[PC-NCSG] URGENT: Pending NCSG Statements

[Amr Elsadr]

Hi Avri,

I noted your question on the response to the PPSAI PDP WG. I figured some folks were busy with the NetMundial submission deadline, but still agree that there is an obligation to be fulfilled by this committee. 

So far, the three responses (all in support of the comments) were by Maria, Stephanie and myself. 

Thanks. 

Amr

Sent from mobile

> On Mar 10, 2014, at 4:56 PM, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Wow a genuine dressing down.  I'm impressed.
> 
> I think there is also a responsibility of the leaders of the group to get these things.  Wendy and I failed to achieve it when it was my turn, and was hoping the new guys would be better at it.
> 
> So which are the 3 that responded.  If you are going to use shame, you might as well use name.
> 
> Just to indicate where I am at, started reading one of them got confused. Asked a question  and then got sidetracked to other things.
> 
> cheers,
> 
> avri
> 
> 
> 
>> On 10-Mar-14 11:41, Robin Gross wrote:
>> I can sympathize with frustration over needing to get comments in on
>> behalf of NCSG, but having inadequate engagement from the individual
>> representatives of NCSG PC to get the job done.
>> 
>> There are duties and responsibilities that come with being a
>> representative of the NCSG PC - including engaging in the process to get
>> comments in on behalf of our members.  That is what we members elect PC
>> representatives to do on our behalf.
>> 
>> If you are a NCSG PC representative, you have an affirmative obligation
>> to read and comment on drafts that the PC is asked to endorse.
>> 
>> If PC representatives are not able to meet the responsibilities of being
>> a representative on the NCSG PC, he or she should let the chair know, so
>> alternative arrangements can be made and members can be represented.  We