPOC chair Policy Committee
>>>>> NPOC treasurer
>>>>> rudi.vansnick at npoc.org <mailto:rudi.vansnick at npoc.org>
>>>>> Tel : +32 (0)9 329 39 16 <tel:%2B32%20%280%299%20329%2039%2016>
>>>>> Mobile : +32 (0)475 28 16 32
>>>>> <tel:%2B32%20%280%29475%2028%2016%2032>
>>>>> www.npoc.org <http://www.npoc.org/>
>>>>>
>>>>> Op 7-mrt.-2014, om 12:16 heeft Rafik Dammak
>>>>> <rafik.dammak at gmail.com <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>>
>>>>> het volgende geschreven:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Amr,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> thanks for the reminder, NCSG PC members should review and
>>>>>> indicate their support or not to the statements. we have
>>>>>> statements but they are waiting approval!
>>>>>> I asked for extension for the PPSAI questionnaire but I
>>>>>> don't think that we can take more than one week to respond.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Rafik
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2014-03-06 18:52 GMT+09:00 Amr Elsadr <aelsadr at egyptig.org
>>>>>> <mailto:aelsadr at egyptig.org>>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don?t enjoy nagging, but there are three statements
>>>>>> currently awaiting NCSG-PC endorsement:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1. NCSG response to the Privacy and Proxy Services
>>>>>> Accreditation Issues PDP WG
>>>>>> 2. NCSG response to the gTLD Registration Data
>>>>>> Services EWG status update report
>>>>>> 3. NCSG response to the Translation and
>>>>>> Transliteration of Contact Information PDP WG
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The response to the EWG can always be sent as an
>>>>>> individual statement endorsed by whoever cares to sign
>>>>>> it, but the responses to the two PDP WGs needs to be
>>>>>> endorsed by either an SO, an AC, a SG or a
>>>>>> constituency. These are very important statements that
>>>>>> constitute the NCSG's official contribution to PDP
>>>>>> WGs, and it would be a shame if we don?t declare a
>>>>>> position on them only because we fail to endorse
>>>>>> statements already drafted.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I urge you all to read through all three of the
>>>>>> statements, ask questions or suggest changes, then
>>>>>> either indicate that you support or don?t support them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Note: There are still more requests for input pending
>>>>>> that have not yet been drafted including the Policy
>>>>>> and Implementation WG (a non-PDP WG) and the IRTP-D
>>>>>> initial report. Not sure if I missed any.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Amr
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>>>>>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>>>>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>>>>>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>>>>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>>>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> <maria farrell p&p comments.docx>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>
More information about the NCSG-PC
mailing list