[PC-NCSG] Fwd: Board seat #14

[Magaly Pazello]

I am in my way to airport,
quick reply to let you know I am also share Avri's views.
See you soon!
Magaly


On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 8:20 AM, Maria Farrell <maria.farrell at gmail.com>
wrote:

> I share Avri's view.
>
> Continuing to press Sam as a viable candidate when he has clearly had his
> chance and our full support will damage relations both within our
> stakeholder group and also with the CSG.
>
> Let's move on.
>
> Maria
>
>
> On 19 June 2014 11:43, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I agree. Lets do the math. And remember that no matter what any
>> individual in CSG ever says they would like to do, they vote as
>> directed. That's their compact.
>>
>> All of us should seek Dan out for bi-laterals (what a silly word).
>> Has he been invited to the privacy to-do?
>>
>> Let's talk to Dan, formally, as early as possible in London.
>> The Constituencies can invite him in for a brief chart if they wish.
>> If we give up lunch beak on constituency day, can NCSG do it then?
>>
>> Then decide if we can live with him in the role.
>> And move on if we can.
>>
>> It would still require a vote between him and NOTA, but he would have to
>> convince just one 1 of us.
>>
>> Sam is a good man, but he was not able to convince them he was a
>> compromise they could live with.  Now it is our turn to find out if we
>> think Dan is a good man and to see if he is a compromise we can live with.
>>
>> avri
>>
>>
>>
>> On 19-Jun-14 02:04, David Cake wrote:
>> > Klaus, I don't think you understand what the word 'compromise' means in
>> > this context.
>> >
>> > If you have reason to believe that the CSG would vote differently to the
>> > way they have expressly told you they would vote, let us know.
>> > Otherwise, let us continue on with a compromise process rather than
>> > continue on with an adversarial voting process that we have already
>> > shown will get us nowhere.
>> >
>> > Regards
>> >
>> > David
>> >
>> > On 19 Jun 2014, at 6:54 am, Klaus Stoll <klaus.stoll at gkpfoundation.org
>> > <mailto:klaus.stoll at gkpfoundation.org>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Dear Rafik
>> >>
>> >> No objections in contacting him, but under the clear understanding
>> >> that Sam's name will be on the ballot for the next round. We can not
>> >> just let them reject Sam without a vote and then expect us to accept
>> >> someone else from their side.
>> >>
>> >> Yours
>> >>
>> >> Klaus
>> >>
>> >> On 6/19/2014 1:45 AM, Rafik Dammak wrote:
>> >>> Hello everyone,
>> >>>
>> >>> CSG is proposing a compromise candidate Daniel Reed and suggesting to
>> >>> contact him.
>> >>> for GNSO councillor, any feedback about the interaction with him?
>> >>>
>> >>> Best,
>> >>>
>> >>> Rafik
>> >>>
>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> >>> From: *Metalitz, Steven* <met at msk.com <mailto:met at msk.com>>
>> >>> Date: 2014-06-19 6:25 GMT+09:00
>> >>> Subject: Board seat #14
>> >>> To: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com <mailto:
>> rafik.dammak at gmail.com>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Hello Rafik,
>> >>>
>> >>> Sorry for delay in getting back to you on this.
>> >>>
>> >>> After further consideration and discussion, CSG leadership is willing
>> >>> to consider Dan Reed as a possible compromise candidate.
>> >>>
>> >>> In that regard, we encourage you to reach out to Dan to arrange a
>> >>> group interview or discussion with NCSG as you think appropriate.
>> >>> Dan?s e-mail address is     _dan-reed at uiowa.edu_
>> >>> <mailto:dan-reed at uiowa.edu>_    .  _
>> >>>
>> >>> We look forward to hearing NCSG?s reaction as to Dan as a possible
>> >>> compromise candidate.
>> >>>
>> >>> Safe travels to London (assuming you are attending the ICANN meeting)
>> >>> and see you there.
>> >>>
>> >>> Steve Metalitz for CSG Ex Comm
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>> >>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>> >>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> PC-NCSG mailing list
>> >> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>> >> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > PC-NCSG mailing list
>> > PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>> > http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>> >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20140619/d8616d51/attachment-0001.html>