[PC-NCSG] Fwd: Board seat #14

[Maria Farrell]

I share Avri's view.

Continuing to press Sam as a viable candidate when he has clearly had his
chance and our full support will damage relations both within our
stakeholder group and also with the CSG.

Let's move on.

Maria


On 19 June 2014 11:43, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I agree. Lets do the math. And remember that no matter what any
> individual in CSG ever says they would like to do, they vote as
> directed. That's their compact.
>
> All of us should seek Dan out for bi-laterals (what a silly word).
> Has he been invited to the privacy to-do?
>
> Let's talk to Dan, formally, as early as possible in London.
> The Constituencies can invite him in for a brief chart if they wish.
> If we give up lunch beak on constituency day, can NCSG do it then?
>
> Then decide if we can live with him in the role.
> And move on if we can.
>
> It would still require a vote between him and NOTA, but he would have to
> convince just one 1 of us.
>
> Sam is a good man, but he was not able to convince them he was a
> compromise they could live with.  Now it is our turn to find out if we
> think Dan is a good man and to see if he is a compromise we can live with.
>
> avri
>
>
>
> On 19-Jun-14 02:04, David Cake wrote:
> > Klaus, I don't think you understand what the word 'compromise' means in
> > this context.
> >
> > If you have reason to believe that the CSG would vote differently to the
> > way they have expressly told you they would vote, let us know.
> > Otherwise, let us continue on with a compromise process rather than
> > continue on with an adversarial voting process that we have already
> > shown will get us nowhere.
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > David
> >
> > On 19 Jun 2014, at 6:54 am, Klaus Stoll <klaus.stoll at gkpfoundation.org
> > <mailto:klaus.stoll at gkpfoundation.org>> wrote:
> >
> >> Dear Rafik
> >>
> >> No objections in contacting him, but under the clear understanding
> >> that Sam's name will be on the ballot for the next round. We can not
> >> just let them reject Sam without a vote and then expect us to accept
> >> someone else from their side.
> >>
> >> Yours
> >>
> >> Klaus
> >>
> >> On 6/19/2014 1:45 AM, Rafik Dammak wrote:
> >>> Hello everyone,
> >>>
> >>> CSG is proposing a compromise candidate Daniel Reed and suggesting to
> >>> contact him.
> >>> for GNSO councillor, any feedback about the interaction with him?
> >>>
> >>> Best,
> >>>
> >>> Rafik
> >>>
> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> >>> From: *Metalitz, Steven* <met at msk.com <mailto:met at msk.com>>
> >>> Date: 2014-06-19 6:25 GMT+09:00
> >>> Subject: Board seat #14
> >>> To: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com <mailto:
> rafik.dammak at gmail.com>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Hello Rafik,
> >>>
> >>> Sorry for delay in getting back to you on this.
> >>>
> >>> After further consideration and discussion, CSG leadership is willing
> >>> to consider Dan Reed as a possible compromise candidate.
> >>>
> >>> In that regard, we encourage you to reach out to Dan to arrange a
> >>> group interview or discussion with NCSG as you think appropriate.
> >>> Dan?s e-mail address is     _dan-reed at uiowa.edu_
> >>> <mailto:dan-reed at uiowa.edu>_    .  _
> >>>
> >>> We look forward to hearing NCSG?s reaction as to Dan as a possible
> >>> compromise candidate.
> >>>
> >>> Safe travels to London (assuming you are attending the ICANN meeting)
> >>> and see you there.
> >>>
> >>> Steve Metalitz for CSG Ex Comm
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> PC-NCSG mailing list
> >>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> >>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> PC-NCSG mailing list
> >> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
> >> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > PC-NCSG mailing list
> > PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> > http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20140619/b73de628/attachment.html>